test(13525): demonstrate extension node invariants catching improper …

…mutation during an optimizer pass

datafusion/core/tests/user_defined/user_defined_plan.rs

@@ -346,6 +346,62 @@ async fn topk_invariants() -> Result<()> {
     Ok(())
 }
 
+#[tokio::test]
+async fn topk_invariants_after_invalid_mutation() -> Result<()> {
+    // CONTROL
+    // Build a valid topK plan.
+    let config = SessionConfig::new().with_target_partitions(48);
+    let runtime = Arc::new(RuntimeEnv::default());
+    let state = SessionStateBuilder::new()
+        .with_config(config)
+        .with_runtime_env(runtime)
+        .with_default_features()
+        .with_query_planner(Arc::new(TopKQueryPlanner {}))
+        // 1. adds a valid TopKPlanNode
+        .with_optimizer_rule(Arc::new(TopKOptimizerRule {
+            invariant_mock: Some(InvariantMock {
+                should_fail_invariant: false,
+                kind: InvariantLevel::Always,
+            }),
+        }))
+        .with_analyzer_rule(Arc::new(MyAnalyzerRule {}))
+        .build();
+    let ctx = setup_table(SessionContext::new_with_state(state)).await?;
+    run_and_compare_query(ctx, "Topk context").await?;
+
+    // Test
+    // Build a valid topK plan.
+    // Then have an invalid mutation in an optimizer run.
+    let config = SessionConfig::new().with_target_partitions(48);
+    let runtime = Arc::new(RuntimeEnv::default());
+    let state = SessionStateBuilder::new()
+        .with_config(config)
+        .with_runtime_env(runtime)
+        .with_default_features()
+        .with_query_planner(Arc::new(TopKQueryPlanner {}))
+        // 1. adds a valid TopKPlanNode
+        .with_optimizer_rule(Arc::new(TopKOptimizerRule {
+            invariant_mock: Some(InvariantMock {
+                should_fail_invariant: false,
+                kind: InvariantLevel::Always,
+            }),
+        }))
+        // 2. break the TopKPlanNode
+        .with_optimizer_rule(Arc::new(OptimizerMakeExtensionNodeInvalid {}))
+        .with_analyzer_rule(Arc::new(MyAnalyzerRule {}))
+        .build();
+    let ctx = setup_table(SessionContext::new_with_state(state)).await?;
+    matches!(
+        &*run_and_compare_query(ctx, "Topk context")
+            .await
+            .unwrap_err()
+            .message(),
+        "node fails check, such as improper inputs"
+    );
+
+    Ok(())
+}
+
 fn make_topk_context() -> SessionContext {
     make_topk_context_with_invariants(None)
 }
@@ -366,6 +422,49 @@ fn make_topk_context_with_invariants(
     SessionContext::new_with_state(state)
 }
 
+#[derive(Debug)]
+struct OptimizerMakeExtensionNodeInvalid;
+
+impl OptimizerRule for OptimizerMakeExtensionNodeInvalid {
+    fn name(&self) -> &str {
+        "OptimizerMakeExtensionNodeInvalid"
+    }
+
+    fn apply_order(&self) -> Option<ApplyOrder> {
+        Some(ApplyOrder::TopDown)
+    }
+
+    fn supports_rewrite(&self) -> bool {
+        true
+    }
+
+    // Example rewrite pass which impacts validity of the extension node.
+    fn rewrite(
+        &self,
+        plan: LogicalPlan,
+        _config: &dyn OptimizerConfig,
+    ) -> Result<Transformed<LogicalPlan>, DataFusionError> {
+        if let LogicalPlan::Extension(Extension { node }) = &plan {
+            if let Some(prev) = node.as_any().downcast_ref::<TopKPlanNode>() {
+                return Ok(Transformed::yes(LogicalPlan::Extension(Extension {
+                    node: Arc::new(TopKPlanNode {
+                        k: prev.k,
+                        input: prev.input.clone(),
+                        expr: prev.expr.clone(),
+                        // In a real use case, this rewriter could have change the number of inputs, etc
+                        invariant_mock: Some(InvariantMock {
+                            should_fail_invariant: true,
+                            kind: InvariantLevel::Always,
+                        }),
+                    }),
+                })));
+            }
+        };
+
+        Ok(Transformed::no(plan))
+    }
+}
+
 // ------ The implementation of the TopK code follows -----
 
 #[derive(Debug)]

datafusion/expr/src/logical_plan/invariants.rs

@@ -61,8 +61,8 @@ pub enum InvariantLevel {
     Executable,
 }
 
-/// Apply the [`InvariantLevel::Always`] check at the root plan node only.
-pub fn assert_always_invariants(plan: &LogicalPlan) -> Result<()> {
+/// Apply the [`InvariantLevel::Always`] check at the current plan node only.
+pub fn assert_always_invariants_at_current_node(plan: &LogicalPlan) -> Result<()> {
     // Refer to <https://datafusion.apache.org/contributor-guide/specification/invariants.html#relation-name-tuples-in-logical-fields-and-logical-columns-are-unique>
     assert_unique_field_names(plan)?;
 
@@ -73,7 +73,7 @@ pub fn assert_always_invariants(plan: &LogicalPlan) -> Result<()> {
 /// as well as the less stringent [`InvariantLevel::Always`] checks.
 pub fn assert_executable_invariants(plan: &LogicalPlan) -> Result<()> {
     // Always invariants
-    assert_always_invariants(plan)?;
+    assert_always_invariants_at_current_node(plan)?;
     assert_valid_extension_nodes(plan, InvariantLevel::Always)?;
 
     // Executable invariants

datafusion/expr/src/logical_plan/plan.rs

@@ -25,7 +25,8 @@ use std::sync::{Arc, LazyLock};
 
 use super::dml::CopyTo;
 use super::invariants::{
-    assert_always_invariants, assert_executable_invariants, InvariantLevel,
+    assert_always_invariants_at_current_node, assert_executable_invariants,
+    InvariantLevel,
 };
 use super::DdlStatement;
 use crate::builder::{change_redundant_column, unnest_with_options};
@@ -1137,7 +1138,7 @@ impl LogicalPlan {
     /// checks that the plan conforms to the listed invariant level, returning an Error if not
     pub fn check_invariants(&self, check: InvariantLevel) -> Result<()> {
         match check {
-            InvariantLevel::Always => assert_always_invariants(self),
+            InvariantLevel::Always => assert_always_invariants_at_current_node(self),
             InvariantLevel::Executable => assert_executable_invariants(self),
         }
     }