Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

XS✔ ◾ Add Workflow to Trigger Rules Build #8466

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 29, 2024
Merged

Conversation

Aibono1225
Copy link
Member

@Aibono1225 Aibono1225 commented Apr 29, 2024

  1. What triggered this change? (PBI link, Email Subject, conversation + reason, etc)

✏️ Relates to SSWConsulting/SSW.Rules#1292

  1. What was changed?

✏️ Added a new workflow to trigger rules build

  1. Did you do pair or mob programming (list names)?

✏️ @wicksipedia

@github-actions github-actions bot added the Age: 🥚 - New About 2 hours old label Apr 29, 2024
@Aibono1225 Aibono1225 changed the title add workflow to trigger rules build Add Workflow to Trigger Rules Build Apr 29, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

PR Metrics

Thanks for keeping your pull request small.
Thanks for adding tests.

Lines
Product Code -
Test Code -
Subtotal -
Ignored Code 18
Total 18

Metrics computed by PR Metrics. Add it to your Azure DevOps and GitHub PRs!

@github-actions github-actions bot changed the title Add Workflow to Trigger Rules Build XS✔ ◾ Add Workflow to Trigger Rules Build Apr 29, 2024
@Aibono1225 Aibono1225 added the code change Code changes for scripts on this repo - Only review if you are developer label Apr 29, 2024
@wicksipedia wicksipedia merged commit 2003104 into main Apr 29, 2024
6 checks passed
@wicksipedia wicksipedia deleted the trigger-rules-build branch April 29, 2024 05:47
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Age: 🥚 - New About 2 hours old code change Code changes for scripts on this repo - Only review if you are developer
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants