Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add ($) cashtag digit categories. $99, $999, $9999 #786

Open
wants to merge 8 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

lukewrightmain
Copy link

This pull request was submitted by a community effort.

As normalization approaches, these current ($) cashtag categories have proved to be a community must.

All digit categories from $99, $999, and $9999 have been fully minted for nearly one month.

Thanks to ENS vision, Raffy.eth, and the current cashtag community for this possibility!

@smartwalkie
Copy link

Hi @lukewrightmain , we have merged this request at this alternate Github. https://github.com/smartwalkie/ensdom-collections.

If you have further changes, please comment there. Results can be seen here: https://sales.ensdom.com/S999-club?club=S999-club&period=7

@lcfr-eth
Copy link

This pull request was submitted by a community effort.

As normalization approaches, these current ($) cashtag categories have proved to be a community must.

All digit categories from $99, $999, and $9999 have been fully minted for nearly one month.

Thanks to ENS vision, Raffy.eth, and the current cashtag community for this possibility!

You submissions will be merged soon Luke. We have been rewriting our backend to deal with all the categories we will be pushing soon.

The earlier comment @smartwalkie is because he and others are cloning our category repo for their own for-profit businesses in an attempt to undermine our repo vs contributing to it in any meaningful way.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants