-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 46
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
restore inbox-current-tags-alist
from inbox buffer to WIP clarifying buffer
#151
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
…g buffer Signed-off-by: Tiou Lims <[email protected]>
Hi @douo , thank you for looking into this! Part of the intent with the upgrade to v3 is to stop depending as much on the hardcoded values in those files -- your tags are yours, and they are not required to make org-gtd work (the only exception is this default value for the organize-hooks, and maybe that's a bad default value). The reason this decision was made is because I thought that your tags would always be your own, and therefore that you would just want to use org-mode to set the tags with If I made the wrong decision, and you have tags which you don't want to see in org-gtd, then we should create a customizable variable Eventually, while I would love to see folks who use org-gtd for years because it works very well for them, I also want to make it possible / seamless for people to move away from org-gtd to their own system, if they discover they have different needs. So: is it possible for you to start using |
Hi @Trevoke, ...
;; Version: 9.6.6
....
defvar-local org-current-tag-alist nil
"Alist of all tag groups in current buffer.
This variable takes into consideration `org-tag-alist',
`org-tag-persistent-alist' and TAGS keywords in the buffer.") I completely concur that this PR appears to be somewhat hardcoded. The primary issue at hand is that the tags defined in the
|
Hi @douo , sorry, let me write fewer words. Org-GTD does not want you to use Org-GTD wants you to use Are you able to move your tags from If not, I have a better solution than this PR. |
Forcing the use of |
Okay.
Then I have to think about it a little bit more. The main problem we're
going to run into is that when we do a one-off clarification, the inbox may
not be the buffer we come from, so you're going to run into more problems.
Obviously we could fix that by always opening the inbox and taking the tags
from that buffer, and maybe that's the simplest answer.
…On Wed, May 17, 2023 at 10:29 AM Tiou Lims ***@***.***> wrote:
Forcing the use of org-tag-alist may not be a good idea, as I use Org not
only for GTD but also for my writing system. These two systems require
different tag sets.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#151 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAAQSSP4AIKEMKTJMGY3VZDXGTOFJANCNFSM6AAAAAAYE2S57Q>
.
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID:
***@***.***>
|
When using
org-gtd-process-inbox
, org-gtd creates a new buffer for each item but does not bring the heading metadata frominbox.org
. This causes org-mode to be unable to find tags from the current buffer. This PR resolved #145 in my situation.