Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

15308 action unthread create conversation #15345

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jan 21, 2025

Conversation

luancazarine
Copy link
Collaborator

@luancazarine luancazarine commented Jan 20, 2025

Resolves #15308

Summary by CodeRabbit

Release Notes

  • New Features

    • Added a new action for creating conversations with advanced configuration options
    • Introduced constants for status and priority options
    • Enhanced user and customer management capabilities
  • Improvements

    • Updated package version and platform dependency
    • Improved pagination and user listing functionality
  • Version Updates

    • Package version bumped from 0.1.0 to 0.2.0
    • Platform dependency updated to ^3.0.3

@luancazarine luancazarine linked an issue Jan 20, 2025 that may be closed by this pull request
Copy link

vercel bot commented Jan 20, 2025

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

3 Skipped Deployments
Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
docs-v2 ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Visit Preview Jan 20, 2025 8:56pm
pipedream-docs ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Jan 20, 2025 8:56pm
pipedream-docs-redirect-do-not-edit ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Jan 20, 2025 8:56pm

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 20, 2025

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@luancazarine has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 19 minutes and 13 seconds before requesting another review.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between fef4984 and 4956497.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • components/unthread/actions/create-conversation/create-conversation.mjs (1 hunks)

Walkthrough

This pull request introduces a new module for creating conversations in the Unthread application. The changes include adding a new create-conversation.mjs action with comprehensive configuration options for different conversation types (triage and email). Additionally, the PR updates version numbers across several action modules, introduces new constants for status and priority options, and modifies the main application file to support user and conversation management.

Changes

File Change Summary
components/unthread/actions/create-conversation/create-conversation.mjs New action module for creating conversations with type-specific properties and validation
components/unthread/actions/create-customer/create-customer.mjs Version updated from 0.0.1 to 0.0.2
components/unthread/actions/delete-customer/delete-customer.mjs Version updated from 0.0.1 to 0.0.2
components/unthread/actions/update-customer/update-customer.mjs Version updated from 0.0.1 to 0.0.2
components/unthread/common/constants.mjs Added new constants: LIMIT, STATUS_OPTIONS, PRIORITY_OPTIONS
components/unthread/package.json Package version updated to 0.2.0, platform dependency updated to ^3.0.3
components/unthread/unthread.app.mjs Significant updates to prop definitions and methods, including new userId property and listUsers method

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Create conversation action for Unthread
Support email conversation type
Configurable onBehalfOf parameters

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

user submitted, ai-assisted

Suggested reviewers

  • GTFalcao
  • jcortes

Poem

🐰 In the realm of threads unbound,
A conversation action is found!
With types that dance and properties bright,
We weave connections, pure delight!
Code hops forward, version takes flight! 🚀


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
components/unthread/actions/create-conversation/create-conversation.mjs (1)

108-114: Improve type checking in additionalProps method.

The method directly accesses this.type without checking if it's defined, which could lead to runtime errors.

Apply this diff to add type checking:

  async additionalProps(props) {
-   const isTriage = this.type === "triage";
+   const type = this.type ?? "";
+   const isTriage = type === "triage";
    props.triageChannelId.hidden = !isTriage;
    props.emailInboxId.hidden = isTriage;

    return {};
  },
components/unthread/unthread.app.mjs (2)

12-33: Consider adding error handling for user listing.

The options method for userId prop should handle potential API errors to provide better feedback.

Apply this diff to add error handling:

      async options({ prevContext }) {
+       try {
          const {
            data, cursors,
          } = await this.listUsers({
            data: {
              limit: LIMIT,
              cursor: prevContext.nextCursor,
            },
          });

+         if (!data?.length) {
+           return {
+             options: [],
+             context: { nextCursor: null },
+           };
+         }

          return {
            options: data.map(({
              id: value, email: label,
            }) => ({
              label,
              value,
            })),
            context: {
              nextCursor: cursors.next,
            },
          };
+       } catch (error) {
+         console.error('Failed to fetch users:', error);
+         return {
+           options: [],
+           context: { nextCursor: null },
+         };
+       }
      },

122-128: Add JSDoc comments for new methods.

The newly added methods createConversation and listUsers lack documentation about their parameters and return values.

Apply this diff to add JSDoc comments:

+   /**
+    * Creates a new conversation
+    * @param {Object} args - The conversation creation arguments
+    * @param {Object} args.data - The conversation data
+    * @returns {Promise<Object>} The created conversation
+    */
    createConversation(args = {}) {
      return this._makeRequest({
        method: "post",
        path: "/conversations",
        ...args,
      });
    },

+   /**
+    * Lists users with pagination support
+    * @param {Object} args - The listing arguments
+    * @param {Object} args.data - The query parameters
+    * @param {number} args.data.limit - Maximum number of users to return
+    * @param {string} [args.data.cursor] - Cursor for pagination
+    * @returns {Promise<Object>} The users list response
+    */
    listUsers(args = {}) {
      return this._makeRequest({
        method: "post",
        path: "/users/list",
        ...args,
      });
    },

Also applies to: 154-167

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 5f880bd and fef4984.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • pnpm-lock.yaml is excluded by !**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (7)
  • components/unthread/actions/create-conversation/create-conversation.mjs (1 hunks)
  • components/unthread/actions/create-customer/create-customer.mjs (1 hunks)
  • components/unthread/actions/delete-customer/delete-customer.mjs (1 hunks)
  • components/unthread/actions/update-customer/update-customer.mjs (1 hunks)
  • components/unthread/common/constants.mjs (1 hunks)
  • components/unthread/package.json (2 hunks)
  • components/unthread/unthread.app.mjs (5 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (4)
  • components/unthread/actions/update-customer/update-customer.mjs
  • components/unthread/actions/create-customer/create-customer.mjs
  • components/unthread/common/constants.mjs
  • components/unthread/actions/delete-customer/delete-customer.mjs
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (3)
  • GitHub Check: pnpm publish
  • GitHub Check: Publish TypeScript components
  • GitHub Check: Verify TypeScript components
🔇 Additional comments (3)
components/unthread/package.json (2)

3-3: LGTM! Version bump follows semver.

The minor version increment (0.1.0 → 0.2.0) appropriately reflects the addition of new conversation creation functionality.


16-16: Verify compatibility with @pipedream/platform v3.x.x.

The major version jump (1.x.x → 3.x.x) in the platform dependency suggests breaking changes. Please ensure:

  1. All breaking changes have been addressed
  2. Migration steps have been documented
  3. Existing functionality remains compatible
components/unthread/unthread.app.mjs (1)

77-81: Verify the triageChannelId documentation link.

The documentation link in the description should be verified to ensure it's accessible and points to the correct section.

✅ Verification successful

Documentation link is valid and accessible

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the documentation link for triageChannelId
# Test: Check if the documentation link is accessible
curl -I "https://docs.unthread.io/account-setup/connect-channels"

Length of output: 1499

…ation.mjs

Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Copy link
Collaborator

@michelle0927 michelle0927 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

@vunguyenhung vunguyenhung merged commit 130c276 into master Jan 21, 2025
11 checks passed
@vunguyenhung vunguyenhung deleted the 15308-action-unthread---create-conversation branch January 21, 2025 01:52
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[ACTION] Unthread - Create conversation
3 participants