Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

try launch freebsd tests in gdb and print stack trace #2787

Draft
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

Green-Sky
Copy link
Member

@Green-Sky Green-Sky commented Nov 9, 2024

This change is Reviewable

@Green-Sky Green-Sky force-pushed the ci_freebsd_gdb branch 6 times, most recently from cf814e2 to 9637b47 Compare November 9, 2024 12:18
@Green-Sky
Copy link
Member Author

Looks like this fishing expedition got grounded by a heisenbug.

@iphydf iphydf added this to the v0.2.21 milestone Nov 9, 2024
@Green-Sky Green-Sky force-pushed the ci_freebsd_gdb branch 5 times, most recently from 8aa51a8 to faeb02e Compare November 10, 2024 12:32
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 10, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 72.92%. Comparing base (fa723e3) to head (f592f4e).
Report is 6 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #2787      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   72.96%   72.92%   -0.05%     
==========================================
  Files         149      149              
  Lines       30566    30570       +4     
==========================================
- Hits        22303    22293      -10     
- Misses       8263     8277      +14     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@Green-Sky
Copy link
Member Author

Green-Sky commented Nov 10, 2024

Idea tried

👎 It is not an issue with SO_REUSEADDR.

How

Use only unique ports (every test in TCP auto test got its own set of 3 ports).
f592f4e

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants