Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Components] langbase #14085 #14466

Open
wants to merge 11 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

[Components] langbase #14085 #14466

wants to merge 11 commits into from

Conversation

lcaresia
Copy link
Collaborator

@lcaresia lcaresia commented Oct 30, 2024

WHY

Summary by CodeRabbit

Release Notes

  • New Features

    • Introduced the ability to create, list, and delete memory sets within the Langbase application.
    • Added a user-friendly interface for managing organization memories.
  • Improvements

    • Enhanced memory management capabilities with new methods for creating, listing, and deleting memories.
    • Updated application version to 0.1.0, ensuring compatibility with the latest dependencies.
  • Documentation

    • Updated documentation links for new memory management features.

@lcaresia lcaresia linked an issue Oct 30, 2024 that may be closed by this pull request
Copy link

vercel bot commented Oct 30, 2024

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
docs-v2 ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Nov 18, 2024 0:30am
2 Skipped Deployments
Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
pipedream-docs ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Nov 18, 2024 0:30am
pipedream-docs-redirect-do-not-edit ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Nov 18, 2024 0:30am

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 30, 2024

Walkthrough

This pull request introduces several new modules and enhancements to the Langbase application, focusing on memory management. It includes the creation, listing, and deletion of memory sets through newly defined actions. The langbase.app.mjs file is updated to support these actions with new properties and methods for handling memory data. Additionally, the package.json file reflects a version update and the addition of a new dependency.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
components/langbase/actions/create-memory/create-memory.mjs - New module for creating a memory with properties like name and description.
- Exports an asynchronous run method that calls createMemory and returns a success message.
components/langbase/actions/list-memories/list-memories.mjs - New module for listing memory sets.
- Exports an asynchronous run method that calls listMemories and returns the number of retrieved memory sets along with the complete response.
components/langbase/actions/delete-memory/delete-memory.mjs - New module for deleting a memory.
- Exports an asynchronous run method that calls deleteMemory and returns a success message upon deletion.
components/langbase/langbase.app.mjs - Added new properties (memoryName, name, description) to propDefinitions.
- Introduced methods for API requests (_makeRequest, createMemory, deleteMemory, listMemories).
- Removed the authKeys() method.
components/langbase/package.json - Updated version from 0.0.1 to 0.1.0.
- Added a new dependency on @pipedream/platform with version ^3.0.3.

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

action

Suggested reviewers

  • GTFalcao

Poem

In the land of Langbase, memories grow,
With actions to create, list, and let go.
A rabbit hops high, with joy in its heart,
For managing memories is a fine art!
So let’s celebrate, with a flick of our ears,
New features abound, let’s hop with cheers! 🐰✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

GTFalcao
GTFalcao previously approved these changes Oct 30, 2024
Copy link
Collaborator

@GTFalcao GTFalcao left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 3

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (7)
components/langbase/package.json (1)

Line range hint 1-18: Verify package.json completeness.

The package.json structure looks good, but consider adding the following recommended fields for better package maintenance:

  • repository field to link to the source code
  • bugs field for issue reporting
  • license field to specify the package license
components/langbase/actions/delete-memories/delete-memory.mjs (2)

9-17: Add missing trailing commas for consistency.

The props definition looks good, but let's add trailing commas to follow consistent style guidelines.

      propDefinition: [
        app,
-        "memoryName"
+        "memoryName",
      ]
-    },
+    },
🧰 Tools
🪛 eslint

[error] 14-15: Missing trailing comma.

(comma-dangle)


[error] 15-16: Missing trailing comma.

(comma-dangle)


19-28: Consider adding explicit error handling.

While the implementation is good, consider adding try-catch block to handle potential errors gracefully and provide more informative error messages to users.

   async run({ $ }) {
+    try {
       const response = await this.app.deleteMemory({
         $,
         memoryName: this.memoryName,
       });

       $.export("$summary", `Successfully deleted memory named ${this.memoryName}`);

       return response;
+    } catch (error) {
+      $.export("$summary", `Failed to delete memory ${this.memoryName}: ${error.message}`);
+      throw error;
+    }
   },
components/langbase/actions/create-memory/create-memory.mjs (1)

3-23: Add missing trailing commas for better git diffs.

