-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat(trace-details): frontend changes for trace details #6905
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
Build Error! No Linked Issue found. Please link an issue or mention it in the body using #<issue_id> |
Build Error! No Linked Issue found. Please link an issue or mention it in the body using #<issue_id> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
❌ Changes requested. Reviewed everything up to aaa4529 in 1 minute and 57 seconds
More details
- Looked at
4290
lines of code in47
files - Skipped
3
files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
2
drafted comments based on config settings.
1. frontend/src/pages/TraceDetail/TraceDetail.styles.scss:17
- Draft comment:
Avoid using hardcoded color values like#c0c1c3
. Use design tokens or predefined color constants instead. This issue is also present on line 30. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Marked as duplicate.
2. frontend/src/pages/TraceDetailV2/NoData/NoData.styles.scss:22
- Draft comment:
Avoid using hardcoded color values like#c0c1c3
. Use design tokens or predefined color constants instead. This issue is also present on line 30. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Marked as duplicate.
Workflow ID: wflow_nIGb0AKprzZ1c5Y5
Want Ellipsis to fix these issues? Tag @ellipsis-dev
in a comment. You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet
mode, and more.
frontend/src/container/TraceWaterfall/TraceWaterfallStates/Success/Success.tsx
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
👍 Looks good to me! Incremental review on 7eb044d in 44 seconds
More details
- Looked at
68
lines of code in5
files - Skipped
0
files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
2
drafted comments based on config settings.
1. frontend/src/container/PaginatedTraceFlamegraph/constants.ts:6
- Draft comment:
Typo in 'FETCHING_WTIH_OLD_DATA_PRESENT'. It should be 'FETCHING_WITH_OLD_DATA_PRESENT'. This typo is also present inTraceWaterfallStates
inTraceWaterfall/constants.ts
. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment was on unchanged code.
2. frontend/src/hooks/trace/useGetTraceFlamegraph.tsx:13
- Draft comment:
The return typeUseLicense
is misleading. Consider renaming it to something more appropriate likeUseTraceFlamegraph
. This also applies touseGetTraceV2.tsx
. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment was on unchanged code.
Workflow ID: wflow_zwLOyMcuHqPAqqiq
You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet
mode, and more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
👍 Looks good to me! Incremental review on 8d85036 in 1 minute and 13 seconds
More details
- Looked at
1889
lines of code in19
files - Skipped
0
files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
8
drafted comments based on config settings.
1. frontend/src/container/PaginatedTraceFlamegraph/PaginatedTraceFlamegraph.tsx:125
- Draft comment:
Ensurespread
is not zero before performing division to prevent runtime errors. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment did not seem useful.
2. frontend/src/container/SpanDetailsDrawer/SpanDetailsDrawer.tsx:39
- Draft comment:
Consider usinguseCallback
to memoize thegetItems
function to avoid unnecessary re-creations on every render. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:50%
InSpanDetailsDrawer.tsx
, thegetItems
function is defined inside the component, which can lead to unnecessary re-creations of the function on every render. This can be optimized by moving the function outside the component or usinguseCallback
to memoize it.
3. frontend/src/pages/TraceDetailV2/TraceDetailV2.tsx:36
- Draft comment:
Consider checking if thespanId
has actually changed before updating theinterestedSpanId
state to avoid unnecessary updates. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:50%
InTraceDetailV2.tsx
, theuseEffect
hook on line 36 is used to update theinterestedSpanId
state wheneverurlQuery
changes. However, this can lead to unnecessary updates ifurlQuery
does not actually change thespanId
. It would be more efficient to check if thespanId
has changed before updating the state.
4. frontend/src/container/PaginatedTraceFlamegraph/PaginatedTraceFlamegraph.tsx:121
- Draft comment:
Avoid using inline styles. Consider using CSS classes or styled components instead. This comment applies to other inline styles in this file as well. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable:
While generally avoiding inline styles is good practice, these particular inline styles are being used for dynamic width calculations based on a prop. This is actually a legitimate use case for inline styles since these values need to be computed at runtime. Moving these to CSS classes wouldn't make sense since the values are dynamic.
I might be too quick to dismiss the possibility of handling dynamic widths through CSS variables or styled components. There could be cleaner ways to handle this layout.
While CSS variables could be used, the current approach is simple and clear for this specific use case of dynamic width calculations. The complexity added by alternative approaches wouldn't provide significant benefits.
The comment should be deleted as it's suggesting a change that wouldn't improve the code. The inline styles here are being used appropriately for dynamic width calculations.
