Check area name validity using number of 118th Congressional districts

[martinholmer]

This change to the create_area_weights.py script adds a few valid area names for the six states that gained Congressional districts after the 2020 Census redistricting and subtracts one district for the seven states that lost a district. Here are those states:

GAINERS:
state,2010cds,2020cds= CO  7  8
state,2010cds,2020cds= FL 27 28
state,2010cds,2020cds= MT  1  2
state,2010cds,2020cds= NC 13 14
state,2010cds,2020cds= OR  5  6
state,2010cds,2020cds= TX 36 38

LOSERS:
state,2010cds,2020cds= CA 53 52
state,2010cds,2020cds= IL 18 17
state,2010cds,2020cds= MI 14 13
state,2010cds,2020cds= NY 27 26
state,2010cds,2020cds= OH 16 15
state,2010cds,2020cds= PA 18 17
state,2010cds,2020cds= WV  3  2

So, for example, after this change is merged into the master branch, tx37 and tx38 will be considered valid area names and ca53 and ny27 will be considered invalid area names.

Note that as before 00 is a valid area number for all states regardless of the number of Congressional districts. So, for example, after these changes are merged into the master branch, mt00, mt01, and mt02 will be valid area names.

[donboyd5]

Thanks, sorry I missed your request for review.

…

On Mon, Nov 4, 2024 at 1:42 PM Martin Holmer ***@***.***> wrote: Merged #276 <#276> into master. — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#276 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABR4JGCHIC7JOMQ7VIJEH6LZ66WXNAVCNFSM6AAAAABRC5BOVOVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV45UABCJFZXG5LFIV3GK3TUJZXXI2LGNFRWC5DJN5XDWMJVGEYDQNZXGEYTSMI> . You are receiving this because your review was requested.Message ID: <PSLmodels/tax-microdata-benchmarking/pull/276/issue_event/15108771191@ github.com>