Add trailing commas to improve maintainability and make future diffs cleaner.

      propDefinition: [
        app,
-        "name"
+        "name",
      ]
    },
    description: {
      propDefinition: [
        app,
-        "description"
+        "description",
      ]
-    },
+    },
🧰 Tools
🪛 eslint

[error] 14-15: Missing trailing comma.

(comma-dangle)


[error] 15-16: Missing trailing comma.

(comma-dangle)


[error] 20-21: Missing trailing comma.

(comma-dangle)


[error] 21-22: Missing trailing comma.

(comma-dangle)

components/langbase/langbase.app.mjs (3)

13-14: Rename memoryNames to memorySets for clarity

Assigning response.memorySets to memoryNames may cause confusion since the variable represents memory sets, not just names. Renaming memoryNames to memorySets would enhance clarity and maintain consistency with the response property.

Apply this diff:

           const response = await this.listMemories();
-          const memoryNames = response.memorySets;
-          return memoryNames.map(({ name, description }) => ({
+          const memorySets = response.memorySets;
+          return memorySets.map(({ name, description }) => ({
             label: description,
             value: name,
           }));
🧰 Tools
🪛 eslint

[error] 14-14: Expected a line break after this opening brace.

(object-curly-newline)


[error] 14-14: Expected a line break before this closing brace.

(object-curly-newline)


18-18: Add missing trailing comma in memoryName prop definition

There's a missing trailing comma after the closing brace of the memoryName prop definition. This may cause linting errors and is required by the code style guidelines.

Apply this diff:

         }
-      }
+      },
🧰 Tools
🪛 eslint

[error] 18-19: Missing trailing comma.

(comma-dangle)


45-49: Ensure consistent property name quotation in headers

There is an inconsistency in how property names are quoted in the headers object. To adhere to code style guidelines and resolve linting errors, consider quoting all property names consistently.

Apply this diff:

             ...headers,
-            Authorization: `Bearer ${this.$auth.org_api_key}`,
+            "Authorization": `Bearer ${this.$auth.org_api_key}`,
             "Accept": `application/json`,
🧰 Tools
🪛 eslint

[error] 47-47: Inconsistently quoted property 'Authorization' found.

(quote-props)


[error] 48-48: Strings must use doublequote.

(quotes)

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 129369a and 3c5c02d.

📒 Files selected for processing (5)
  • components/langbase/actions/create-memory/create-memory.mjs (1 hunks)
  • components/langbase/actions/delete-memories/delete-memory.mjs (1 hunks)
  • components/langbase/actions/list-memories/list-memories.mjs (1 hunks)
  • components/langbase/langbase.app.mjs (1 hunks)
  • components/langbase/package.json (2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 eslint
components/langbase/actions/create-memory/create-memory.mjs

[error] 14-15: Missing trailing comma.

(comma-dangle)


[error] 15-16: Missing trailing comma.

(comma-dangle)


[error] 20-21: Missing trailing comma.

(comma-dangle)


[error] 21-22: Missing trailing comma.

(comma-dangle)


[error] 30-31: Missing trailing comma.

(comma-dangle)


[error] 31-32: Missing trailing comma.

(comma-dangle)


[error] 33-33: Trailing spaces not allowed.

(no-trailing-spaces)


[error] 35-35: Trailing spaces not allowed.

(no-trailing-spaces)

components/langbase/actions/delete-memories/delete-memory.mjs

[error] 14-15: Missing trailing comma.

(comma-dangle)


[error] 15-16: Missing trailing comma.

(comma-dangle)

components/langbase/langbase.app.mjs

[error] 14-14: Expected a line break after this opening brace.

(object-curly-newline)


[error] 14-14: Expected a line break before this closing brace.

(object-curly-newline)


[error] 18-19: Missing trailing comma.

(comma-dangle)


[error] 47-47: Inconsistently quoted property 'Authorization' found.

(quote-props)


[error] 48-48: Strings must use doublequote.

(quotes)


[error] 59-59: Expected a line break after this opening brace.

(object-curly-newline)


[error] 59-59: Expected a line break before this closing brace.

(object-curly-newline)

🔇 Additional comments (8)
components/langbase/package.json (1)

3-3: LGTM! Version bump and dependency addition look appropriate.

The version bump to 0.1.0 correctly reflects the addition of new features (memory management), and the @pipedream/platform dependency is properly specified with a caret range.

Also applies to: 15-16

components/langbase/actions/list-memories/list-memories.mjs (2)

1-2: LGTM!

