Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
proc.c: proc without block
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
* proc.c (proc_new): promoted lambda/proc/Proc.new with no block
  in a method called with a block to a warning/error.

git-svn-id: svn+ssh://ci.ruby-lang.org/ruby/trunk@66772 b2dd03c8-39d4-4d8f-98ff-823fe69b080e
  • Loading branch information
nobu committed Jan 10, 2019
1 parent ec336fb commit 9f1fb0a
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Showing 10 changed files with 144 additions and 66 deletions.
5 changes: 5 additions & 0 deletions NEWS
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -17,6 +17,11 @@ sufficient information, see the ChangeLog file or Redmine
* Method reference operator, <code>.:</code> is introduced as an
experimental feature. [Feature #12125] [Feature #13581]

* Proc.new and proc with no block in a method called with a block is warned
now.

* lambda with no block in a method called with a block errs.

=== Core classes updates (outstanding ones only)

=== Stdlib updates (outstanding ones only)
Expand Down
3 changes: 1 addition & 2 deletions lib/matrix.rb
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -514,12 +514,11 @@ def freeze
# # => prints the numbers 1 to 4
# Matrix[ [1,2], [3,4] ].each(:strict_lower).to_a # => [3]
#
def each(which = :all) # :yield: e
def each(which = :all, &block) # :yield: e
return to_enum :each, which unless block_given?
last = column_count - 1
case which
when :all
block = Proc.new
@rows.each do |row|
row.each(&block)
end
Expand Down
6 changes: 3 additions & 3 deletions lib/prime.rb
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -283,9 +283,9 @@ def each
end

# see +Enumerator+#with_index.
def with_index(offset = 0)
return enum_for(:with_index, offset) { Float::INFINITY } unless block_given?
return each_with_index(&proc) if offset == 0
def with_index(offset = 0, &block)
return enum_for(:with_index, offset) { Float::INFINITY } unless block
return each_with_index(&block) if offset == 0

each do |prime|
yield prime, offset
Expand Down
3 changes: 3 additions & 0 deletions proc.c
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -707,6 +707,9 @@ proc_new(VALUE klass, int8_t is_lambda)

if ((block_handler = rb_vm_frame_block_handler(cfp)) != VM_BLOCK_HANDLER_NONE) {
if (is_lambda) {
rb_raise(rb_eArgError, proc_without_block);
}
else {
rb_warn(proc_without_block);
}
}
Expand Down
24 changes: 19 additions & 5 deletions spec/ruby/core/kernel/proc_spec.rb
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -36,14 +36,28 @@ def test
end

describe "Kernel#proc" do
it "uses the implicit block from an enclosing method" do
def some_method
proc
ruby_version_is ""..."2.7" do
it "uses the implicit block from an enclosing method" do
def some_method
proc
end

prc = some_method { "hello" }

prc.call.should == "hello"
end
end

prc = some_method { "hello" }
ruby_version_is "2.7" do
it "can be created when called with no block" do
def some_method
proc
end

prc.call.should == "hello"
-> {
some_method { "hello" }
}.should complain(/tried to create Proc object without a block/)
end
end

it "needs to be reviewed for spec completeness"
Expand Down
45 changes: 31 additions & 14 deletions spec/ruby/core/proc/block_pass_spec.rb
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -20,22 +20,39 @@ def revivify(&b)
end
end

describe "Proc as an implicit block pass argument" do
def revivify
Proc.new
end
ruby_version_is ""..."2.7" do
describe "Proc as an implicit block pass argument" do
def revivify
Proc.new
end

it "remains the same object if re-vivified by the target method" do
p = Proc.new {}
p2 = revivify(&p)
p.should equal p2
p.should == p2
it "remains the same object if re-vivified by the target method" do
p = Proc.new {}
p2 = revivify(&p)
p.should equal p2
p.should == p2
end

it "remains the same object if reconstructed with Proc.new" do
p = Proc.new {}
p2 = Proc.new(&p)
p.should equal p2
p.should == p2
end
end
end

it "remains the same object if reconstructed with Proc.new" do
p = Proc.new {}
p2 = Proc.new(&p)
p.should equal p2
p.should == p2
ruby_version_is "2.7" do
describe "Proc called with no block" do
def revivify
Proc.new
end

it "raises ArgumentError when called with no block" do
p = Proc.new {}
-> {
revivify(&p)
}.should
end
end
end
53 changes: 39 additions & 14 deletions spec/ruby/core/proc/new_spec.rb
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -95,16 +95,18 @@ def some_method
obj.second.should == 2
end

it "returns a new Proc instance from the block passed to the containing method" do
prc = ProcSpecs.new_proc_in_method { "hello" }
prc.should be_an_instance_of(Proc)
prc.call.should == "hello"
end
ruby_version_is ""..."2.7" do
it "returns a new Proc instance from the block passed to the containing method" do
prc = ProcSpecs.new_proc_in_method { "hello" }
prc.should be_an_instance_of(Proc)
prc.call.should == "hello"
end

it "returns a new Proc instance from the block passed to the containing method" do
prc = ProcSpecs.new_proc_subclass_in_method { "hello" }
prc.should be_an_instance_of(ProcSpecs::ProcSubclass)
prc.call.should == "hello"
it "returns a new Proc instance from the block passed to the containing method" do
prc = ProcSpecs.new_proc_subclass_in_method { "hello" }
prc.should be_an_instance_of(ProcSpecs::ProcSubclass)
prc.call.should == "hello"
end
end
end

