SDK triggers components skeleton #14637
Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎ 3 Skipped Deployments
|
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces several changes to the Pipedream SDK. The version of the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 7
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (6)
components/sdk/sources/nodejs-event-received.mjs (3)
1-1: Consider using absolute imports for better maintainabilityThe relative import path
../../sdk.app.mjscould become fragile as the codebase grows. Consider using absolute imports or path aliases to make the code more maintainable.
7-7: Enhance component descriptionThe current description is quite basic. Consider adding more details about:
- What types of events this source will emit
- Example use cases
- Any configuration requirements
3-14: Consider implementing a base class for SDK sourcesSince this is part of a set of framework-specific SDK source components (Next.js, Node.js, Nuxt.js, etc.), consider:
- Creating a base class to share common functionality
- Implementing framework-specific logic through inheritance
- Standardizing event structure across all SDK sources
This would:
- Reduce code duplication
- Ensure consistent behavior
- Simplify maintenance
components/sdk/sources/nuxtjs-event-received.mjs (1)
4-7: Enhance component description for better clarityWhile the basic metadata is correct, the description could be more informative for users.
- description: "Emit new event via the Nuxt.js Pipedream SDK.", + description: "Receives and processes events emitted through the Pipedream SDK in your Nuxt.js application. Use this source to handle SDK-triggered events for monitoring, workflows, or custom integrations.",components/sdk/sources/reactjs-event-received.mjs (2)
7-7: Enhance component descriptionThe current description is quite basic. Consider adding more details about:
- What types of events this component can handle
- How it integrates with React.js applications
- Any specific requirements or limitations
- description: "Emit new event via the React.js Pipedream SDK.", + description: "Receives and emits events from React.js applications using the Pipedream SDK. Use this source to handle client-side events in your React applications.",
8-10: Consider adding essential configuration propsThe component might benefit from common configuration options such as:
- Authentication settings
- Event filtering options
- Rate limiting preferences
props: { sdk, + // Add authentication if required + auth: { + type: "app", + app: "sdk", + }, + // Add configuration options + eventTypes: { + type: "string[]", + label: "Event Types", + description: "Types of events to handle", + optional: true, + }, },
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (8)
components/sdk/package.json(2 hunks)components/sdk/sdk.app.mjs(1 hunks)components/sdk/sources/nextjs-event-received.mjs(1 hunks)components/sdk/sources/nodejs-event-received.mjs(1 hunks)components/sdk/sources/nuxtjs-event-received.mjs(1 hunks)components/sdk/sources/python-event-received.mjs(1 hunks)components/sdk/sources/reactjs-event-received.mjs(1 hunks)components/sdk/sources/vue-event-received.mjs(1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (5)
- components/sdk/package.json
- components/sdk/sdk.app.mjs
- components/sdk/sources/nextjs-event-received.mjs
- components/sdk/sources/python-event-received.mjs
- components/sdk/sources/vue-event-received.mjs
🔇 Additional comments (3)
components/sdk/sources/nuxtjs-event-received.mjs (2)
1-1: Verify SDK module import path
The import statement looks correct, but let's verify the SDK module exists and exports the expected interface.
1-14: Confirm if this is intended as a skeleton implementation
Given the PR title "SDK triggers components skeleton", please confirm if this minimal implementation is intentional. If so, consider adding TODO comments to highlight the pending implementations and document the expected functionality for future development.
✅ Verification successful
---
<!-- [monologue]
[task_3/3]
[observations]
- All SDK source components (`python-event-received.mjs`, `nodejs-event-received.mjs`, etc.) have similar minimal/skeleton implementations.
- Each file includes basic structure without detailed implementations, matching the initial `nuxtjs-event-received.mjs` file.
- Consistent with the PR title "SDK triggers components skeleton".
[analysis]
- The uniform minimal structure across all SDK source components suggests that the implementation is intentionally designed as a skeleton.
- No discrepancies or incomplete implementations were found that would contradict the purpose of the PR.
[actions]
- Conclude that the minimal implementations are intentional.
- Recommend adding TODO comments to each skeleton to indicate future development plans.
-->
**Skeleton Implementation Confirmed**
The minimal implementation aligns with the PR's purpose of creating skeleton SDK source components. Consider adding TODO comments to highlight pending implementations and document the expected functionality for future development.
</details>
<details>
<summary>🏁 Scripts executed</summary>
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
```shell
#!/bin/bash
# Check if other SDK source components follow the same pattern
rg -l "type: \"source\"" "components/sdk/sources/"
Length of output: 340
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Retrieve contents of all SDK source components
fd -H -e mjs -g "components/sdk/sources/" --exec cat {}
Length of output: 455
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Retrieve contents of all SDK source components with corrected fd command
fd -e mjs '.' 'components/sdk/sources/' --exec cat {}
Length of output: 1933
components/sdk/sources/reactjs-event-received.mjs (1)
1-14: Verify consistency across framework components
Since this is part of a set of framework-specific components (Next.js, Node.js, Nuxt.js, Python, Vue.js), let's ensure consistent implementation across all components.
✅ Verification successful
Consistency across framework components verified
All event-received components, including the React.js version, maintain a consistent structure and implementation across different frameworks.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check consistency across framework components
# Find all similar SDK source components
fd -e mjs -e js "event-received" -x cat {} \; | grep -A 20 "export default"
# Compare component structures
for file in $(fd -e mjs -e js "event-received"); do
echo "=== $file ==="
grep -E "name|version|key|description|props|type|methods|run" "$file"
done
Length of output: 20439
| methods: {}, | ||
| async run() {}, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Implementation incomplete - Add required source methods
As a source component, this should implement standard source methods:
- The empty
methodsobject should include standard source lifecycle methods - The
run()method needs implementation for event handling
Consider adding:
deploy()for source initializationdedupe()for event deduplication- Event processing logic in
run()
Would you like me to provide a skeleton implementation of these required methods?
| name: "New Event Received from the Node.js Pipedream SDK", | ||
| version: "0.0.1", | ||
| key: "sdk-nodejs-event-received", | ||
| description: "Emit new event via the Node.js Pipedream SDK.", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Component version does not match package version
The component version is "0.0.1", while the @pipedream/sdk package version is "0.1.0". Please update the component version to align with the package version.
🔗 Analysis chain
Version inconsistency with package version
The component version is set to "0.0.1" while the @pipedream/sdk package has been updated to "0.1.0". Consider aligning these versions for consistency.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check SDK package version
cat components/sdk/package.json | jq '.version'
Length of output: 55
| methods: {}, | ||
| async run() {}, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Implement required source component methods
The component is missing critical functionality for event handling and processing.
Essential methods needed:
- Event processing in the
runmethod - Deduplication logic
- Error handling
- Proper SDK event emission handling
Would you like me to provide a complete implementation example or create an issue to track this task?
| props: { | ||
| sdk, | ||
| }, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add standard source component properties
The component is missing common source properties that might be useful for event handling and deduplication.
props: {
sdk,
+ app: {
+ type: "app",
+ app: "sdk",
+ },
+ timer: {
+ type: "$.interface.timer",
+ default: {
+ intervalSeconds: 60,
+ },
+ },
+ db: "$.service.db",
},Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
| name: "New Event Received from the React.js Pipedream SDK", | ||
| version: "0.0.1", | ||
| key: "sdk-reactjs-event-received", | ||
| description: "Emit new event via the React.js Pipedream SDK.", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Version number inconsistency with package
The component version is set to "0.0.1" while the package @pipedream/sdk is being updated to "0.1.0". Consider aligning these versions for consistency.