5. frontend/src/container/PaginatedTraceFlamegraph/PaginatedTraceFlamegraph.tsx:159
- Draft comment:
Avoid using inline styles. Consider using CSS classes or styled components instead. This comment applies to other inline styles in this file as well. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Marked as duplicate.
6. frontend/src/container/SpanDetailsDrawer/SpanDetailsDrawer.tsx:122
- Draft comment:
Avoid using inline styles. Consider using CSS classes or styled components instead. This comment applies to other inline styles in this file as well. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Marked as duplicate.
7. frontend/src/container/TraceWaterfall/TraceWaterfallStates/Success/Success.tsx:92
- Draft comment:
Avoid using inline styles. Consider using CSS classes or styled components instead. This comment applies to other inline styles in this file as well. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Marked as duplicate.
8. frontend/src/pages/TraceDetailV2/TraceDetailV2.tsx:113
- Draft comment:
Avoid using inline styles. Consider using CSS classes or styled components instead. This comment applies to other inline styles in this file as well. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Marked as duplicate.
Workflow ID: wflow_01ILJl5qdJs2prM1
You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet
mode, and more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
❌ Changes requested. Incremental review on a99f293 in 1 minute and 7 seconds
More details
- Looked at
409
lines of code in9
files - Skipped
0
files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
3
drafted comments based on config settings.
1. frontend/src/container/PaginatedTraceFlamegraph/TraceFlamegraphStates/Success/Success.tsx:80
- Draft comment:
Avoid using inline styles. Use CSS classes or styled components instead. This applies to other inline styles in this file as well. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment was on unchanged code.
2. frontend/src/container/PaginatedTraceFlamegraph/TraceFlamegraphStates/Success/Success.tsx:72
- Draft comment:
Use design tokens or predefined color constants instead of hardcoding color values. This applies to other hardcoded colors in this file as well. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment was on unchanged code.
3. frontend/src/pages/TraceDetailV2/TraceDetailV2.styles.scss:28
- Draft comment:
Use design tokens or predefined color constants instead of hardcoding color values. This applies to other hardcoded colors in this file as well. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Marked as duplicate.
Workflow ID: wflow_FkuoBr2SN22UqMDa
Want Ellipsis to fix these issues? Tag @ellipsis-dev
in a comment. You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet
mode, and more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
👍 Looks good to me! Incremental review on 700ff3a in 54 seconds
More details
- Looked at
226
lines of code in5
files - Skipped
0
files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
4
drafted comments based on config settings.
1. frontend/src/container/PaginatedTraceFlamegraph/TraceFlamegraphStates/Success/Success.tsx:62
- Draft comment:
Ensure that thegenerateColor
function is compatible withthemeColors.traceDetailColors
. Also, consider the impact of commented-outisDarkMode
logic on theming consistency. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:50%
The use ofgenerateColor
function withthemeColors.traceDetailColors
is consistent across multiple files. However, thegenerateColor
function's implementation should be checked to ensure it handles the new color set correctly. Additionally, theisDarkMode
variable is used to adjust colors, but its usage is commented out in some places, which might lead to inconsistent theming.
2. frontend/src/container/TraceWaterfall/TraceWaterfallStates/Success/Success.tsx:63
- Draft comment:
TheisDarkMode
variable is imported but not used. Consider removing it if it's not needed. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:50%
TheisDarkMode
variable is imported but not used in this file. This might be an oversight or a leftover from previous code changes.
3. frontend/src/container/TraceWaterfall/TraceWaterfallStates/Success/Success.tsx:90
- Draft comment:
TheborderImage
property is commented out. Consider removing it if not needed or add a comment explaining its purpose for future reference. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:33%
TheborderImage
property is commented out, which might be intentional for future use or testing. However, it should be either removed or properly documented if it's not going to be used.
4. frontend/src/container/TraceWaterfall/TraceWaterfallStates/Success/Success.tsx:89
- Draft comment:
Avoid using inline styles in React components. Move styles to external stylesheets or styled components. This applies to other instances in this file as well. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment was not on a valid diff hunk.
Workflow ID: wflow_8pFTNdwHCRsuPMDF
You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet
mode, and more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
👍 Looks good to me! Incremental review on abdd1f7 in 44 seconds
More details
- Looked at
96
lines of code in6
files - Skipped
0
files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
2
drafted comments based on config settings.
1. frontend/src/pages/TraceDetailV2/TraceDetailV2.tsx:34
- Draft comment:
Remove the console.log statement to clean up the code.
```
- Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment looked like it was already resolved.
2. frontend/src/pages/TraceDetailV2/TraceDetailV2.tsx:33
- Draft comment:
Remove the unnecessary console.log statement for cleaner code.