The import statement correctly references the Langbase app module using a relative path.


3-11: Verify the documentation link.

The documentation link https://langbase.com/docs/api-reference/memory/list needs to be verified as it might be a placeholder.

✅ Verification successful

Documentation link is valid and accessible

The documentation URL https://langbase.com/docs/api-reference/memory/list is accessible and returns a successful HTTP 200 response. The response headers indicate it's a valid Next.js page serving the API documentation.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if the documentation URL is valid and accessible
# Note: Using curl with -I (head request) and -L (follow redirects)
curl -IL https://langbase.com/docs/api-reference/memory/list

Length of output: 1164

components/langbase/actions/delete-memories/delete-memory.mjs (2)

1-8: LGTM! Well-structured metadata with documentation link.

The metadata is well-defined with a clear key, name, and version. The documentation link in the description provides a good reference for users.


1-1: Verify the deleteMemory method implementation.

Let's ensure the imported app module properly implements the deleteMemory method being used.

Also applies to: 20-23

✅ Verification successful

Integration with app module is properly implemented

The verification confirms that:

  • The deleteMemory method is correctly implemented in langbase.app.mjs
  • It accepts the expected parameters { memoryName, ...args }
  • The method makes an HTTP DELETE request to the appropriate endpoint
  • The usage in delete-memory.mjs matches the implementation
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the deleteMemory method implementation in the app module

# Search for the deleteMemory method definition
ast-grep --pattern 'deleteMemory({ $, memoryName }) {
  $$$
}'

# Alternatively, search for any deleteMemory method
rg -A 5 'deleteMemory.*[{(]'

Length of output: 1074

components/langbase/actions/create-memory/create-memory.mjs (3)

1-2: LGTM!

The import statement is correctly structured and follows ES module conventions.


26-32: Verify API integration and response structure.

Let's confirm the app's createMemory method implementation and its response structure.

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the createMemory method implementation and usage

echo "Checking createMemory method implementation:"
ast-grep --pattern 'createMemory($$$) {
  $$$
}'

echo -e "\nChecking for other usages of createMemory:"
rg 'createMemory' --type js --type mjs
🧰 Tools
🪛 eslint

[error] 30-31: Missing trailing comma.

(comma-dangle)


[error] 31-32: Missing trailing comma.

(comma-dangle)


7-7: Verify version alignment with app version.

The component version is set to "0.0.1". Let's verify this aligns with the app's versioning strategy.

Comment on lines +13 to +21
async run({ $ }) {
const response = await this.app.listMemories({
$,
});

$.export("$summary", `Successfully retrieved ${response.memorySets.length} memorysets`);

return response;
},
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Add error handling and response validation.

The current implementation has several areas that could be improved for better reliability and user experience:

  1. Add try-catch block for API error handling
  2. Validate response structure before accessing memorySets
  3. Enhance summary message with more details

Consider applying these improvements:

 async run({ $ }) {
+  try {
     const response = await this.app.listMemories({
       $,
     });
 
+    if (!response?.memorySets) {
+      throw new Error('Invalid response structure: memorySets not found');
+    }
+
+    const count = response.memorySets.length;
     $.export("$summary", `Successfully retrieved ${response.memorySets.length} memorysets`);
 
     return response;
+  } catch (error) {
+    throw new Error(`Failed to list memories: ${error.message}`);
+  }
 },
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
async run({ $ }) {
const response = await this.app.listMemories({
$,
});
$.export("$summary", `Successfully retrieved ${response.memorySets.length} memorysets`);
return response;
},
async run({ $ }) {
try {
const response = await this.app.listMemories({
$,
});
if (!response?.memorySets) {
throw new Error('Invalid response structure: memorySets not found');
}
const count = response.memorySets.length;
$.export("$summary", `Successfully retrieved ${response.memorySets.length} memorysets`);
return response;
} catch (error) {
throw new Error(`Failed to list memories: ${error.message}`);
}
},

Comment on lines 25 to 37
async run({ $ }) {
const response = await this.app.createMemory({
$,
data: {
name: this.name,
description: this.description
}
});

$.export("$summary", `Successfully created memory ${this.name}`);

return response;
},
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Add error handling and input validation.

The implementation could be improved in several ways:

  1. Add try-catch block for API error handling
  2. Validate inputs before making the API call
  3. Include more details in the success message
   async run({ $ }) {
+    // Validate required inputs
+    if (!this.name?.trim()) {
+      throw new Error("Name is required and cannot be empty");
+    }
+
+    try {
       const response = await this.app.createMemory({
         $,
         data: {
           name: this.name,
-          description: this.description
+          description: this.description,
         }
       });
 
-      $.export("$summary", `Successfully created memory ${this.name}`);
+      $.export("$summary", `Successfully created memory "${this.name}"${this.description ? ` with description: "${this.description}"` : ""}`);
 
       return response;
+    } catch (error) {
+      throw new Error(`Failed to create memory: ${error.message}`);
+    }
   },
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
async run({ $ }) {
const response = await this.app.createMemory({
$,
data: {
name: this.name,
description: this.description
}
});
$.export("$summary", `Successfully created memory ${this.name}`);
return response;
},
async run({ $ }) {
// Validate required inputs
if (!this.name?.trim()) {
throw new Error("Name is required and cannot be empty");
}
try {
const response = await this.app.createMemory({
$,
data: {
name: this.name,
description: this.description,
}
});
$.export("$summary", `Successfully created memory "${this.name}"${this.description ? ` with description: "${this.description}"` : ""}`);
return response;
} catch (error) {
throw new Error(`Failed to create memory: ${error.message}`);
}
},
🧰 Tools
🪛 eslint

[error] 30-31: Missing trailing comma.

(comma-dangle)


[error] 31-32: Missing trailing comma.

(comma-dangle)


[error] 33-33: Trailing spaces not allowed.

(no-trailing-spaces)


[error] 35-35: Trailing spaces not allowed.

(no-trailing-spaces)

},
async deleteMemory({ memoryName, ...args }) {
return this._makeRequest({
path: `/memorysets/sergio19733/${memoryName}`,
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Fix hard-coded organization ID in deleteMemory method

The deleteMemory method uses a hard-coded organization ID ('sergio19733'), which should be replaced with the dynamic value from this.$auth.org to ensure it works correctly for different organizations.

Apply this diff to fix the issue:

           return this._makeRequest({
-            path: `/memorysets/sergio19733/${memoryName}`,
+            path: `/org/${this.$auth.org}/memorysets/${memoryName}`,
             method: "delete",
             ...args,
           });
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
path: `/memorysets/sergio19733/${memoryName}`,
path: `/org/${this.$auth.org}/memorysets/${memoryName}`,

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
components/langbase/langbase.app.mjs (2)

22-31: Clarify the distinction between name and description properties.

The name and description properties seem to have overlapping purposes. Consider:

  1. Adding validation rules for the name (e.g., allowed characters, length)
  2. Making the distinction between these fields clearer in their descriptions

Apply this diff to improve the property definitions:

     name: {
       type: "string",
       label: "Name",
-      description: "Name of the memory",
+      description: "Unique identifier for the memory (alphanumeric, max 64 chars)",
+      validate: "^[a-zA-Z0-9-_]+$",
     },
     description: {
       type: "string",
       label: "Description",
-      description: "Short description of the memory",
+      description: "Human-readable description of the memory's purpose and contents",
     },

34-36: Consider making the base URL configurable.

The base URL is hardcoded. Consider making it configurable through environment variables or app settings to support different environments (e.g., staging, production).

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 3c5c02d and 9616f4f.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (2)
  • package-lock.json is excluded by !**/package-lock.json
  • pnpm-lock.yaml is excluded by !**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • components/langbase/actions/create-memory/create-memory.mjs (1 hunks)
  • components/langbase/actions/delete-memories/delete-memory.mjs (1 hunks)
  • components/langbase/langbase.app.mjs (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
  • components/langbase/actions/create-memory/create-memory.mjs
  • components/langbase/actions/delete-memories/delete-memory.mjs
🔇 Additional comments (2)
components/langbase/langbase.app.mjs (2)

1-6: LGTM: Import and app declaration are correct.

The import statement and app declaration follow Pipedream's standard conventions.


37-53: LGTM: Well-structured request handling.

The _makeRequest method is well-implemented with:

  • Proper parameter destructuring
  • Authorization header setup
  • Flexible options passing

Comment on lines +11 to +20
async options() {
const response = await this.listMemories();
const memoryNames = response.memorySets;
return memoryNames.map(({
name, description,
}) => ({
label: description,
value: name,
}));
},
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Add error handling and null checks in options() method.