Expand Down Expand Up @@ -178,13 +180,36 @@ def some_method
lambda { ProcSpecs.new_proc_subclass_in_method }.should raise_error(ArgumentError)
end

it "uses the implicit block from an enclosing method" do
def some_method
Proc.new
ruby_version_is ""..."2.7" do
it "uses the implicit block from an enclosing method" do
def some_method
Proc.new
end

prc = some_method { "hello" }

prc.call.should == "hello"
end
end

ruby_version_is "2.7" do
it "can be created if invoked from within a method with a block" do
lambda { ProcSpecs.new_proc_in_method { "hello" } }.should complain(/tried to create Proc object without a block/)
end

it "can be created if invoked on a subclass from within a method with a block" do
lambda { ProcSpecs.new_proc_subclass_in_method { "hello" } }.should complain(/tried to create Proc object without a block/)
end

prc = some_method { "hello" }

prc.call.should == "hello"
it "can be create when called with no block" do
def some_method
Proc.new
end

-> {
some_method { "hello" }
}.should complain(/tried to create Proc object without a block/)
end
end
end
27 changes: 19 additions & 8 deletions spec/ruby/language/lambda_spec.rb
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -310,14 +310,25 @@ def obj.define
def meth; lambda; end
end

it "can be created" do
implicit_lambda = nil
-> {
implicit_lambda = meth { 1 }
}.should complain(/tried to create Proc object without a block/)

implicit_lambda.lambda?.should be_true
implicit_lambda.call.should == 1
ruby_version_is ""..."2.7" do
it "can be created" do
implicit_lambda = nil
-> {
implicit_lambda = meth { 1 }
}.should complain(/tried to create Proc object without a block/)

implicit_lambda.lambda?.should be_true
implicit_lambda.call.should == 1
end
end

ruby_version_is "2.7" do
it "raises ArgumentError" do
implicit_lambda = nil
-> {
meth { 1 }
}.should raise_error(ArgumentError, /tried to create Proc object without a block/)
end
end
end

Expand Down
40 changes: 22 additions & 18 deletions spec/ruby/optional/capi/proc_spec.rb
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -69,16 +69,18 @@
# For example: C -> Ruby <- C -> Ruby means a C function called into Ruby
# code which returned to C, then C called into Ruby code again.

# Ruby -> C -> rb_funcall(Proc.new)
it "returns the Proc passed by the Ruby code calling the C function" do
prc = @p.rb_Proc_new(0) { :called }
prc.call.should == :called
end
ruby_version_is ""..."2.7" do
# Ruby -> C -> rb_funcall(Proc.new)
it "returns the Proc passed by the Ruby code calling the C function" do
prc = @p.rb_Proc_new(0) { :called }
prc.call.should == :called
end

# Ruby -> C -> Ruby <- C -> rb_funcall(Proc.new)
it "returns the Proc passed to the Ruby method when the C function calls other Ruby methods before calling Proc.new" do
prc = @p.rb_Proc_new(1) { :called }
prc.call.should == :called
# Ruby -> C -> Ruby <- C -> rb_funcall(Proc.new)
it "returns the Proc passed to the Ruby method when the C function calls other Ruby methods before calling Proc.new" do
prc = @p.rb_Proc_new(1) { :called }
prc.call.should == :called
end
end

# Ruby -> C -> Ruby -> Proc.new
Expand All @@ -93,16 +95,18 @@ def @p.redispatch() rb_Proc_new(0) end
lambda { @p.rb_Proc_new(3) { :called } }.should raise_error(ArgumentError)
end

# Ruby -> C -> Ruby -> C (with new block) -> rb_funcall(Proc.new)
it "returns the most recent Proc passed when the Ruby method called the C function" do
prc = @p.rb_Proc_new(4) { :called }
prc.call.should == :calling_with_block
end
ruby_version_is ""..."2.7" do
# Ruby -> C -> Ruby -> C (with new block) -> rb_funcall(Proc.new)
it "returns the most recent Proc passed when the Ruby method called the C function" do
prc = @p.rb_Proc_new(4) { :called }
prc.call.should == :calling_with_block
end

# Ruby -> C -> Ruby -> C (with new block) <- Ruby <- C -> # rb_funcall(Proc.new)
it "returns the Proc passed from the original Ruby call to the C function" do
prc = @p.rb_Proc_new(5) { :called }
prc.call.should == :called
# Ruby -> C -> Ruby -> C (with new block) <- Ruby <- C -> # rb_funcall(Proc.new)
it "returns the Proc passed from the original Ruby call to the C function" do
prc = @p.rb_Proc_new(5) { :called }
prc.call.should == :called
end
end

# Ruby -> C -> Ruby -> block_given?
Expand Down
4 changes: 2 additions & 2 deletions test/ruby/test_proc.rb
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -424,14 +424,14 @@ def o.foo
1.times { b = lambda }
b
end
assert_equal(:foo, o.foo { :foo }.call)
assert_raise(ArgumentError) {o.foo { :foo }.call}

def o.foo(&b)
b = nil
1.times { b = lambda }
b
end
assert_equal(:foo, o.foo { :foo }.call)
assert_raise(ArgumentError) {o.foo { :foo }.call}
end

def test_arity2
Expand Down

0 comments on commit 9f1fb0a

Please sign in to comment.