Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Implement eth_feeHistory and eth_maxPriorityFeePerGas APIs #2221

Open
wants to merge 33 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

saeed-zil
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@saeed-zil saeed-zil linked an issue Jan 23, 2025 that may be closed by this pull request
@saeed-zil saeed-zil self-assigned this Jan 23, 2025
@saeed-zil saeed-zil marked this pull request as draft January 23, 2025 20:52
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jan 23, 2025

🐰 Bencher Report

Branch1512-implement-eth_feehistory-to-support-type-2-transactions
Testbedself-hosted
Click to view all benchmark results
BenchmarkLatencyBenchmark Result
milliseconds (ms)
(Result Δ%)
Upper Boundary
milliseconds (ms)
(Limit %)
full-blocks-erc20-transfers/full-blocks-erc20-transfers📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
1,083.00 ms
(+0.09%)Baseline: 1,081.98 ms
1,425.18 ms
(75.99%)
full-blocks-evm-transfers/full-blocks-evm-transfers📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
446.55 ms
(+10.11%)Baseline: 405.57 ms
489.72 ms
(91.18%)
full-blocks-zil-transfers/full-blocks-zil-transfers📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
5,629.20 ms
(+37.03%)Baseline: 4,107.88 ms
5,757.35 ms
(97.77%)
process-empty/process-empty📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
10.38 ms
(+3.99%)Baseline: 9.99 ms
10.72 ms
(96.87%)
🐰 View full continuous benchmarking report in Bencher

@saeed-zil saeed-zil marked this pull request as ready for review January 24, 2025 09:35
…ment-eth_feehistory-to-support-type-2-transactions
@JamesHinshelwood JamesHinshelwood changed the title feat: implement eth_feeHistory API method. Implement eth_feeHistory and eth_maxPriorityFeePerGas APIs Feb 11, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@JamesHinshelwood JamesHinshelwood left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

A couple more comments, sorry. Also the tests are failing.

@saeed-zil
Copy link
Contributor Author

I discovered #2441 while examining the only breaking test. Therefore, I need to resolve it before merging this code.

@saeed-zil
Copy link
Contributor Author

@JamesHinshelwood, I removed the breaking test from this PR to allow for its merging. It will be re-added in #2441.

@saeed-zil saeed-zil linked an issue Mar 6, 2025 that may be closed by this pull request
@saeed-zil saeed-zil enabled auto-merge March 6, 2025 09:35
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Docs don't mention eth_feeHistory Implement eth_feeHistory to support type-2 transactions
3 participants