Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
AAP-33915: Use the new exception handler for the Chat view #1478
AAP-33915: Use the new exception handler for the Chat view #1478
Changes from all commits
1fd4d3b
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is a breaking change.
AACSAPIView
usesSchema1Event.exception: bool
to indicate whether an exception occurred.Schema1Event.problem
contains the exception message. Is this going to cause Marty etc issues?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think so, well at least if he's using this field as for reports in Amplitude. Although this looks not a blocker, we just need to let him know in order to "refactor", if necessary, any query.
Also @manstis this is a good candidate to make the integration tests to fail :) I think we're doing assertions over this field, it worth checking too, IMO :)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
note: I knew the way we use this field is not always consistent depending on the view and I would like to converge to the new approach.
Feel free to object/cry/shout :-).
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@romartin I could only find these tests. This seems to only be a basic sanity check. Do you know of any others?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
oh @manstis , correct! Sorry for the confusion.