Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Scenarios we used in paper that are related to Group Matcher algorithm #397

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Mar 12, 2024
Merged

Scenarios we used in paper that are related to Group Matcher algorithm #397

merged 7 commits into from
Mar 12, 2024

Conversation

ketphan02
Copy link
Collaborator

@ketphan02 ketphan02 commented Mar 11, 2024 •
edited
Loading

Branch out from #331

@ketphan02 ketphan02 self-assigned this Mar 11, 2024
@ketphan02 ketphan02 requested a review from Opeyem1a as a code owner March 11, 2024 23:58
Opeyem1a
Opeyem1a approved these changes Mar 12, 2024
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@Opeyem1a Opeyem1a left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Fix the comment though

benchmarking/evaluations/scenarios/concentrate_timeslots_and_diversify_female_min_of_2.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@ketphan02 ketphan02 merged commit a563b3c into main Mar 12, 2024
7 checks passed
@ketphan02 ketphan02 deleted the scenario-used-in-paper-related-to-group-matcher branch March 12, 2024 04:34
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@Opeyem1a Opeyem1a Opeyem1a approved these changes

@justino599 justino599 Awaiting requested review from justino599

@Hedgemon4 Hedgemon4 Awaiting requested review from Hedgemon4

Assignees

@ketphan02 ketphan02

Labels
benchmarking
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@ketphan02 @Opeyem1a