Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add structured configuration printing #822

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 25, 2025

Conversation

stephenswat
Copy link
Member

The current configuration printing code is a hodgepodge of unstructured printing which facilitates reading by neither humans nor machines. This commit replaces the existing output system by a much more structured, JSON-like format which pretty prints the output and will, in the future, allow us to very easily output configurations in machine-readable formats.

@stephenswat stephenswat added the improvement Improve an existing feature label Jan 23, 2025
@stephenswat stephenswat force-pushed the feat/structured_config branch 2 times, most recently from e1ffd84 to 834d3f7 Compare January 23, 2025 15:01
Copy link
Contributor

@beomki-yeo beomki-yeo left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me

@stephenswat stephenswat force-pushed the feat/structured_config branch from 834d3f7 to 528bbf7 Compare January 25, 2025 11:40
The current configuration printing code is a hodgepodge of unstructured
printing which facilitates reading by neither humans nor machines. This
commit replaces the existing output system by a much more structured,
JSON-like format which pretty prints the output and will, in the future,
allow us to very easily output configurations in machine-readable
formats.
@stephenswat stephenswat merged commit 81e8eed into acts-project:main Jan 25, 2025
29 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
improvement Improve an existing feature
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants