Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

XS✔ ◾ Brainstorming teams - Add share team allocations bit #7193

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 6, 2023
Merged

XS✔ ◾ Brainstorming teams - Add share team allocations bit #7193

merged 1 commit into from
Nov 6, 2023

Conversation

bradystroud
Copy link
Member

  1. What triggered this change? (PBI link, Email Subject, conversation + reason, etc)

✏️ I saw it was missing

  1. What was changed?

✏️ added that you share team allocations

  1. Did you do pair or mob programming?

✏️ no

@bradystroud bradystroud enabled auto-merge (squash) November 6, 2023 23:27
@github-actions github-actions bot added the Age: 🥚 - New About 2 hours old label Nov 6, 2023
@github-actions GitHub Actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Nov 6, 2023

PR Metrics

✔ Thanks for keeping your pull request small.
✔ Thanks for adding tests.

Lines
Product Code 0
Test Code 0
Subtotal 0
Ignored Code 11
Total 11

Metrics computed by PR Metrics. Add it to your Azure DevOps and GitHub PRs!

@github-actions github-actions bot changed the title Brainstorming teams - Add share team allocations bit XS✔ ◾ Brainstorming teams - Add share team allocations bit Nov 6, 2023
@bradystroud bradystroud merged commit 2cda7ef into main Nov 6, 2023
6 checks passed
@bradystroud bradystroud deleted the bradystroud-patch-3 branch November 6, 2023 23:29
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@BrookJeynes BrookJeynes BrookJeynes approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
Age: 🥚 - New About 2 hours old
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@bradystroud @BrookJeynes