Skip to content

Dompdf vulnerable to URI validation failure on SVG parsing

Critical severity GitHub Reviewed Published Jan 31, 2023 in dompdf/dompdf • Updated Mar 15, 2023

Package

composer dompdf/dompdf (Composer)

Affected versions

< 2.0.2

Patched versions

2.0.2

Description

Summary

The URI validation on dompdf 2.0.1 can be bypassed on SVG parsing by passing <image> tags with uppercase letters. This might leads to arbitrary object unserialize on PHP < 8, through the phar URL wrapper.

Details

The bug occurs during SVG parsing of <image> tags, in src/Image/Cache.php :

if ($type === "svg") {
    $parser = xml_parser_create("utf-8");
    xml_parser_set_option($parser, XML_OPTION_CASE_FOLDING, false);
    xml_set_element_handler(
        $parser,
        function ($parser, $name, $attributes) use ($options, $parsed_url, $full_url) {
            if ($name === "image") {
                $attributes = array_change_key_case($attributes, CASE_LOWER);

This part will try to detect <image> tags in SVG, and will take the href to validate it against the protocolAllowed whitelist. However, the `$name comparison with "image" is case sensitive, which means that such a tag in the SVG will pass :

<svg>
    <Image xlink:href="phar:///foo"></Image>
</svg>

As the tag is named "Image" and not "image", it will not pass the condition to trigger the check.

A correct solution would be to strtolower the $name before the check :

if (strtolower($name) === "image") {

PoC

Parsing the following SVG file is sufficient to reproduce the vulnerability :

<svg>
    <Image xlink:href="phar:///foo"></Image>
</svg>

Impact

An attacker might be able to exploit the vulnerability to call arbitrary URL with arbitrary protocols, if they can provide a SVG file to dompdf. In PHP versions before 8.0.0, it leads to arbitrary unserialize, that will leads at the very least to an arbitrary file deletion, and might leads to remote code execution, depending on classes that are available.

References

@bsweeney bsweeney published to dompdf/dompdf Jan 31, 2023
Published by the National Vulnerability Database Feb 1, 2023
Published to the GitHub Advisory Database Feb 1, 2023
Reviewed Feb 1, 2023
Last updated Mar 15, 2023

Severity

Critical

CVSS overall score

This score calculates overall vulnerability severity from 0 to 10 and is based on the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS).
/ 10

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
Low
Availability
High

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector: More severe the more the remote (logically and physically) an attacker can be in order to exploit the vulnerability.
Attack complexity: More severe for the least complex attacks.
Privileges required: More severe if no privileges are required.
User interaction: More severe when no user interaction is required.
Scope: More severe when a scope change occurs, e.g. one vulnerable component impacts resources in components beyond its security scope.
Confidentiality: More severe when loss of data confidentiality is highest, measuring the level of data access available to an unauthorized user.
Integrity: More severe when loss of data integrity is the highest, measuring the consequence of data modification possible by an unauthorized user.
Availability: More severe when the loss of impacted component availability is highest.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:H

EPSS score

2.569%
(91st percentile)

CVE ID

CVE-2023-23924

GHSA ID

GHSA-3cw5-7cxw-v5qg

Source code

Credits

Loading Checking history
See something to contribute? Suggest improvements for this vulnerability.