Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[fix](cloud) retry read_at when corruption using file cache #48786

Open
wants to merge 4 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

freemandealer
Copy link
Contributor

What problem does this PR solve?

Issue Number: close #xxx

Related PR: #xxx

Problem Summary:

Release note

None

Check List (For Author)

  • Test

    • Regression test
    • Unit Test
    • Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)
    • No need to test or manual test. Explain why:
      • This is a refactor/code format and no logic has been changed.
      • Previous test can cover this change.
      • No code files have been changed.
      • Other reason
  • Behavior changed:

    • No.
    • Yes.
  • Does this need documentation?

    • No.
    • Yes.

Check List (For Reviewer who merge this PR)

  • Confirm the release note
  • Confirm test cases
  • Confirm document
  • Add branch pick label

@Thearas
Copy link
Contributor

Thearas commented Mar 6, 2025

Thank you for your contribution to Apache Doris.
Don't know what should be done next? See How to process your PR.

Please clearly describe your PR:

  1. What problem was fixed (it's best to include specific error reporting information). How it was fixed.
  2. Which behaviors were modified. What was the previous behavior, what is it now, why was it modified, and what possible impacts might there be.
  3. What features were added. Why was this function added?
  4. Which code was refactored and why was this part of the code refactored?
  5. Which functions were optimized and what is the difference before and after the optimization?

return file_cache_key_from_path(seg_path).to_string();
}

Status PageIO::read_and_decompress_page_with_file_cache_retry(const PageReadOptions& opts,
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

where is this function is called?

@@ -229,5 +235,50 @@ Status PageIO::read_and_decompress_page_(const PageReadOptions& opts, PageHandle
return Status::OK();
}

io::UInt128Wrapper file_cache_key_from_path(const std::string& seg_path) {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

is it mandatory to introduce file cache to PageIO?

Signed-off-by: zhengyu <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: zhengyu <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: zhengyu <[email protected]>
Slice body;
PageFooterPB footer;
RETURN_IF_ERROR(
PageIO::read_and_decompress_page(opts, &_sk_index_handle, &body, &footer));
RETURN_IF_ERROR(PageIO::read_and_decompress_page_with_file_cache_retry(
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

it's better that we expand read_and_decompress_page_with_file_cache_retry() in segment.cpp
instead of hacking page_io.h/cpp.
the low level IO should not notice "file cache".

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants