add security risk system test for networkpolicy control

[kooomix]

Type

Tests, Enhancement

---

Description

• Renamed existing test methods to align with a new naming convention.
• Introduced a new test method sr_r_0007_control_networkpolicy to handle security risks with network policy.
• Enhanced the scenario manager to support network policy conditions.
• Removed outdated TODO comments and refactored the ks_microservice script.
• Updated documentation and JSON configurations to reflect the new test methods and scenarios.

---

Changes walkthrough

	Relevant files
Enhancement	security_risks_tests.py Update and Add Security Risk Test Methods                                configurations/system/tests_cases/security_risks_tests.py Renamed test methods to follow a new naming convention. Added a new test method sr_r_0007_control_networkpolicy for testing security risks with network policy. +22/-2    scenarios_manager.py Enhance Scenario Manager with Network Policy Handling        systest_utils/scenarios_manager.py Added handling for with_network_policy in security risks scenarios. +7/-0      ks_microservice.py Clean Up and Refactor ks_microservice Script                          tests_scripts/helm/ks_microservice.py Removed TODO comments and streamlined the code. +0/-3
Configuration changes	attack-chain-5_security-risks-resources_sidebar_R0007.json Add JSON Config for Network Policy Test Scenario                  configurations/scenarios_expected_values/attack-chain-5_security-risks-resources_sidebar_R0007.json Added new JSON configuration for the sr_r_0007_control_networkpolicy test scenario. +53/-0    system_test_mapping.json Update System Test Mapping for New Test Methods                    system_test_mapping.json Updated test mapping to include new and renamed test methods. +16/-2
Documentation	readme.md Update Documentation with New Test Method Names                    readme.md Updated test mapping in the documentation to reflect new and renamed test methods. +3/-2

---

✨ PR-Agent usage:
Comment /help on the PR to get a list of all available PR-Agent tools and their descriptions

[codiumai-pr-agent-free]

PR Description updated to latest commit (33c5f1c)

[github-actions]

Failed to generate code suggestions for PR

[codiumai-pr-agent-free]

PR Review

⏱️ Estimated effort to review [1-5]	3, because the PR involves multiple changes across different files including renaming test methods, adding a new test method, updating scenario management logic, and updating documentation. The changes are moderate in complexity, involving both code and configuration.
🧪 Relevant tests	Yes
🔍 Possible issues	Possible Bug: The with_network_policy flag is added in scenarios_manager.py to handle network policies, but it's unclear if all necessary conditions are checked when this flag is true. This could potentially lead to scenarios where network policies are not appropriately handled.
	Naming Consistency: The renaming of test methods to a new convention (sr_r_0005_control, etc.) should be checked across all documentation and code to ensure consistency.
🔒 Security concerns	No

---

✨ Review tool usage guide:

---

Overview:
The review tool scans the PR code changes, and generates a PR review which includes several types of feedbacks, such as possible PR issues, security threats and relevant test in the PR. More feedbacks can be added by configuring the tool.

The tool can be triggered automatically every time a new PR is opened, or can be invoked manually by commenting on any PR.

• When commenting, to edit configurations related to the review tool (pr_reviewer section), use the following template:

/review --pr_reviewer.some_config1=... --pr_reviewer.some_config2=...

• With a configuration file, use the following template:

[pr_reviewer]
some_config1=...
some_config2=...

See the review usage page for a comprehensive guide on using this tool.

[codiumai-pr-agent-free]

PR Code Suggestions

Category	Suggestions
Bug	Correct the constant used to enable the network policy feature. Replace the incorrect constant HELM_RELEVANCY_FEATURE_ENABLED with HELM_NETWORK_POLICY_FEATURE_ENABLED for the HELM_NETWORK_POLICY_FEATURE key in the helm_kwargs dictionary to correctly enable the network policy feature. configurations/system/tests_cases/security_risks_tests.py [65] -statics.HELM_NETWORK_POLICY_FEATURE: statics.HELM_RELEVANCY_FEATURE_ENABLED, +statics.HELM_NETWORK_POLICY_FEATURE: statics.HELM_NETWORK_POLICY_FEATURE_ENABLED,
Best practice	Ensure method consistency by adding the static method decorator. Add a method decorator @staticmethod to the sr_r_0035_attack_chain method to maintain consistency and ensure that it does not modify class state. configurations/system/tests_cases/security_risks_tests.py [14] +@staticmethod def sr_r_0035_attack_chain():
	Initialize dictionary keys with meaningful default values to prevent errors. Initialize baseFilters["networkPolicyStatus"] with a meaningful default value instead of an empty string to avoid potential type mismatches or errors during processing. systest_utils/scenarios_manager.py [471] -baseFilters["networkPolicyStatus"] = "" +baseFilters["networkPolicyStatus"] = "Not Applied"
Enhancement	Improve method naming for better readability and maintainability. Use a more descriptive method name than sr_r_0035_attack_chain to improve code readability and maintainability. configurations/system/tests_cases/security_risks_tests.py [14] -def sr_r_0035_attack_chain(): +def test_security_risk_attack_chain_scenario_0035():
	Use descriptive default values for dictionary keys to enhance clarity. Replace the empty string assignment to baseFilters["label"] with a more descriptive default value to enhance clarity and usefulness of the filter. systest_utils/scenarios_manager.py [470] -baseFilters["label"] = "" +baseFilters["label"] = "Default Label"

---

✨ Improve tool usage guide:

---

Overview:
The improve tool scans the PR code changes, and automatically generates suggestions for improving the PR code. The tool can be triggered automatically every time a new PR is opened, or can be invoked manually by commenting on a PR.

• When commenting, to edit configurations related to the improve tool (pr_code_suggestions section), use the following template:

/improve --pr_code_suggestions.some_config1=... --pr_code_suggestions.some_config2=...

• With a configuration file, use the following template:

[pr_code_suggestions]
some_config1=...
some_config2=...

See the improve usage page for a comprehensive guide on using this tool.