-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat: add tests for binary search trees #1769
Merged
raklaptudirm
merged 1 commit into
TheAlgorithms:master
from
ridge-kimani:feat/binary-search-tree-specs
Jan 15, 2025
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,66 @@ | ||
import { Tree } from '../BinarySearchTree.js' | ||
|
||
describe('Binary Search Tree', () => { | ||
let tree | ||
|
||
beforeEach(() => { | ||
tree = new Tree() | ||
tree.addValue(10) | ||
tree.addValue(5) | ||
tree.addValue(15) | ||
tree.addValue(3) | ||
tree.addValue(8) | ||
}) | ||
|
||
test('should add values to the tree', () => { | ||
tree.addValue(12) | ||
|
||
expect(tree.search(12)).toBe(12) | ||
expect(tree.search(5)).toBe(5) | ||
expect(tree.search(15)).toBe(15) | ||
}) | ||
|
||
test('should perform in-order traversal', () => { | ||
const values = [] | ||
const output = (val) => values.push(val) | ||
tree.traverse(output) | ||
expect(values).toEqual([3, 5, 8, 10, 15]) | ||
}) | ||
|
||
test('should remove leaf nodes correctly', () => { | ||
tree.removeValue(5) | ||
expect(tree.search(5)).toBeNull() | ||
}) | ||
|
||
test('should remove nodes with one child correctly', () => { | ||
tree.addValue(12) | ||
tree.removeValue(15) | ||
|
||
expect(tree.search(15)).toBeNull() | ||
expect(tree.search(12)).toBe(12) | ||
}) | ||
|
||
test('should remove nodes with two children correctly', () => { | ||
tree.addValue(18) | ||
tree.removeValue(15) | ||
|
||
expect(tree.search(15)).toBeNull() | ||
expect(tree.search(18)).toBe(18) | ||
}) | ||
|
||
test('should return null for non-existent values', () => { | ||
expect(tree.search(20)).toBeNull() | ||
expect(tree.search(0)).toBeNull() | ||
}) | ||
|
||
test('should handle removal of root node correctly', () => { | ||
tree.removeValue(10) | ||
expect(tree.search(10)).toBeNull() | ||
}) | ||
|
||
test('should handle empty tree gracefully', () => { | ||
const newTree = new Tree() | ||
newTree.removeValue(22) // Should not throw | ||
expect(newTree.search(22)).toBeNull() | ||
}) | ||
}) |
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Just a shorthand recommendation.
Checking for
if(found) {
will check for not null and not undefined .So no need to explicitly use
if (found !== null) {
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The search return value can only be
null
or aNode
, hence the implicit check.