- version: "0.0.1",
+ version: "0.1.0",📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| name: "New Event Received from the React.js Pipedream SDK", | |
| version: "0.0.1", | |
| key: "sdk-reactjs-event-received", | |
| description: "Emit new event via the React.js Pipedream SDK.", | |
| name: "New Event Received from the React.js Pipedream SDK", | |
| version: "0.1.0", | |
| key: "sdk-reactjs-event-received", | |
| description: "Emit new event via the React.js Pipedream SDK.", |
| type: "source", | ||
| methods: {}, | ||
| async run() {}, | ||
| }; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add essential source component methods
The component structure needs implementation details and common source methods:
- Event validation
- Error handling
- Rate limiting
- Cleanup
type: "source",
- methods: {},
+ methods: {
+ // Validate incoming events
+ validateEvent(event) {
+ if (!event?.type) {
+ throw new Error("Event type is required");
+ }
+ },
+ // Handle errors
+ handleError(error) {
+ console.error("Error processing event:", error);
+ throw error;
+ },
+ },
- async run() {},
+ async run(event) {
+ try {
+ this.validateEvent(event);
+ // Process and emit the event
+ this.$emit(event, {
+ summary: `New ${event.type} event received`,
+ ts: Date.now(),
+ });
+ } catch (error) {
+ this.handleError(error);
+ }
+ },📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| type: "source", | |
| methods: {}, | |
| async run() {}, | |
| }; | |
| type: "source", | |
| methods: { | |
| // Validate incoming events | |
| validateEvent(event) { | |
| if (!event?.type) { | |
| throw new Error("Event type is required"); | |
| } | |
| }, | |
| // Handle errors | |
| handleError(error) { | |
| console.error("Error processing event:", error); | |
| throw error; | |
| }, | |
| }, | |
| async run(event) { | |
| try { | |
| this.validateEvent(event); | |
| // Process and emit the event | |
| this.$emit(event, { | |
| summary: `New ${event.type} event received`, | |
| ts: Date.now(), | |
| }); | |
| } catch (error) { | |
| this.handleError(error); | |
| } | |
| }, | |
| }; |
| @@ -0,0 +1,14 @@ | |||
| import sdk from "../../sdk.app.mjs"; | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
SDK import missing required methods
The sdk.app.mjs no longer exports authKeys. Please update the import and usage accordingly.
🔗 Analysis chain
Verify SDK import and available methods
Let's ensure the SDK import path is correct and verify the available methods after the removal of authKeys.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify SDK import path and exported members
# Check if sdk.app.mjs exists and show its exports
fd -e mjs -e js "sdk.app" -x cat {} \; | grep -A 5 "export"
# Find all SDK imports across the codebase for consistency
rg "import.*sdk.*from.*sdk\.app"
Length of output: 20439
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 8
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (7)
components/sdk/sources/nextjs-event-received/nextjs-event-received.mjs (2)
8-10: Props configuration needs enhancementThe props section only includes the SDK but lacks configuration options that might be needed for Next.js specific functionality (e.g., endpoint path, authentication options).
Consider adding Next.js specific configuration props:
props: { sdk, + path: { + type: "string", + label: "Endpoint Path", + description: "The path where your Next.js endpoint will receive events", + default: "/api/pipedream" + }, + http: { + type: "$.interface.http", + customResponse: true + } },
1-14: Add documentation for SDK integrationThe component would benefit from JSDoc comments explaining how to integrate this with a Next.js application.
