Broadcast functions #252
Open
Broadcast functions #252
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Broadcast function See merge request product/starhub/starhub-server!828
Linter Issue ReportDuring the code review, a list issues were found. These issues could affect the code quality, maintainability, and consistency. Below is the detailed Linter issue report: builder/store/database/broadcast.goLint Issue: undefined: DB
Lint Issue: undefined: DB
Lint Issue: undefined: defaultDB
Lint Issue: undefined: assertAffectedOneRow
builder/store/database/migrations/20250115105617_create_broadcast.goLint Issue: undefined: Migrations
Lint Issue: undefined: createTables
Lint Issue: undefined: dropTables
api/handler/broadcast_test.goLint Issue: undefined: GinTester
Lint Issue: undefined: NewGinTester
Lint Issue: tester.WithParam undefined (type *BroadcastTester has no field or method WithParam)
Lint Issue: t.ginHandler undefined (type *BroadcastTester has no field or method ginHandler)
Lint Issue: tester.ctx undefined (type *BroadcastTester has no field or method ctx)
Lint Issue: tester.Execute undefined (type *BroadcastTester has no field or method Execute)
Lint Issue: tester.ResponseEqSimple undefined (type *BroadcastTester has no field or method ResponseEqSimple)
Lint Issue: tester.WithBody undefined (type *BroadcastTester has no field or method WithBody)
component/wire_gen_test.goLint Issue: undefined: promptComponentImpl
Lint Issue: undefined: userComponentImpl
Lint Issue: undefined: spaceComponentImpl
Lint Issue: undefined: modelComponentImpl
Lint Issue: undefined: accountingComponentImpl
Lint Issue: undefined: gitHTTPComponentImpl
Lint Issue: undefined: discussionComponentImpl
Lint Issue: undefined: runtimeArchitectureComponentImpl
Lint Issue: undefined: mirrorComponentImpl
Lint Issue: undefined: collectionComponentImpl
Lint Issue: undefined: datasetComponentImpl
Please make the suggested changes to improve the code quality. |
![starship-github[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1043282?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
| }) *testBroadcastWithMocks { | ||
| mockStores := tests.NewMockStores(t) | ||
| componentBroadcastComponentImpl := NewTestBroadcastComponent(mockStores) | ||
| mockAccountingComponent := component.NewMockAccountingComponent(t) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
- Comments:
- The
initializeTestBroadcastComponentfunction is missing error handling for mock expectations.
- The
- Suggestions:
mockAccountingComponent.EXPECT().AnyMethod().Return(expectedResult, nil).AnyTimes()
|
|
||
| var broadcast types.Broadcast | ||
| if err := ctx.ShouldBindJSON(&broadcast); err != nil { | ||
| err = fmt.Errorf("cant parse as Broadcast,%w", err) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
- Comments:
- Error wrapping in
CreateandUpdatemethods uses%wwithfmt.Errorf, but the error is logged and returned as a bad request, potentially exposing internal details.
- Error wrapping in
- Suggestions:
err = fmt.Errorf("cant parse as Broadcast, %v", err)
| } | ||
|
|
||
| var newBroadcast types.Broadcast | ||
| temporaryVariable, _ := json.Marshal(broadcast) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
- Comments:
- Direct JSON marshaling and unmarshaling in
GetBroadcast,AllBroadcasts, andActiveBroadcastmethods to convert between types is inefficient and error-prone.
- Direct JSON marshaling and unmarshaling in
- Suggestions:
newBroadcast := types.Broadcast{ Content: broadcast.Content, BcType: broadcast.BcType, Theme: broadcast.Theme, Status: broadcast.Status, }
| Where("id =?", id). | ||
| Scan(ctx) | ||
| if err != nil { | ||
| return nil, fmt.Errorf("can not find collection: %w", err) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
- Comments:
- Error message in
Getmethod is misleading, suggesting a collection can't be found instead of a broadcast.
- Error message in
- Suggestions:
fmt.Errorf("can not find broadcast: %w", err)
| } | ||
|
|
||
| func (s *broadcastStoreImpl) Update(ctx context.Context, broadcast Broadcast) (*Broadcast, error) { | ||
| _, err := s.db.Core.NewUpdate().Model(&broadcast).WherePK().Exec(ctx) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
- Comments:
Updatemethod does not check if the update operation actually affects any rows, potentially hiding failed updates.
- Suggestions:
return &broadcast, assertAffectedOneRow(s.db.Core.NewUpdate().Model(&broadcast).WherePK().Exec(ctx))
| return nil, fmt.Errorf("error creating broadcast handler:%w", err) | ||
| } | ||
| broadcast := apiGroup.Group("/broadcasts") | ||
| adminBroadcast := apiGroup.Group("/admin/broadcasts") |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
- Comments:
- Missing error handling for NewBroadcastHandler could lead to a nil pointer dereference if broadcastHandler is used after a failed initialization.
| MockSuperSet, BroadcastComponentSet, | ||
| wire.Struct(new(testBroadcastWithMocks), "*"), | ||
| ) | ||
| return &testBroadcastWithMocks{} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
- Comments:
- The initializeTestBroadcastComponent function does not check the result of wire.Build, potentially ignoring errors.
- Suggestions:
wire.Build( MockSuperSet, BroadcastComponentSet, wire.Struct(new(testBroadcastWithMocks), "*"), ) return &testBroadcastWithMocks{}, nil // Consider handling potential errors from wire.Build
| ret := _m.Called(ctx) | ||
|
|
||
| if len(ret) == 0 { | ||
| panic("no return value specified for ActiveBroadcast") |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
- Comments:
- The panic in the mock functions (e.g., ActiveBroadcast) might not be the best way to handle missing return values. Consider returning an error instead.
- Suggestions:
if len(ret) == 0 { return nil, errors.New("no return value specified for ActiveBroadcast") }
| } | ||
|
|
||
| func AdminAuthenticator(config *config.Config) gin.HandlerFunc { | ||
| userSvcClient := rpc.NewUserSvcHttpClient(fmt.Sprintf("%s:%d", config.User.Host, config.User.Port), |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
- Comments:
- The AdminAuthenticator function uses string concatenation for creating the service client URL. Consider using a more robust URL construction method to avoid potential issues.
- Suggestions:
url := fmt.Sprintf("http://%s:%d", config.User.Host, config.User.Port)
Possible Issues And Suggestions:
MR Evaluation:This feature is still under test, evaluation are given by AI and might be inaccurate. After evaluation, the code changes in the Merge Request get score: 98-100. TipsCodeReview Commands (invoked as MR or PR comments)
CodeReview Discussion ChatThere are 2 ways to chat with Starship CodeReview:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. CodeReview Documentation and Community
About Us:Visit the OpenCSG StarShip website for the Dashboard and detailed information on CodeReview, CodeGen, and other StarShip modules. |
hiveer
requested review from
Rader,
Yiling-J,
pulltheflower,
SeanHH86 and
ganisback
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What is this feature?
[Add a brief description of what the feature or update does.]
Why do we need this feature?
[Add a description of the problem the feature is trying to solve.]
Who is this feature for?
[Add information on what kind of user the feature is for.]
Which issue(s) does this PR fix?:
Fixes #
Special notes for your reviewer:
MR Summary:
The summary is added by @codegpt.
This Merge Request introduces a new feature for broadcasting messages within the system. It includes backend support for creating, updating, fetching, and managing broadcast messages, which can be of various types (e.g., banners, messages) and themes (e.g., light, dark). The feature targets all users and aims to enhance communication and information dissemination across the platform.
Key updates: