Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

test: remove redundant running spec #771

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 8, 2024

Conversation

drivebyer
Copy link
Collaborator

@drivebyer drivebyer commented Feb 8, 2024

截屏2024-02-08 18 30 28

after remove:

截屏2024-02-08 18 29 16

the duration has been reduced from 10 seconds to 6 seconds.

@drivebyer drivebyer enabled auto-merge (squash) February 8, 2024 10:34
@drivebyer drivebyer changed the title test: remove redundant creating test: remove redundant running spec Feb 8, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 8, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (997dc67) 32.79% compared to head (bb4cec4) 32.79%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #771   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   32.79%   32.79%           
=======================================
  Files          19       19           
  Lines        3232     3232           
=======================================
  Hits         1060     1060           
  Misses       2113     2113           
  Partials       59       59           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@drivebyer drivebyer merged commit bb69d00 into OT-CONTAINER-KIT:master Feb 8, 2024
31 of 32 checks passed
@drivebyer drivebyer deleted the remove-redundant branch February 8, 2024 11:49
mattrobinsonsre pushed a commit to mattrobinsonsre/redis-operator that referenced this pull request Jul 11, 2024
test: remove redundant running spec

Signed-off-by: drivebyer <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Matt Robinson <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants