Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(icon): fix missing icon type (VIV-2303) #2119

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Feb 4, 2025

Conversation

RichardHelm
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 4, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 100.00%. Comparing base (d61b119) to head (2c7b981).
Report is 1265 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##              main     #2119     +/-   ##
===========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%             
===========================================
  Files          123       377    +254     
  Lines         1562      9451   +7889     
  Branches       108      1529   +1421     
===========================================
+ Hits          1562      9451   +7889     
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 100.00% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@RichardHelm RichardHelm changed the title fix(icon): fix missing icon type (VIV-000) fix(icon): fix missing icon type (VIV-2303) Feb 4, 2025
@RichardHelm RichardHelm enabled auto-merge (squash) February 4, 2025 16:08
@RichardHelm RichardHelm merged commit f54a197 into main Feb 4, 2025
15 checks passed
@RichardHelm RichardHelm deleted the VIV-000-fix-option-type branch February 4, 2025 16:15
@github-actions github-actions bot mentioned this pull request Feb 4, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants