Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Don't consider function for ASAN #1932

Closed

Conversation

MarkusTeufelberger
Copy link
Collaborator

ge25519_scalarmult_base_choose_niels leads to errors (#1668) when compiled with address sanitizer.

Solution from http://stackoverflow.com/a/27982389

Original bug: #1668

ge25519_scalarmult_base_choose_niels leads to errors (XRPLF#1668) when compiled with address sanitizer.
@codecov-io
Copy link

codecov-io commented Dec 10, 2016

Current coverage is 65.46% (diff: 100%)

Merging #1932 into develop will increase coverage by <.01%

@@            develop      #1932   diff @@
==========================================
  Files           698        698          
  Lines         49745      49745          
  Methods           0          0          
  Messages          0          0          
  Branches          0          0          
==========================================
+ Hits          32562      32564     +2   
+ Misses        17183      17181     -2   
  Partials          0          0          

Powered by Codecov. Last update 4d7b1a3...7aefd61

@nbougalis
Copy link
Contributor

I'm not sure if we really want to modify the donna sources. Maybe this should be submitted to upstream?

@MarkusTeufelberger
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Last commit is from nearly 2 years ago and they also didn't merge floodyberry/ed25519-donna#21 yet which is from 2014. I can try submitting there, but the project seems a bit stale (or mature/finished, depending on PoV).

@nbougalis
Copy link
Contributor

I'll mark this as passed, because it's good to be able to run ASAN builds without false positives.

@nbougalis nbougalis added the Ready to merge *PR author* thinks it's ready to merge. Has passed code review. Perf sign-off may still be required. label Jan 1, 2017
@nbougalis
Copy link
Contributor

nbougalis commented Jan 14, 2017

Merged as a550072. Thank you for the contribution Markus.

@nbougalis nbougalis closed this Jan 14, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Ready to merge *PR author* thinks it's ready to merge. Has passed code review. Perf sign-off may still be required.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants