Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Relationships between inequality, strict inequality, and their negations on reals #1288

Merged
merged 29 commits into from
Feb 8, 2025

Conversation

lowasser
Copy link
Contributor

@lowasser lowasser commented Feb 7, 2025

I haven't yet bothered with the theorems that require LEM -- or at least truncated LEM, which I don't yet understand the equivalence of with LEM -- but these results are tractable.

@EgbertRijke
Copy link
Collaborator

If P is a proposition, then is-decidable (type-Prop P) is already a proposition, as was shown here:

is-decidable-Prop

So, propositionally truncating it results simply in an equivalent proposition. I suspect that you needed proposition in a place where you would have liked to use is-decidable (type-Prop P), and thought that the solution must have been to propositionally truncate it. Luckily, however, you have is-decidable-Prop P at your disposal.

Copy link
Collaborator

@fredrik-bakke fredrik-bakke left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice additions! I only have some stylistic changes I'd like you to implement before this is merged.

@lowasser
Copy link
Contributor Author

lowasser commented Feb 8, 2025

I think we're done? I do prefer "less than" and "less than or equal to" to "strictly less than" and "less than."

@fredrik-bakke fredrik-bakke merged commit 98de2ef into UniMath:master Feb 8, 2025
4 checks passed
@lowasser lowasser deleted the ineq-strict-ineq-real branch February 8, 2025 23:09
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants