Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Introducing base classes for more byte codes #283

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 28, 2024

Conversation

zherczeg
Copy link
Collaborator

Similar to the patch which was landed before.

@@ -850,7 +850,7 @@ static void emitStore(sljit_compiler* compiler, Instruction* instr)

if (instr->opcode() != ByteCode::Store32Opcode && instr->opcode() != ByteCode::Store64Opcode) {
#ifdef HAS_SIMD
if (opcode != 0) {
if (opcode != 0 || size == 16) {
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This was an actual bug which was revealed by this rework.

Copy link
Collaborator

@clover2123 clover2123 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM
(please check the code formattingcheck-tidy)

@zherczeg
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Thank you for the review. Patch is updated.

@clover2123 clover2123 merged commit a9512ed into Samsung:main Aug 28, 2024
14 checks passed
@zherczeg zherczeg deleted the common_base2 branch August 28, 2024 04:23
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants