Multi-valued simple type validation #74
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
s-andringa
changed the title
s-andringa
force-pushed
the
multi-valued-simple-type-validation
branch
from
a06a145
to
c68a041
Compare
s-andringa
force-pushed
the
multi-valued-simple-type-validation
branch
from
c68a041
to
92b5042
Compare
|
It's somewhat related to #55, where someone tried to define an attribute with type 'array'. |
|
This is now available via RubyGems in v2.6.0 / v1.7.0. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Hi @pond,
This one fixes an issue where a multi-valued string attribute did not accept an array of strings because validation of simple types didn't account for the
multiValuedproperty. We use such an attribute in a custom schema extension, and it should be possible within the specification. (There are even some standard attributes that are arrays of simple types, for instancereferenceTypes.)Thanks again,
Sjoerd