```
- Reason this comment was not posted:
Marked as duplicate.
Workflow ID: wflow_E5H5Tcx4MyPMz3Fm
You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet
mode, and more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
👍 Looks good to me! Incremental review on 4b14ac6 in 1 minute and 8 seconds
More details
- Looked at
344
lines of code in9
files - Skipped
0
files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
3
drafted comments based on config settings.
1. frontend/src/pages/TraceDetailV2/TraceDetailV2.tsx:61
- Draft comment:
The useEffect hook here is redundant as it duplicates the logic already present in the useEffect hook on line 55. Consider removing this useEffect to avoid unnecessary re-renders. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable:
The comment claims the useEffect hooks are redundant, but they're clearly handling different state variables and responding to different dependencies. The first handles uncollapsedNodes based on traceData, while the second handles isSpanDetailsDocked based on selectedSpan. There's no duplication here.
Could there be some indirect relationship between these effects that I'm missing? Maybe the traceData changes could indirectly affect selectedSpan?
Even if there were indirect relationships, the effects serve distinct purposes and modify different state variables. They are logically separate concerns that should remain separate.
The comment is incorrect - these useEffect hooks serve different purposes and are not redundant. The comment should be deleted.
2. frontend/src/pages/TraceDetailV2/TraceDetailV2.tsx:58
- Draft comment:
Ensure that traceData is not null or undefined before accessing its properties to avoid potential runtime errors. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment did not seem useful.
3. frontend/src/pages/TraceDetailV2/TraceDetailV2.tsx:58
- Draft comment:
Avoid using inline styles. Use external stylesheets, CSS classes, or styled components instead for better maintainability and consistency. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment was not on a valid diff hunk.
Workflow ID: wflow_DpwAhk495PdVjJ0I
You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet
mode, and more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
👍 Looks good to me! Incremental review on 02edbd1 in 1 minute and 9 seconds
More details
- Looked at
511
lines of code in12
files - Skipped
0
files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
5
drafted comments based on config settings.
1. frontend/src/container/PaginatedTraceFlamegraph/PaginatedTraceFlamegraph.tsx:8
- Draft comment:
useIsDarkMode
is imported but not used. Consider removing it to clean up the code. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:10%
The use ofuseIsDarkMode
is unnecessary inPaginatedTraceFlamegraph.tsx
since the theme colors are directly accessed fromthemeColors
. This import can be removed to clean up the code.
2. frontend/src/container/SpanDetailsDrawer/SpanDetailsDrawer.tsx:5
- Draft comment:
useIsDarkMode
is imported but not used. Consider removing it to clean up the code. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:10%
TheuseIsDarkMode
hook is imported but not used inSpanDetailsDrawer.tsx
. This is unnecessary and should be removed to clean up the code.
3. frontend/src/container/PaginatedTraceFlamegraph/PaginatedTraceFlamegraph.tsx:124
- Draft comment:
setHoveredSpanId
is a function and does not need to be included in the dependency array ofuseMemo
. Consider removing it. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:50%
TheuseMemo
dependency array inPaginatedTraceFlamegraph.tsx
includessetHoveredSpanId
, which is a function and does not need to be included in the dependency array. This is a common mistake and should be corrected.
4. frontend/src/container/TraceWaterfall/TraceWaterfall.tsx:128
- Draft comment:
setHoveredSpanId
is a function and does not need to be included in the dependency array ofuseMemo
. Consider removing it. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:50%
TheuseMemo
dependency array inTraceWaterfall.tsx
includessetHoveredSpanId
, which is a function and does not need to be included in the dependency array. This is a common mistake and should be corrected.
5. frontend/src/container/PaginatedTraceFlamegraph/PaginatedTraceFlamegraph.tsx:107
- Draft comment:
Avoid using inline styles for setting the width. Consider using CSS classes or styled components instead. This is also applicable at line 134 and 172. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment was on unchanged code.
Workflow ID: wflow_Z00mdLXg4uYzxDCP
You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet
mode, and more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
👍 Looks good to me! Incremental review on cacaadf in 1 minute and 4 seconds
More details
- Looked at
443
lines of code in7
files - Skipped
0
files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
3
drafted comments based on config settings.
1. frontend/src/container/TraceWaterfall/TraceWaterfallStates/Success/Success.tsx:78
- Draft comment:
The variablecolor
is reassigned ifspan.hasError
is true. Consider using a ternary operator for better readability:
const color = span.hasError ? 'var(--bg-cherry-500)' : generateColor(span.serviceName, themeColors.traceDetailColors);
- Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:50%
The PR introduces a new feature for trace details, focusing on frontend changes. The changes are primarily in the styling and component structure for trace details, including flamegraphs, span details, and trace waterfalls. The code seems to be well-structured, but there are a few areas that could be improved for better maintainability and performance.
2. frontend/src/pages/TraceDetailV2/TraceDetailV2.tsx:142
- Draft comment:
TheTabs
component is used with theanimated
prop. Ensure that the animation does not affect performance negatively, especially with large datasets. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:30%
The PR introduces a new feature for trace details, focusing on frontend changes. The changes are primarily in the styling and component structure for trace details, including flamegraphs, span details, and trace waterfalls. The code seems to be well-structured, but there are a few areas that could be improved for better maintainability and performance.
3. frontend/src/container/TraceWaterfall/TraceWaterfallStates/Success/Success.tsx:101
- Draft comment:
Avoid using inline styles. Consider using CSS classes or styled components instead. This is also applicable at line 152. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment was on unchanged code.
Workflow ID: wflow_p2hMWeik9j62AOjZ
You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet
mode, and more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
👍 Looks good to me! Incremental review on 884b5a3 in 54 seconds
More details
- Looked at
367
lines of code in5
files - Skipped
0
files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
7
drafted comments based on config settings.
1. frontend/src/container/PaginatedTraceFlamegraph/PaginatedTraceFlamegraph.tsx:8
- Draft comment:
The removal ofhoveredSpanId
andsetHoveredSpanId
props is consistent with the changes across the codebase. Ensure that this does not affect any hover-related functionality that might be expected in the UI. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:50%
The removal of the hoveredSpanId and setHoveredSpanId props from multiple components is consistent across the codebase. However, the removal of the onMouseEnter and onMouseLeave handlers that used these props should be verified for any unintended side effects. In this case, the removal seems intentional and aligns with the PR description, which suggests a simplification of the component's state management.
2. frontend/src/container/PaginatedTraceFlamegraph/TraceFlamegraphStates/Success/Success.tsx:40
- Draft comment:
The removal ofhoveredSpanId
andsetHoveredSpanId
props is consistent with the changes across the codebase. Ensure that this does not affect any hover-related functionality that might be expected in the UI. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:50%
The removal of the hoveredSpanId and setHoveredSpanId props from multiple components is consistent across the codebase. However, the removal of the onMouseEnter and onMouseLeave handlers that used these props should be verified for any unintended side effects. In this case, the removal seems intentional and aligns with the PR description, which suggests a simplification of the component's state management.
3. frontend/src/container/TraceWaterfall/TraceWaterfall.tsx:45
- Draft comment:
The removal ofhoveredSpanId
andsetHoveredSpanId
props is consistent with the changes across the codebase. Ensure that this does not affect any hover-related functionality that might be expected in the UI. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:50%
The removal of the hoveredSpanId and setHoveredSpanId props from multiple components is consistent across the codebase. However, the removal of the onMouseEnter and onMouseLeave handlers that used these props should be verified for any unintended side effects. In this case, the removal seems intentional and aligns with the PR description, which suggests a simplification of the component's state management.
4. frontend/src/container/TraceWaterfall/TraceWaterfallStates/Success/Success.tsx:57
- Draft comment:
The removal ofhoveredSpanId
andsetHoveredSpanId
props is consistent with the changes across the codebase. Ensure that this does not affect any hover-related functionality that might be expected in the UI. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:50%
The removal of the hoveredSpanId and setHoveredSpanId props from multiple components is consistent across the codebase. However, the removal of the onMouseEnter and onMouseLeave handlers that used these props should be verified for any unintended side effects. In this case, the removal seems intentional and aligns with the PR description, which suggests a simplification of the component's state management.
5. frontend/src/pages/TraceDetailV2/TraceDetailV2.tsx:34
- Draft comment:
The removal ofhoveredSpanId
andsetHoveredSpanId
props is consistent with the changes across the codebase. Ensure that this does not affect any hover-related functionality that might be expected in the UI. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:50%
The removal of the hoveredSpanId and setHoveredSpanId props from multiple components is consistent across the codebase. However, the removal of the onMouseEnter and onMouseLeave handlers that used these props should be verified for any unintended side effects. In this case, the removal seems intentional and aligns with the PR description, which suggests a simplification of the component's state management.
6. frontend/src/container/PaginatedTraceFlamegraph/TraceFlamegraphStates/Success/Success.tsx:77
- Draft comment:
Avoid using inline styles. Consider using CSS classes or styled components instead. This issue is also present on lines 78 and 80. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment was on unchanged code.
7. frontend/src/container/TraceWaterfall/TraceWaterfallStates/Success/Success.tsx:85
- Draft comment:
Avoid using inline styles. Consider using CSS classes or styled components instead. This issue is also present on lines 103, 105, and 143. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Marked as duplicate.
Workflow ID: wflow_7m6CCi1SAUzdrKdI
You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet
mode, and more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
❌ Changes requested. Incremental review on 5e8be4c in 1 minute and 0 seconds
More details
- Looked at
146
lines of code in2
files - Skipped
0
files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
2
drafted comments based on config settings.
1. frontend/src/container/TraceWaterfall/TraceWaterfallStates/Success/Success.styles.scss:96
- Draft comment:
Avoid using!important
in CSS unless absolutely necessary, as it can lead to specificity issues. Consider refactoring the styles to achieve the desired effect without!important
. This applies to other instances in this file as well. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable:
The !important declarations seem to be used deliberately to handle specific styling cases in a complex component hierarchy. While generally avoiding !important is good practice, in this case it appears to be used intentionally to ensure hover states and backgrounds work correctly across different themes and states. The comment doesn't provide specific alternative solutions.
The comment raises a valid general CSS best practice. The use of !important could make future style changes more difficult.
However, in a complex UI component like this waterfall view, sometimes !important is necessary to guarantee certain styles take precedence, especially for interactive states like hover.
While the comment raises a valid point, it's not actionable enough without suggesting specific alternatives, and the use of !important here appears intentional for handling component states.
2. frontend/src/container/TraceWaterfall/TraceWaterfallStates/Success/Success.tsx:66
- Draft comment:
Ensure that the removal ofuseIsDarkMode
does not affect the intended functionality, as dark mode specific styles are still being used. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment did not seem useful.
Workflow ID: wflow_1A5mbFmWrT7bvRZ6
Want Ellipsis to fix these issues? Tag @ellipsis-dev
in a comment. You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet
mode, and more.
frontend/src/container/TraceWaterfall/TraceWaterfallStates/Success/Success.styles.scss
Show resolved
Hide resolved
frontend/src/container/TraceWaterfall/TraceWaterfallStates/Success/Success.tsx
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
👍 Looks good to me! Incremental review on 4305a21 in 51 seconds
More details
- Looked at
19
lines of code in1
files - Skipped
0
files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
2
drafted comments based on config settings.
1. frontend/src/container/TraceWaterfall/TraceWaterfallStates/Success/Success.styles.scss:99
- Draft comment:
Avoid using!important
unless absolutely necessary, as it can make CSS harder to maintain and debug. Consider refactoring to use more specific selectors or other CSS techniques. This applies to other instances of!important
in this file as well. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable:
The comment is about a real code quality issue - overuse of !important can make CSS harder to maintain. The changes do add new !important declarations. However, looking at the full file context, this appears to be a deliberate pattern used throughout the file for handling background colors and overrides. The !important seems necessary here to override other styles.
The comment may be too general and not specific enough to the changes. It doesn't provide concrete alternatives given the specific override needs in this case.
While avoiding !important is generally good advice, in this case it appears to be a necessary part of the styling system being used, and the new uses are consistent with the existing pattern.
The comment should be deleted as it's making a general code quality suggestion without considering the specific context where !important appears necessary.
2. frontend/src/container/TraceWaterfall/TraceWaterfallStates/Success/Success.styles.scss:96
- Draft comment:
Use design tokens or predefined color constants instead of hardcoding color values likergba(171, 189, 255, 0.06)
to maintain consistency in design and theming. This is also applicable to other hardcoded colors in the file. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment was on unchanged code.
Workflow ID: wflow_O2bLuN8IoHSlgVnW
You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet
mode, and more.
Summary
Related Issues / PR's
contributes to - #6132
Screenshots
NA
Affected Areas and Manually Tested Areas
Important
Introduces a new trace details view with flamegraph and waterfall visualizations, including API integrations and UI components.
TraceDetailV2
page added for enhanced trace details view.TraceFlamegraph
andTraceWaterfall
components for visualizing trace data.getTraceFlamegraph
andgetTraceV2
functions inapi/trace
for fetching trace data.useGetTraceFlamegraph
anduseGetTraceV2
hooks for data fetching.DetailsDrawer
,SpanDetailsDrawer
, andTableV3
components for UI enhancements.Error
,NoData
, andSuccess
states for trace components.TraceDetailV2
andPaginatedTraceFlamegraph
.theme.ts
for trace details.AppRoutes
to include newTraceDetailV2
page.reactQueryKeys
to include new query keys for trace data.This description was created by for 4305a21. It will automatically update as commits are pushed.