The options() method could fail if the API call fails or returns unexpected data structure.

Apply this diff to add proper error handling:

       async options() {
+        try {
           const response = await this.listMemories();
+          if (!response?.memorySets) {
+            console.log("No memory sets found or unexpected response structure");
+            return [];
+          }
           const memoryNames = response.memorySets;
           return memoryNames.map(({
             name, description,
           }) => ({
             label: description,
             value: name,
           }));
+        } catch (err) {
+          console.log("Error fetching memory options:", err);
+          return [];
+        }
       },
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
async options() {
const response = await this.listMemories();
const memoryNames = response.memorySets;
return memoryNames.map(({
name, description,
}) => ({
label: description,
value: name,
}));
},
async options() {
try {
const response = await this.listMemories();
if (!response?.memorySets) {
console.log("No memory sets found or unexpected response structure");
return [];
}
const memoryNames = response.memorySets;
return memoryNames.map(({
name, description,
}) => ({
label: description,
value: name,
}));
} catch (err) {
console.log("Error fetching memory options:", err);
return [];
}
},

Comment on lines +54 to +74
async createMemory(args = {}) {
return this._makeRequest({
path: `/org/${this.$auth.org}/memorysets`,
method: "post",
...args,
});
},
async deleteMemory({
memoryName, ...args
}) {
return this._makeRequest({
path: `/memorysets/sergio19733/${memoryName}`,
method: "delete",
...args,
});
},
async listMemories(args = {}) {
return this._makeRequest({
path: `/org/${this.$auth.org}/memorysets`,
...args,
});
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot Nov 5, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Standardize API path patterns across methods.

The API path patterns are inconsistent between methods. Some use /org/${this.$auth.org}/memorysets while others use a different pattern.

Apply this diff to standardize the paths:

     async createMemory(args = {}) {
       return this._makeRequest({
         path: `/org/${this.$auth.org}/memorysets`,
         method: "post",
         ...args,
       });
     },
     async deleteMemory({
       memoryName, ...args
     }) {
       return this._makeRequest({
-        path: `/memorysets/sergio19733/${memoryName}`,
+        path: `/org/${this.$auth.org}/memorysets/${memoryName}`,
         method: "delete",
         ...args,
       });
     },
     async listMemories(args = {}) {
       return this._makeRequest({
         path: `/org/${this.$auth.org}/memorysets`,
         ...args,
       });
     },
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
async createMemory(args = {}) {
return this._makeRequest({
path: `/org/${this.$auth.org}/memorysets`,
method: "post",
...args,
});
},
async deleteMemory({
memoryName, ...args
}) {
return this._makeRequest({
path: `/memorysets/sergio19733/${memoryName}`,
method: "delete",
...args,
});
},
async listMemories(args = {}) {
return this._makeRequest({
path: `/org/${this.$auth.org}/memorysets`,
...args,
});
async createMemory(args = {}) {
return this._makeRequest({
path: `/org/${this.$auth.org}/memorysets`,
method: "post",
...args,
});
},
async deleteMemory({
memoryName, ...args
}) {
return this._makeRequest({
path: `/org/${this.$auth.org}/memorysets/${memoryName}`,
method: "delete",
...args,
});
},
async listMemories(args = {}) {
return this._makeRequest({
path: `/org/${this.$auth.org}/memorysets`,
...args,
});

Copy link
Collaborator

@GTFalcao GTFalcao Nov 5, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is this intended? (coderabbit's comment @ hard-coded organization)

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@GTFalcao, the suggestion aims to standardize the API path patterns across the methods. Currently, the deleteMemory method uses a hardcoded username sergio19733 in its path (/memorysets/sergio19733/${memoryName}), while the other methods (createMemory and listMemories) use the organization variable from this.$auth.org (e.g., /org/${this.$auth.org}/memorysets). Is the use of sergio19733 intentional, or should it be replaced with this.$auth.org to ensure consistency and proper functionality across different organizations?

@lcaresia
Copy link
Collaborator Author

lcaresia commented Nov 5, 2024

/approve

Comment on lines +54 to +74
async createMemory(args = {}) {
return this._makeRequest({
path: `/org/${this.$auth.org}/memorysets`,
method: "post",
...args,
});
},
async deleteMemory({
memoryName, ...args
}) {
return this._makeRequest({
path: `/memorysets/sergio19733/${memoryName}`,
method: "delete",
...args,
});
},
async listMemories(args = {}) {
return this._makeRequest({
path: `/org/${this.$auth.org}/memorysets`,
...args,
});
Copy link
Collaborator

@GTFalcao GTFalcao Nov 5, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is this intended? (coderabbit's comment @ hard-coded organization)

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 9616f4f and 70ca4d6.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • pnpm-lock.yaml is excluded by !**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • components/langbase/actions/delete-memory/delete-memory.mjs (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
components/langbase/actions/delete-memory/delete-memory.mjs (2)

11-16: Verify memoryName prop definition

The memoryName prop references a propDefinition from the app. Let's ensure it's properly defined and whether it should be marked as required.

#!/bin/bash
# Check the app.mjs file for memoryName propDefinition
ast-grep --pattern 'propDefinitions: {
  $$$
  memoryName: {
    $$$
  },
  $$$
}'

3-29: Verify consistency with other Langbase actions

Let's ensure this action follows the same patterns as other Langbase actions in terms of structure, error handling, and response format.

#!/bin/bash
# Find and compare with other Langbase actions
fd -e mjs -p 'components/langbase/actions/**/[^.]*\.mjs$' --exec head -n 30 {}

Comment on lines +19 to +28
async run({ $ }) {
const response = await this.app.deleteMemory({
$,
memoryName: this.memoryName,
});

$.export("$summary", `Successfully deleted memory named ${this.memoryName}`);

return response;
},
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Add error handling and response validation

The current implementation lacks error handling and response validation. Consider adding try-catch block and response validation.

Here's a suggested improvement:

  async run({ $ }) {
+   if (!this.memoryName) {
+     throw new Error("Memory name is required");
+   }
+
+   try {
      const response = await this.app.deleteMemory({
        $,
        memoryName: this.memoryName,
      });
+
+     if (!response) {
+       throw new Error("Received invalid response from deleteMemory");
+     }

      $.export("$summary", `Successfully deleted memory named ${this.memoryName}`);

      return response;
+   } catch (error) {
+     throw new Error(`Failed to delete memory: ${error.message}`);
+   }
  },
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
async run({ $ }) {
const response = await this.app.deleteMemory({
$,
memoryName: this.memoryName,
});
$.export("$summary", `Successfully deleted memory named ${this.memoryName}`);
return response;
},
async run({ $ }) {
if (!this.memoryName) {
throw new Error("Memory name is required");
}
try {
const response = await this.app.deleteMemory({
$,
memoryName: this.memoryName,
});
if (!response) {
throw new Error("Received invalid response from deleteMemory");
}
$.export("$summary", `Successfully deleted memory named ${this.memoryName}`);
return response;
} catch (error) {
throw new Error(`Failed to delete memory: ${error.message}`);
}
},

export default {
key: "langbase-delete-memory",
name: "Delete Memory",
description: "Delete an existing memory on Langbase. [See the documentation](https://langbase.com/docs/api-reference/memory/delete)",
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codebase verification

Documentation URL needs to be updated to match the API domain

The documentation URL in the component uses langbase.com/docs, but the actual API domain is api.langbase.com. The documentation URL should be consistent with the API domain being used in the application code.

  • Update the documentation URL in components/langbase/actions/delete-memory/delete-memory.mjs to use the correct domain
  • Also update similar documentation URLs in other action files:
    • components/langbase/actions/list-memories/list-memories.mjs
    • components/langbase/actions/create-memory/create-memory.mjs
🔗 Analysis chain

Verify the documentation URL

The documentation URL appears to use a placeholder domain (langbase.com). Please ensure this points to the correct documentation URL.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check if the documentation URL is referenced elsewhere in the codebase
rg -l "langbase\.com/docs" --type-add 'docs:*.{md,mdx}' -tdocs

Length of output: 2271


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check for the base URL pattern in all JavaScript/TypeScript files
rg "langbase\.com" --type=js

# Also check the app file for API configuration
cat components/langbase/langbase.app.mjs

Length of output: 1851

@lcaresia
Copy link
Collaborator Author

/approve

@GTFalcao
Copy link
Collaborator

@lcaresia can you please take a look at the review comment before this is approved?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Components] langbase
2 participants