Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Improvement] Support filter by status and type when show table optimizing process #3230

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Sep 29, 2024

Conversation

baiyangtx
Copy link
Contributor

Why are the changes needed?

To support filter of optimizing type and status when show table optimizing process list.

Brief change log

  • Add filter selection in WebUI
  • Add filter status in TableDescriptorAPI
  • Implement the filter in Mixed/Iceberg/Paimon/Hudi descriptor
  • Add RESTAPI to get table process type for different format.

How was this patch tested?

  • Add some test cases that check the changes thoroughly including negative and positive cases if possible

  • Add screenshots for manual tests if appropriate

  • Run test locally before making a pull request

Documentation

  • Does this pull request introduce a new feature? (no)

…zing process

(cherry picked from commit 80ad146b9007115a40b1ab6c4dee9c492b02d71c)
@github-actions github-actions bot added module:ams-server Ams server module module:ams-dashboard Ams dashboard module module:common labels Sep 27, 2024
@baiyangtx
Copy link
Contributor Author

It looks like this.

image

And fetch process-type from backend

image

Copy link
Member

@zhangmo8 zhangmo8 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@baiyangtx baiyangtx merged commit 967eea2 into apache:master Sep 29, 2024
4 checks passed
@baiyangtx baiyangtx deleted the query-optimizing-status branch September 29, 2024 11:36
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants