Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[WIP] APIv4 server #5691

Closed
wants to merge 40 commits into from
Closed

[WIP] APIv4 server #5691

wants to merge 40 commits into from

Conversation

touilleMan
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@touilleMan touilleMan requested review from a team as code owners November 2, 2023 01:41
@FirelightFlagboy FirelightFlagboy marked this pull request as draft November 2, 2023 07:44
@@ -61,7 +61,7 @@ async def backend_app_factory(


@attr.s(slots=True, auto_attribs=True, kw_only=True, eq=False, repr=False)
class BackendApp:
class Backend:
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The renaming could be done in another PR

@touilleMan touilleMan force-pushed the apiv4-server branch 3 times, most recently from 6d9132b to 62f75ae Compare November 5, 2023 09:09
@mmmarcos mmmarcos mentioned this pull request Nov 7, 2023
@touilleMan touilleMan force-pushed the apiv4-server branch 12 times, most recently from 0ee7d1e to a5e6d54 Compare November 13, 2023 21:20
- realm_rotate_key never_legacy_reencrypted_or_fail flag
- various corrections in error status
- realm_rename initial_name_or_fail flag
- semi-deprecated workspaces field in local user manifest
- fix invalide type name for RealmNameCertificate
…cate data schemas (backport from Parsec v2.16)
…acy_device_file_password/local_folder_manifest data schemas to correctly use introduce_in_revision field
@touilleMan touilleMan mentioned this pull request Jan 22, 2024
5 tasks
@touilleMan
Copy link
Member Author

replaced by #6214

@touilleMan touilleMan closed this Jan 22, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[🦀 Oxidation] Fix protocols tests for APIv4
3 participants