Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feat bkbase storage #498

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Jan 3, 2025
Merged

Feat bkbase storage #498

merged 4 commits into from
Jan 3, 2025

Conversation

0RAJA
Copy link
Collaborator

@0RAJA 0RAJA commented Jan 3, 2025

0RAJA and others added 4 commits January 2, 2025 10:48
feat: 存储-存储编辑重启 bkbase 入库任务 --story=121354170
fix: 特性开关使用优化 --bug=136100961
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Jan 3, 2025

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 0% with 2 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 63.18%. Comparing base (8c79c7e) to head (33311b5).
Report is 9 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
.../backend/services/web/databus/storage/resources.py 0.00% 2 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #498      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   63.18%   63.18%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         513      513              
  Lines       16392    16396       +4     
==========================================
+ Hits        10358    10359       +1     
- Misses       6034     6037       +3     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@0RAJA 0RAJA merged commit f78808c into main Jan 3, 2025
6 checks passed
@0RAJA 0RAJA deleted the feat_bkbase_storage branch January 3, 2025 08:57
@0RAJA 0RAJA restored the feat_bkbase_storage branch January 3, 2025 08:58
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants