Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
fredrik-bakke
changed the title
|
What is the precise proposal for the use of the word "noncoherent"? Is it for omega-categories without any laws at all? |
It's meant for any sort of (pre-)category without any laws at all. If it has one level of coherence I'm thinking to call it |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR renames "noncoherent wild higher categories" to "noncoherent ω-categories". The latter is both shorter and more descriptive. Additionally, this PR renames "isomorphisms in ω-categories" to "coinductive isomorphisms in ω-categories", as the concept that was defined is strictly weaker than the proper definition of an isomorphism in an ω-category, as discussed with @VojtechStep.
Co-authored-by: VojtechStep [email protected]