Update random snow

[ternaus]

Summary by Sourcery

Replace deprecated snow_point_lower and snow_point_upper parameters with snow_point_range in RandomSnow transform.

Enhancements:

• Simplified the RandomSnow transform initialization by removing deprecated parameters.

Tests:

• Removed tests for deprecated snow_point_lower and snow_point_upper parameters.

[sourcery-ai]

Reviewer's Guide by Sourcery

This pull request refactors the RandomSnow augmentation to use snow_point_range instead of snow_point_lower and snow_point_upper.

Class diagram showing changes to InitSchema class

classDiagram
    class InitSchema {
        +tuple[float, float] snow_point_range
        +float brightness_coeff
        +str method
        -validate_ranges()
    }
    note for InitSchema "Removed snow_point_lower and snow_point_upper fields
Simplified to use snow_point_range tuple"

Loading

State diagram showing RandomSnow parameter validation flow

stateDiagram-v2
    [*] --> ValidateInput
    ValidateInput --> CheckSnowPointRange
    CheckSnowPointRange --> ValidRange: 0 < range[0] <= range[1] < 1
    CheckSnowPointRange --> Error: Invalid range
    ValidRange --> [*]
    Error --> [*]

Loading

File-Level Changes

Change	Details	Files
Replaced snow_point_lower and snow_point_upper with snow_point_range	Removed snow_point_lower and snow_point_upper parameters from RandomSnow.__init__ Removed validation and deprecation warnings related to snow_point_lower and snow_point_upper from InitSchema Removed tests related to snow_point_lower and snow_point_upper from test_random_snow_initialization	albumentations/augmentations/transforms.py tests/test_transforms.py

---

Tips and commands

Interacting with Sourcery

• Trigger a new review: Comment @sourcery-ai review on the pull request.
• Continue discussions: Reply directly to Sourcery's review comments.
• Generate a GitHub issue from a review comment: Ask Sourcery to create an
  issue from a review comment by replying to it.
• Generate a pull request title: Write @sourcery-ai anywhere in the pull
  request title to generate a title at any time.
• Generate a pull request summary: Write @sourcery-ai summary anywhere in
  the pull request body to generate a PR summary at any time. You can also use
  this command to specify where the summary should be inserted.

Customizing Your Experience

Access your dashboard to:

• Enable or disable review features such as the Sourcery-generated pull request
  summary, the reviewer's guide, and others.
• Change the review language.
• Add, remove or edit custom review instructions.
• Adjust other review settings.

Getting Help

• Contact our support team for questions or feedback.
• Visit our documentation for detailed guides and information.
• Keep in touch with the Sourcery team by following us on X/Twitter, LinkedIn or GitHub.

[sourcery-ai]

Hey @ternaus - I've reviewed your changes and they look great!

Here's what I looked at during the review

• 🟡 General issues: 1 issue found
• 🟢 Security: all looks good
• 🟡 Testing: 1 issue found
• 🟢 Complexity: all looks good
• 🟢 Documentation: all looks good

---

Sourcery is free for open source - if you like our reviews please consider sharing them ✨

• X
• Mastodon
• LinkedIn
• Facebook

_{Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.}

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 89.89%. Comparing base (b1a79c2) to head (d48050a).
Report is 363 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##           main    #2257       +/-   ##
=========================================
+ Coverage      0   89.89%   +89.89%     
=========================================
  Files         0       50       +50     
  Lines         0     8946     +8946     
=========================================
+ Hits          0     8042     +8042     
- Misses        0      904      +904     

Flag	Coverage Δ
ubuntu-py3.12	89.89% <ø> (?)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.