ISSUE#12905 - Introduced protections against deserialization attacks (#2) #12906
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Hi, my name is Zach and I'm a developer for Pixee. I wanted to bring some light to this change as it was generated from our automated code security bot.
This change hardens Java deserialization operations against attack. Even a simple operation like an object deserialization is an opportunity to yield control of your system to an attacker. In fact, without specific, non-default protections, any object deserialization call can lead to arbitrary code execution. The JavaDoc now even says:
Let's discuss the attack. In Java, types can customize how they should be deserialized by specifying a
readObject()
method like this real example from an old version of Spring:Reflecting on this code reveals a terrifying conclusion. If an attacker presents this object to be deserialized by your app, the runtime will take a class and a method name from the attacker and then call them. Note that an attacker can provide any serliazed type -- it doesn't have to be the one you're expecting, and it will still deserialize.
Attackers can repurpose the logic of selected types within the Java classpath (called "gadgets") and chain them together to achieve arbitrary remote code execution. There are a limited number of publicly known gadgets that can be used for attack, and our change simply inserts an ObjectInputFilter into the
ObjectInputStream
to prevent them from being used.This is a tough vulnerability class to understand, but it is deadly serious. It offers the highest impact possible (remote code execution), it's a common vulnerability (it's in the OWASP Top 10), and exploitation is easy enough that automated exploitation is possible. It's best to remove deserialization entirely, but our protections is effective against all known exploitation strategies.
More reading
I have additional improvements ready for this repo! If you want to see them, leave the comment: (after installing for your repo here)
... and I will open a new PR right away!
🧚🤖 Powered by Pixeebot
Feedback | Community | Docs | Codemod ID: pixee:java/harden-java-deserialization
Follow this checklist to help us incorporate your contribution quickly and easily:
[ISSUE #123] Fix UnknownException when host config not exist
. Each commit in the pull request should have a meaningful subject line and body.mvn -B clean package apache-rat:check findbugs:findbugs -Dmaven.test.skip=true
to make sure basic checks pass. Runmvn clean install -DskipITs
to make sure unit-test pass. Runmvn clean test-compile failsafe:integration-test
to make sure integration-test pass.