[UT] add runtime framework/arch and userlike UT code

[SeanHH86]

MR Summary:

The summary is added by @codegpt.

This Merge Request introduces a comprehensive update to the application's database layer, focusing on runtime frameworks, architectures, and user interactions with likes. Key changes include:

1. Addition of new store implementations for runtime architectures, runtime frameworks, and user likes, each equipped with a constructor that accepts a database connection.
2. Implementation of unit tests for each new store functionality, ensuring methods like add, list, delete, and find operations work as expected across runtime frameworks, architectures, and user likes.
3. Introduction of methods to handle user interactions with repositories and collections, including liking and unliking functionalities.

Overall, this MR enhances the application's backend by improving data management and user interaction capabilities.

[starship-github]

Possible Issues And Suggestions:

• builder/store/database/runtime_architecture_test.go

  • Comments:
    • The context.TODO() should be replaced with a more specific context or passed down from the test function parameters to allow better control over timeouts and cancellations.
  • Suggestions:

    // Consider passing context as a parameter to the test functions or using a more specific context.
    ctx := context.Background()
    

• builder/store/database/runtime_architecture_test.go

  • Comments:
    • Repeated initialization and closure of the test database in each test function can be inefficient. Consider using a setup and teardown mechanism or a test suite to optimize database usage.

• builder/store/database/runtime_architecture_test.go

  • Comments:
    • The error check require.Nil(t, err) is used after database operations. It's more idiomatic to use require.NoError(t, err) for error checking in tests.
  • Suggestions:

    require.NoError(t, err)
    

• builder/store/database/user_like_test.go

  • Comments:
    • The test 'TestUserLikeStore_UnlikeCollection' expects 'col.Likes' to remain 'int64(1)' after liking and then unliking a collection, which seems incorrect as the likes should decrement.
  • Suggestions:

    require.Equal(t, col.Likes, int64(0))
    

• builder/store/database/user_like.go

  • Comments:
    • The 'assertAffectedOneRow' function is used without checking if the operation affects exactly one row. This could lead to silent failures or unintended behavior.

• Line 66 in builder/store/database/runtime_framework_test.go

  • Comments:
    • The test 'TestRuntimeFrameworksStore_FindByIDAndDelete' uses 'sql.ErrNoRows' to check the non-existence of a framework after deletion. This assumes specific behavior of 'FindByID' that may not be explicitly defined.

MR Evaluation:

This feature is still under test, evaluation are given by AI and might be inaccurate.

After evaluation, the code changes in the Merge Request get score: 100.

Tips

CodeReview Commands (invoked as MR or PR comments)

• @codegpt /review to trigger an code review.
• @codegpt /evaluate to trigger code evaluation process.
• @codegpt /describe to regenerate the summary of the MR.
• @codegpt /secscan to scan security vulnerabilities for the MR or the Repository.
• @codegpt /help to get help.

CodeReview Discussion Chat

There are 2 ways to chat with Starship CodeReview:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by StarShip.
  Example:
  • @codegpt How to fix this bug?
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab):
  Tag @codegpt in a new review comment at the desired location with your query.
  Examples:
  • @codegpt generate unit testing code for this code snippet.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window.
It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks.
For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the MR/PR comments.

CodeReview Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation
  for detailed information on how to use Starship CodeReview.

About Us:

Visit the OpenCSG StarShip website for the Dashboard and detailed information on CodeReview, CodeGen, and other StarShip modules.

[starship-github]

The StarShip CodeReviewer was triggered but terminated because it encountered an issue: The MR state is not opened.

Tips

CodeReview Commands (invoked as MR or PR comments)

• @codegpt /review to trigger an code review.
• @codegpt /evaluate to trigger code evaluation process.
• @codegpt /describe to regenerate the summary of the MR.
• @codegpt /secscan to scan security vulnerabilities for the MR or the Repository.
• @codegpt /help to get help.

CodeReview Discussion Chat

There are 2 ways to chat with Starship CodeReview:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by StarShip.
  Example:
  • @codegpt How to fix this bug?
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab):
  Tag @codegpt in a new review comment at the desired location with your query.
  Examples:
  • @codegpt generate unit testing code for this code snippet.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window.
It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks.
For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the MR/PR comments.

CodeReview Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation
  for detailed information on how to use Starship CodeReview.