Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add return statement for workflow GUID in Slack notifications assertion #563

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 7, 2025

Conversation

kooomix
Copy link
Contributor

@kooomix kooomix commented Jan 7, 2025

PR Type

Bug fix, Tests


Description

  • Added a return statement for workflow GUID in validation.

  • Ensured the workflow GUID is accessible after validation.

  • Improved test script functionality for Slack workflows.


Changes walkthrough 📝

Relevant files
Bug fix
slack_workflows.py
Add return statement for workflow GUID                                     

tests_scripts/workflows/slack_workflows.py

  • Added a return statement to return the workflow GUID.
  • Ensured the workflow GUID is returned after successful validation.
  • +3/-1     

    💡 PR-Agent usage: Comment /help "your question" on any pull request to receive relevant information

    Copy link

    PR Reviewer Guide 🔍

    Here are some key observations to aid the review process:

    ⏱️ Estimated effort to review: 1 🔵⚪⚪⚪⚪
    🧪 PR contains tests
    🔒 No security concerns identified
    ⚡ Recommended focus areas for review

    Code Flow

    The found flag is set but never reset between iterations. If multiple workflows are processed, this could lead to incorrect validation results.

    found = True
    break

    Copy link

    PR Code Suggestions ✨

    Explore these optional code suggestions:

    CategorySuggestion                                                                                                                                    Score
    Possible issue
    Fix potential undefined variable reference by moving the return statement inside the loop where the variable is guaranteed to be defined

    Move the return workflow["guid"] statement inside the loop where found is set to
    True, as the workflow variable might be undefined if the loop completes without
    finding a match.

    tests_scripts/workflows/slack_workflows.py [337-342]

     found = True
    +workflow_guid = workflow["guid"]
     break
     
     assert found, f"Workflow with name {expected_name} not found"
    +return workflow_guid
     
    -return workflow["guid"]
    -
    • Apply this suggestion
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 9

    Why: The suggestion correctly identifies a critical issue where 'workflow' could be undefined if no matching workflow is found, which could lead to a runtime error. Moving the GUID extraction inside the loop where 'workflow' is guaranteed to be defined is a crucial fix.

    9

    Copy link

    github-actions bot commented Jan 7, 2025

    Failed to generate code suggestions for PR

    @kooomix kooomix merged commit ce4f538 into master Jan 7, 2025
    2 checks passed
    @kooomix kooomix deleted the mmf branch February 3, 2025 12:26
    Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
    Projects
    None yet
    Development

    Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

    1 participant