Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
Merge pull request #133 from OpenPEPPOL/POACC-590
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
Editing text for negative invoices in BIS
  • Loading branch information
jerouris authored Sep 27, 2023
2 parents 1a3c095 + ca7fabd commit 869790c
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Showing 2 changed files with 6 additions and 10 deletions.
2 changes: 2 additions & 0 deletions guide/release-notes/v3.0.16.adoc
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -6,6 +6,8 @@ Release date:: 2023-11-01

* A recommendation has been added to the Sales Order Reference element for handling cases where there is no Purchase Order Reference. This clarifies what to do with the mandatory UBL element for Purchase Order Reference. Example file is added which illustrates this.

* Text in section 4.6 on negative invoices edited to remove historic comparison to BIS2 and justification for the change. No functional change.

== Changes to code lists and validation artefacts

* The validation rule identified as PEPPOL-EN16931-R006, which ensures that only one Invoice Object is allowed at the document level in an invoice/credit note, has been removed. This is because it duplicates the European standard rule UBL-SR-04, making it redundant and unnecessary.
Expand Down
14 changes: 4 additions & 10 deletions guide/transaction-spec/functionality/negative-invoices.adoc
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -2,21 +2,15 @@
= Negative invoices and credit notes


In line with requirements of {EN16931} this BIS supports negative grand totals. This represents a significant change in comparison to {openpeppol}’s previous specifications where invoices and credit notes have non-negative total.

The argument for negative invoices is to open up for a wider spectrum of invoicing processes.
In line with requirements of {EN16931} this BIS supports negative grand totals in order to open up for a wider spectrum of invoicing processes.

Examples of such processes are

* Preliminary (estimated) consumption invoice that is balanced out in a later meter-based invoice;
* Pre-payment (with or without VAT) is settled through a final invoice; and
* Preliminary (estimated) consumption invoice that is balanced out in a later meter-based invoice;
* Pre-payment (with or without VAT) is settled through a final invoice; and
* Some user communities prefer to use negative invoice rather than credit note when correcting transactions.

====
NOTE: Buyers who value automatic matching of e-invoices to orders or invoicing objects may wish to limit the areas and situations where complex transactions can be accepted and voice their requirements at time of procurement.
====

The decision has the following implications on the transaction format:
This has the following implications on the transaction format:

* The invoice (now with “negative invoice capacity”) can function as an alternative to the credit note. Invoice-generating systems may implement either option, while invoice-receiving systems have to support both of them.
* The transaction format for credit note has to be designed to accommodate for negative grand total, as well; this is because an entire negative invoice may have to be balanced out by means of a credit note.
Expand Down

0 comments on commit 869790c

Please sign in to comment.