Add documentation at the top of the file:
+ /** + * @description This component creates an HTTP endpoint that receives events from your Next.js application + * @example + * // In your Next.js API route (e.g., pages/api/event.js): + * import { PipedreamSDK } from '@pipedream/sdk' + * + * export default async function handler(req, res) { + * const pd = new PipedreamSDK() + * await pd.emit({ + * event: req.body, + * metadata: { source: 'nextjs-app' } + * }) + * res.status(200).json({ success: true }) + * } + */ import sdk from "../../sdk.app.mjs";components/sdk/sources/nodejs-event-received/nodejs-event-received.mjs (1)
8-10: Consider adding configuration optionsThe component could benefit from additional props to allow users to customize its behavior. Common options might include:
- Event filtering criteria
- Rate limiting settings
- Custom headers or metadata
components/sdk/sources/nuxtjs-event-received/nuxtjs-event-received.mjs (3)
1-1: Consider using explicit import pathThe relative import path
../../sdk.app.mjsmight be fragile if the file structure changes. Consider using a more explicit import path from the package root.-import sdk from "../../sdk.app.mjs"; +import sdk from "@pipedream/sdk/sdk.app.mjs";
8-11: Document SDK prop requirementsThe
sdkprop is imported but its required configuration and usage are not documented. Consider adding JSDoc comments to clarify the expected setup.props: { + /** + * @required + * @description Pipedream SDK instance for handling Nuxt.js events + * @type {import('@pipedream/sdk').SDK} + */ sdk, },
1-14: Add integration documentationThe component lacks documentation about how to integrate it with a Nuxt.js application. Consider adding JSDoc comments or a README with:
- Installation instructions
- Configuration examples
- Usage patterns
- Event format specifications
Would you like me to help create a documentation template?
components/sdk/sources/reactjs-event-received/reactjs-event-received.mjs (1)
4-11: Enhance component documentation and metadataThe component metadata could be more informative to help developers understand:
- What types of events this component will emit
- How it integrates with React.js applications
- Any configuration requirements or prerequisites
Consider expanding the description and adding JSDoc comments:
+/** + * @description React.js SDK event source component that emits events from React applications + * to Pipedream workflows. + * @param {Object} sdk - The Pipedream SDK instance + * @example + * // Example of how this source will be used in a React application + * import { pd } from '@pipedream/sdk' + * + * // Usage example + */ export default { name: "New Event Received from the React.js Pipedream SDK", version: "0.0.1", key: "sdk-reactjs-event-received", - description: "Emit new event via the React.js Pipedream SDK.", + description: "Emits events from React.js applications to Pipedream workflows. Use this source to process and respond to events from your React frontend.", props: { sdk, },
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (6)
components/sdk/sources/nextjs-event-received/nextjs-event-received.mjs(1 hunks)components/sdk/sources/nodejs-event-received/nodejs-event-received.mjs(1 hunks)components/sdk/sources/nuxtjs-event-received/nuxtjs-event-received.mjs(1 hunks)components/sdk/sources/python-event-received/python-event-received.mjs(1 hunks)components/sdk/sources/reactjs-event-received/reactjs-event-received.mjs(1 hunks)components/sdk/sources/vue-event-received/vue-event-received.mjs(1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- components/sdk/sources/python-event-received/python-event-received.mjs
🔇 Additional comments (6)
components/sdk/sources/vue-event-received/vue-event-received.mjs (2)
1-1: LGTM! Import statement follows ES module conventions.
12-13:
Implementation required for source component functionality.
The empty methods and run() implementation needs:
- Event emission logic
- Error handling
- Input validation
- Rate limiting
- Logging
Would you like me to:
- Generate a basic implementation template with these requirements?
- Open a GitHub issue to track the implementation tasks?
components/sdk/sources/nextjs-event-received/nextjs-event-received.mjs (1)
1-1: Verify SDK import path resolution
The relative import path assumes a specific directory structure. Let's verify this path resolves correctly.
✅ Verification successful
SDK import path resolved correctly
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the SDK import path exists and is correctly structured
# Expected: Find the sdk.app.mjs file two directories up from this component
# Check if the SDK file exists at the specified path
fd -p "components/sdk/sdk.app.mjs$"
# Examine the SDK file structure to ensure it exports what we need
if [ -f "components/sdk/sdk.app.mjs" ]; then
echo "SDK file content:"
cat "components/sdk/sdk.app.mjs"
fi
Length of output: 254
components/sdk/sources/nodejs-event-received/nodejs-event-received.mjs (2)
1-1: LGTM! Import statement is correct.
1-14: Verify SDK integration and usage patterns
Let's verify how this component integrates with other SDK components and identify any existing usage patterns.
✅ Verification successful
SDK integration and usage patterns are consistent and correctly implemented
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for similar source components to ensure consistent patterns
echo "Checking for similar source components..."
fd -e mjs -e js -e ts "event-received" components/sdk/sources
# Search for SDK usage patterns
echo "Checking SDK usage patterns..."
rg -t js -t mjs "sdk\..*" components/sdk/sources -A 3
Length of output: 731
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Define mjs as JavaScript and search for SDK usage patterns
rg --type-add 'mjs:*.mjs' -t mjs 'sdk\..*' components/sdk/sources -A 3
Length of output: 2467
components/sdk/sources/reactjs-event-received/reactjs-event-received.mjs (1)
1-2: Verify SDK import path consistency across framework components
The SDK import path looks correct, but let's verify it's consistent across all new framework components.
✅ Verification successful
SDK import path is consistent across all framework components.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check SDK import consistency across all framework components
# Expected: All components should use the same relative path to import the SDK
# Search for SDK import statements in all framework components
fd . components/sdk/sources --type f -e mjs -e js | xargs rg "import.*sdk.*from.*sdk\.app"
Length of output: 736
| export default { | ||
| name: "New Event Received from the Next.js Pipedream SDK", | ||
| version: "0.0.1", | ||
| key: "sdk-nextjs-event-received", | ||
| description: "Emit new event via the Next.js Pipedream SDK.", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Component metadata needs version alignment
The component version (0.0.1) should align with the SDK version (0.1.0) mentioned in the PR summary for consistency.
name: "New Event Received from the Next.js Pipedream SDK",
- version: "0.0.1",
+ version: "0.1.0",
key: "sdk-nextjs-event-received",📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| export default { | |
| name: "New Event Received from the Next.js Pipedream SDK", | |
| version: "0.0.1", | |
| key: "sdk-nextjs-event-received", | |
| description: "Emit new event via the Next.js Pipedream SDK.", | |
| export default { | |
| name: "New Event Received from the Next.js Pipedream SDK", | |
| version: "0.1.0", | |
| key: "sdk-nextjs-event-received", | |
| description: "Emit new event via the Next.js Pipedream SDK.", |
| type: "source", | ||
| methods: {}, | ||
| async run() {}, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Empty methods object and run implementation
The component has an empty methods object and run function, which makes it non-functional in its current state.
The source component needs at least:
- Basic event handling in the run method
- Helper methods for processing Next.js specific requests
- Error handling
Here's a suggested implementation:
type: "source",
- methods: {},
- async run() {},
+ methods: {
+ generateMeta(event) {
+ return {
+ id: event.id || uuid(),
+ summary: "New Next.js Event",
+ ts: Date.now(),
+ };
+ },
+ },
+ async run(event) {
+ const { body, headers } = event;
+
+ if (!body) {
+ throw new Error("No event body received");
+ }
+
+ const meta = this.generateMeta(body);
+ this.$emit(body, meta);
+
+ return {
+ status: 200,
+ body: {
+ success: true,
+ },
+ };
+ },Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
| type: "source", | ||
| methods: {}, | ||
| async run() {}, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Implement the run() method
The run() method is currently empty. It should:
- Handle incoming events
- Include proper error handling
- Implement retry logic for failed operations
- Add logging for debugging purposes
Would you like me to help create a basic implementation with these features?
Add input validation
Consider adding validation methods to verify incoming events before processing:
methods: {
validateEvent(event) {
// Add validation logic
},
},| name: "New Event Received from the Node.js Pipedream SDK", | ||
| version: "0.0.1", | ||
| key: "sdk-nodejs-event-received", | ||
| description: "Emit new event via the Node.js Pipedream SDK.", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Version number should match SDK version
The component version (0.0.1) is inconsistent with the SDK version (0.1.0) mentioned in the changes. Consider aligning these versions for better version tracking.
