XS✔ ◾ Removing "as per our conversation" as related rule due to redundancy #7574
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
sethdaily
requested changes
Dec 15, 2023
There was a problem hiding this comment.
cc @bradystroud
Are you sure we don't leave them in the related section?
sethdaily
approved these changes
Dec 15, 2023
PR Metrics✔ Thanks for keeping your pull request small.
Metrics computed by PR Metrics. Add it to your Azure DevOps and GitHub PRs! |
github-actions
bot
changed the title
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Tip: Use SSW Rule Writer GPT for help with writing rules 🤖
Email Subject: Salary terminology rule - remove duplicate link
removed the "as per our conversation" rule from related rules as it was already mentioned in the content body. Therefore was a duplicate
No.