Update ac and vuln test names

[kooomix]

Type

Enhancement

---

Description

This PR primarily focuses on refactoring and enhancing the test function names for better readability and consistency. The changes are as follows:

• In 'ks_microservice_test.py' and 'vuln_scan_tests.py', multiple test function names have been renamed.
• A new Python file 'ks_vuln_scan.py' has been added with a class 'ScanImageControls' and its methods.
• The path for vulnerability scanning has been updated in 'statics.py'.
• Import statements in 'tests.py' have been updated to reflect the new file and function names.
• The test function names in the Jenkinsfile 'Jenkinsfile-helm-ks-be.groovy' have been updated.

---

Changes walkthrough

	Relevant files
Refactoring	ks_microservice_test.py Refactor test function names in ks_microservice_test.py                    configurations/system/tests_cases/ks_microservice_test.py Renamed multiple test function names for better readability and consistency. +13/-13  vuln_scan_tests.py Refactor test function names in vuln_scan_tests.py                              configurations/system/tests_cases/vuln_scan_tests.py Renamed multiple test function names and import statements for better readability and consistency. +23/-23  tests.py Update import statements in tests.py                                                          configurations/system/tests.py Updated import statements to reflect the new file and function names. +2/-2
New file	ks_vuln_scan.py Add new Python file 'ks_vuln_scan.py' with 'ScanImageControls' class tests_scripts/helm/ks_vuln_scan.py Added a new Python file 'ks_vuln_scan.py' with a class 'ScanImageControls' and its methods. +81/-1
Configuration changes	statics.py Update vulnerability scanning path in statics.py                                  systest_utils/statics.py Updated the path for vulnerability scanning. +3/-3      Jenkinsfile-helm-ks-be.groovy Update test function names in Jenkinsfile                                                jenkins_files/Jenkinsfile-helm-ks-be.groovy Updated the test function names in the Jenkinsfile. +11/-11

---

✨ Usage guide:

---

Overview:
The describe tool scans the PR code changes, and generates a description for the PR - title, type, summary, walkthrough and labels. The tool can be triggered automatically every time a new PR is opened, or can be invoked manually by commenting on a PR.

When commenting, to edit configurations related to the describe tool (pr_description section), use the following template:

/describe --pr_description.some_config1=... --pr_description.some_config2=...

With a configuration file, use the following template:

[pr_description]
some_config1=...
some_config2=...

Enabling\disabling automation When you first install the app, the default mode for the describe tool is: pr_commands = ["/describe --pr_description.add_original_user_description=true" "--pr_description.keep_original_user_title=true", ...] meaning the describe tool will run automatically on every PR, will keep the original title, and will add the original user description above the generated description. Markers are an alternative way to control the generated description, to give maximal control to the user. If you set: pr_commands = ["/describe --pr_description.use_description_markers=true", ...] the tool will replace every marker of the form pr_agent:marker_name in the PR description with the relevant content, where marker_name is one of the following: type: the PR type. summary: the PR summary. walkthrough: the PR walkthrough. Note that when markers are enabled, if the original PR description does not contain any markers, the tool will not alter the description at all.

Custom labels The default labels of the describe tool are quite generic: [Bug fix, Tests, Enhancement, Documentation, Other]. If you specify custom labels in the repo's labels page or via configuration file, you can get tailored labels for your use cases. Examples for custom labels: Main topic:performance - pr_agent:The main topic of this PR is performance New endpoint - pr_agent:A new endpoint was added in this PR SQL query - pr_agent:A new SQL query was added in this PR Dockerfile changes - pr_agent:The PR contains changes in the Dockerfile ... The list above is eclectic, and aims to give an idea of different possibilities. Define custom labels that are relevant for your repo and use cases. Note that Labels are not mutually exclusive, so you can add multiple label categories. Make sure to provide proper title, and a detailed and well-phrased description for each label, so the tool will know when to suggest it.

Inline File Walkthrough 💎 For enhanced user experience, the describe tool can add file summaries directly to the "Files changed" tab in the PR page. This will enable you to quickly understand the changes in each file, while reviewing the code changes (diffs). To enable inline file summary, set pr_description.inline_file_summary in the configuration file, possible values are: 'table': File changes walkthrough table will be displayed on the top of the "Files changed" tab, in addition to the "Conversation" tab. true: A collapsable file comment with changes title and a changes summary for each file in the PR. false (default): File changes walkthrough will be added only to the "Conversation" tab.

Utilizing extra instructions The describe tool can be configured with extra instructions, to guide the model to a feedback tailored to the needs of your project. Be specific, clear, and concise in the instructions. With extra instructions, you are the prompter. Notice that the general structure of the description is fixed, and cannot be changed. Extra instructions can change the content or style of each sub-section of the PR description. Examples for extra instructions: [pr_description] extra_instructions=""" - The PR title should be in the format: '<PR type>: <title>' - The title should be short and concise (up to 10 words) - ... """ Use triple quotes to write multi-line instructions. Use bullet points to make the instructions more readable.

More PR-Agent commands To invoke the PR-Agent, add a comment using one of the following commands: /review: Request a review of your Pull Request. /describe: Update the PR title and description based on the contents of the PR. /improve [--extended]: Suggest code improvements. Extended mode provides a higher quality feedback. /ask <QUESTION>: Ask a question about the PR. /update_changelog: Update the changelog based on the PR's contents. /add_docs 💎: Generate docstring for new components introduced in the PR. /generate_labels 💎: Generate labels for the PR based on the PR's contents. /analyze 💎: Automatically analyzes the PR, and presents changes walkthrough for each component. See the tools guide for more details. To list the possible configuration parameters, add a /config comment.

See the describe usage page for a comprehensive guide on using this tool.

[codiumai-pr-agent-free]

PR Description updated to latest commit (d183424)

[codiumai-pr-agent-free]

PR Analysis

(review updated until commit d183424)

• 🎯 Main theme: Refactoring test function names and paths for better readability and consistency
• 📝 PR summary: This PR primarily focuses on refactoring and enhancing the test function names for better readability and consistency. It includes renaming multiple test function names and import statements in several Python files, adding a new Python file with a class and its methods, and updating the path for vulnerability scanning in a statics file. The PR also updates the test function names in a Jenkinsfile.
• 📌 Type of PR: Enhancement
• 🧪 Relevant tests added: No
• ⏱️ Estimated effort to review [1-5]: 3, because the PR involves changes in multiple files including Python scripts and Jenkinsfiles. The changes are mostly renaming and refactoring which are straightforward, but require careful attention to ensure consistency across all files.
• 🔒 Security concerns: No security concerns found

PR Feedback

💡 General suggestions: The PR seems to be well-structured and the changes are consistent across all the files. The renaming of the functions and paths enhances the readability and understanding of the code. However, it would be beneficial to ensure that these changes are reflected in any documentation or comments that refer to these function names or paths.

🤖 Code feedback:

---

relevant file	configurations/system/tests_cases/ks_microservice_test.py
suggestion	Consider using a consistent naming convention for all test functions. The new names are more concise which is good, but they could be more descriptive. For example, instead of ac_5_fix_control_with_relevancy, consider test_ac_scenario_5_fix_control_with_relevancy to indicate that it's a test function. [medium]
relevant line	def ac_5_fix_control_with_relevancy():

---

relevant file	configurations/system/tests_cases/vuln_scan_tests.py
suggestion	It's good that you've updated the import statements to reflect the new function names. However, consider organizing your imports according to PEP8, i.e., standard library imports, related third party imports, and local application/library specific imports. [medium]
relevant line	from tests_scripts.helm.vuln_scan import VulnerabilityScanningRegistry

---

relevant file	tests_scripts/helm/ks_vuln_scan.py
suggestion	The new file and class added seems to be well-structured. However, consider adding error handling or assertions to ensure that the backend is not None. [important]
relevant line	assert self.backend != None; f'the test {self.test_driver.test_name} must run with backend'

---

relevant file	systest_utils/statics.py
suggestion	It's good that you've updated the path for vulnerability scanning. However, consider using os.path.join for constructing paths as it's more reliable and works on all operating systems. [medium]
relevant line	DEFAULT_VULNERABILITY_SCANNING_PATHS = os.path.abspath(os.path.join('configurations', 'vuln_scan'))

---

---

✨ Usage guide:

---

Overview:
The review tool scans the PR code changes, and generates a PR review. The tool can be triggered automatically every time a new PR is opened, or can be invoked manually by commenting on any PR.
When commenting, to edit configurations related to the review tool (pr_reviewer section), use the following template:

/review --pr_reviewer.some_config1=... --pr_reviewer.some_config2=...

With a configuration file, use the following template:

[pr_reviewer]
some_config1=...
some_config2=...

Utilizing extra instructions The review tool can be configured with extra instructions, which can be used to guide the model to a feedback tailored to the needs of your project. Be specific, clear, and concise in the instructions. With extra instructions, you are the prompter. Specify the relevant sub-tool, and the relevant aspects of the PR that you want to emphasize. Examples for extra instructions: [pr_reviewer] # /review # extra_instructions=""" In the 'general suggestions' section, emphasize the following: - Does the code logic cover relevant edge cases? - Is the code logic clear and easy to understand? - Is the code logic efficient? ... """ Use triple quotes to write multi-line instructions. Use bullet points to make the instructions more readable.

How to enable\disable automation When you first install PR-Agent app, the default mode for the review tool is: pr_commands = ["/review", ...] meaning the review tool will run automatically on every PR, with the default configuration. Edit this field to enable/disable the tool, or to change the used configurations

Auto-labels The review tool can auto-generate two specific types of labels for a PR: a possible security issue label, that detects possible security issues (enable_review_labels_security flag) a Review effort [1-5]: x label, where x is the estimated effort to review the PR (enable_review_labels_effort flag)

Extra sub-tools The review tool provides a collection of possible feedbacks about a PR. It is recommended to review the possible options, and choose the ones relevant for your use case. Some of the feature that are disabled by default are quite useful, and should be considered for enabling. For example: require_score_review, require_soc2_ticket, and more.

More PR-Agent commands To invoke the PR-Agent, add a comment using one of the following commands: /review: Request a review of your Pull Request. /describe: Update the PR title and description based on the contents of the PR. /improve [--extended]: Suggest code improvements. Extended mode provides a higher quality feedback. /ask <QUESTION>: Ask a question about the PR. /update_changelog: Update the changelog based on the PR's contents. /add_docs 💎: Generate docstring for new components introduced in the PR. /generate_labels 💎: Generate labels for the PR based on the PR's contents. /analyze 💎: Automatically analyzes the PR, and presents changes walkthrough for each component. See the tools guide for more details. To list the possible configuration parameters, add a /config comment.

See the review usage page for a comprehensive guide on using this tool.

[github-actions]

PR Description updated to latest commit (d183424)

[github-actions]

Persistent review updated to latest commit d183424

[github-actions]

PR Code Suggestions

	Suggestions
maintainability	Rename methods to maintain clarity while keeping the names concise.           The method names have been shortened, but they have lost some of their descriptiveness. Consider renaming the methods to maintain clarity while keeping the names concise. configurations/system/tests_cases/ks_microservice_test.py [24] @staticmethod -def ac_5_fix_control_with_relevancy(): +def attack_chain_5_fix_control_with_relevancy(): Revert import statements to use the full module name for clarity.             The import statements have been changed to use a shorter module name, but this could lead to confusion. Consider reverting the import statements to use the full module name for clarity. configurations/system/tests_cases/vuln_scan_tests.py [4] -from tests_scripts.helm.vuln_scan import VulnerabilityScanningRegistry +from tests_scripts.helm.vulnerability_scanning import VulnerabilityScanningRegistry Rename variables to maintain clarity while keeping the names concise.         The variable names have been shortened, but they have lost some of their descriptiveness. Consider renaming the variables to maintain clarity while keeping the names concise. systest_utils/statics.py [61] -DEFAULT_VULNERABILITY_SCANNING_PATHS = os.path.abspath(os.path.join('configurations', 'vuln_scan')) +DEFAULT_VULN_SCAN_PATHS = os.path.abspath(os.path.join('configurations', 'vuln_scan'))
best practice	Rename the class to follow Python's naming convention for classes.            The new class ScanImageControls does not follow Python's naming convention for classes. Consider renaming the class to follow the CapWords convention. tests_scripts/helm/ks_vuln_scan.py [10] -class ScanImageControls(BaseKubescape, BaseHelm): +class ImageControlScanner(BaseKubescape, BaseHelm):

---

✨ Usage guide:

---

Overview:
The improve tool scans the PR code changes, and automatically generates suggestions for improving the PR code. The tool can be triggered automatically every time a new PR is opened, or can be invoked manually by commenting on a PR.
When commenting, to edit configurations related to the improve tool (pr_code_suggestions section), use the following template:

/improve --pr_code_suggestions.some_config1=... --pr_code_suggestions.some_config2=...

With a configuration file, use the following template:

[pr_code_suggestions]
some_config1=...
some_config2=...

Enabling\disabling automation When you first install the app, the default mode for the improve tool is: pr_commands = ["/improve --pr_code_suggestions.summarize=true", ...] meaning the improve tool will run automatically on every PR, with summarization enabled. Delete this line to disable the tool from running automatically.

Utilizing extra instructions Extra instructions are very important for the improve tool, since they enable to guide the model to suggestions that are more relevant to the specific needs of the project. Be specific, clear, and concise in the instructions. With extra instructions, you are the prompter. Specify relevant aspects that you want the model to focus on. Examples for extra instructions: [pr_code_suggestions] # /improve # extra_instructions=""" Emphasize the following aspects: - Does the code logic cover relevant edge cases? - Is the code logic clear and easy to understand? - Is the code logic efficient? ... """ Use triple quotes to write multi-line instructions. Use bullet points to make the instructions more readable.

A note on code suggestions quality While the current AI for code is getting better and better (GPT-4), it's not flawless. Not all the suggestions will be perfect, and a user should not accept all of them automatically. Suggestions are not meant to be simplistic. Instead, they aim to give deep feedback and raise questions, ideas and thoughts to the user, who can then use his judgment, experience, and understanding of the code base. Recommended to use the 'extra_instructions' field to guide the model to suggestions that are more relevant to the specific needs of the project, or use the custom suggestions 💎 tool With large PRs, best quality will be obtained by using 'improve --extended' mode.

More PR-Agent commands To invoke the PR-Agent, add a comment using one of the following commands: /review: Request a review of your Pull Request. /describe: Update the PR title and description based on the contents of the PR. /improve [--extended]: Suggest code improvements. Extended mode provides a higher quality feedback. /ask <QUESTION>: Ask a question about the PR. /update_changelog: Update the changelog based on the PR's contents. /add_docs 💎: Generate docstring for new components introduced in the PR. /generate_labels 💎: Generate labels for the PR based on the PR's contents. /analyze 💎: Automatically analyzes the PR, and presents changes walkthrough for each component. See the tools guide for more details. To list the possible configuration parameters, add a /config comment.

See the improve usage page for a more comprehensive guide on using this tool.