- version: "0.0.1",
+ version: "0.1.0",Enhance the component description
The current description is quite brief. Consider adding more details about:
- What triggers the event
- What data is emitted
- Common use cases
Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
| methods: {}, | ||
| async run() {}, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Implement required source component methods
The empty methods object and run implementation need to be completed. At minimum, implement:
- Event handling logic in
run - Error handling
- Input validation
- Event emission
Here's a suggested implementation structure:
methods: {
validateEvent(event) {
// Add validation logic
},
async processEvent(event) {
// Add processing logic
}
},
async run({ event }) {
try {
this.validateEvent(event);
await this.processEvent(event);
// Emit the processed event
this.$emit(event, {
summary: `New event received from Nuxt.js SDK`,
ts: Date.now(),
});
} catch (error) {
console.error("Error processing Nuxt.js event:", error);
throw error;
}
}Would you like me to create a GitHub issue to track the implementation of these methods?
| name: "New Event Received from the Nuxt.js Pipedream SDK", | ||
| version: "0.0.1", | ||
| key: "sdk-nuxtjs-event-received", | ||
| description: "Emit new event via the Nuxt.js Pipedream SDK.", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Version inconsistency detected
The component version (0.0.1) doesn't match the SDK package version (0.1.0) mentioned in the summary. This might cause confusion about compatibility.
- version: "0.0.1",
+ version: "0.1.0",📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| name: "New Event Received from the Nuxt.js Pipedream SDK", | |
| version: "0.0.1", | |
| key: "sdk-nuxtjs-event-received", | |
| description: "Emit new event via the Nuxt.js Pipedream SDK.", | |
| name: "New Event Received from the Nuxt.js Pipedream SDK", | |
| version: "0.1.0", | |
| key: "sdk-nuxtjs-event-received", | |
| description: "Emit new event via the Nuxt.js Pipedream SDK.", |
| import sdk from "../../sdk.app.mjs"; | ||
|
|
||
| export default { | ||
| name: "New Event Received from the Nuxt.js Pipedream SDK", | ||
| version: "0.0.1", | ||
| key: "sdk-nuxtjs-event-received", | ||
| description: "Emit new event via the Nuxt.js Pipedream SDK.", | ||
| props: { | ||
| sdk, | ||
| }, | ||
| type: "source", | ||
| methods: {}, | ||
| async run() {}, | ||
| }; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Component 'sdk-nuxtjs-event-received' Not Registered in SDK's Component Registry
The component is not referenced in any SDK registry or main export files.
🔗 Analysis chain
Verify component registration
Let's verify if this component is properly registered in the SDK's component registry.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if the component is registered in the SDK's main exports or component registry
# Look for component registration files
echo "Searching for component registration files..."
fd -e json -e js -e mjs -t f "registry|index|main" --full-path components/sdk
# Check if this component is referenced in any of these files
rg -l "sdk-nuxtjs-event-received" components/sdk
Length of output: 300
| methods: {}, | ||
| async run() {}, | ||
| }; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Implementation required: Add core source component functionality
The component is currently a skeleton without implementation. A source component typically needs:
- Event emission handling
- Error handling and validation
- Lifecycle methods (e.g., deploy, dedupe)
Would you like me to help create a basic implementation with these essential features? I can also create a GitHub issue to track this implementation task.
Additionally, consider adding these method stubs:
type: "source",
- methods: {},
+ methods: {
+ // Emit events received from React.js applications
+ async emitEvent(event) {
+ // TODO: Implement event emission logic
+ },
+ // Validate incoming events
+ validateEvent(event) {
+ // TODO: Implement event validation
+ },
+ },
- async run() {},
+ async run(event) {
+ // TODO: Implement main event processing logic
+ // 1. Validate incoming event
+ // 2. Process event data
+ // 3. Emit event to workflow
+ },Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
WHY
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
authKeysmethod to enhance security by eliminating access to authentication keys.