Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

BackupService: new option to delete Fuseki backups after copy #1313

Open
wants to merge 6 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

srosset81
Copy link
Contributor

@srosset81 srosset81 commented Sep 27, 2024

New deleteFusekiBackupsAfterCopy setting

@srosset81 srosset81 changed the title BackupService: new option to delete backups after copy BackupService: new option to delete Fuseki backups after copy Sep 27, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@Laurin-W Laurin-W left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good! Looking forward to the stability improvements :)

@@ -147,7 +164,7 @@ const BackupService = {
}
}
},
/** Returns an array of file paths to the backups relative to `this.settings.localServer.fusekiBase`. */
// Returns an array of file paths to the backups relative to `this.settings.localServer.fusekiBase`.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Out of curiosity, why the change from jsdoc to normal comments?

Copy link
Contributor Author

@srosset81 srosset81 Oct 2, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Oh, sorry. I learnt that for, one-line comments, it's better to use // than /* */, as there is less risks of forgetting the closing */, which can break other comments... What advantage is there to have jsdoc comments in that case ?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants