Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update lie_closure.py #6983

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Feb 24, 2025
Merged

Update lie_closure.py #6983

merged 3 commits into from
Feb 24, 2025

Conversation

CatalinaAlbornoz
Copy link
Contributor

Added clarification about imaginary coefficients in lie_closure.
I didn't do any of the checks below.

Before submitting

Please complete the following checklist when submitting a PR:

  • All new features must include a unit test.
    If you've fixed a bug or added code that should be tested, add a test to the
    test directory!

  • All new functions and code must be clearly commented and documented.
    If you do make documentation changes, make sure that the docs build and
    render correctly by running make docs.

  • Ensure that the test suite passes, by running make test.

  • Add a new entry to the doc/releases/changelog-dev.md file, summarizing the
    change, and including a link back to the PR.

  • The PennyLane source code conforms to
    PEP8 standards.
    We check all of our code against Pylint.
    To lint modified files, simply pip install pylint, and then
    run pylint pennylane/path/to/file.py.

When all the above are checked, delete everything above the dashed
line and fill in the pull request template.


Context:

Description of the Change:

Benefits:

Possible Drawbacks:

Related GitHub Issues:

Added clarification about imaginary coefficients in lie_closure.
Copy link
Contributor

Hello. You may have forgotten to update the changelog!
Please edit doc/releases/changelog-dev.md with:

  • A one-to-two sentence description of the change. You may include a small working example for new features.
  • A link back to this PR.
  • Your name (or GitHub username) in the contributors section.

Copy link
Contributor

@dwierichs dwierichs left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks @CatalinaAlbornoz ! 👍

Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 24, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 99.59%. Comparing base (76b585d) to head (d67ce50).

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #6983   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   99.59%   99.59%           
=======================================
  Files         483      483           
  Lines       46066    46066           
=======================================
  Hits        45881    45881           
  Misses        185      185           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@co9olguy co9olguy enabled auto-merge (squash) February 24, 2025 20:07
@co9olguy co9olguy merged commit 4a5d44f into master Feb 24, 2025
46 checks passed
@co9olguy co9olguy deleted the catalina-lie-closure-doc-enhancement branch February 24, 2025 20:14
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants