Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add configuration file option for passing parameters to dh_python3. #186

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

nuclearsandwich
Copy link
Collaborator

I've been using this patch in order to pass --no-guessing-deps through dh_python3.

Since I've not been using this for Python2 releases I haven't added a sibling configuration value for dh-python2-parameters but it would be straightforward to add.

@nuclearsandwich
Copy link
Collaborator Author

I am also interested in helping to maintain stdeb if you're looking for additional maintainers since we're still using it in the Python infrastructure packages for ROS.

@astraw
Copy link
Owner

astraw commented Apr 22, 2022

I sent you an invite to become a maintainer for this stdeb repo. Another maintainer, @dirk-thomas, was also heavily involved in ROS in case you two want to check notes.

I am not really using stdeb much anymore and will leave it to the "real maintainers" (like Dirk and now you) to decide on this.

@nuclearsandwich
Copy link
Collaborator Author

I sent you an invite to become a maintainer for this stdeb repo.

Thank you for continuing to support stdeb by responding so quickly to this request!
I am not planning to rush through a new release but if you'd like to get it all taken care of together, I'd like to have access to push future [releases to PyPI](https://pypi.org/project/stdeb/ as well. My username is nuclearsandwich there as well and I have multi-factor authentication enabled.

Another maintainer, @dirk-thomas, was also heavily involved in ROS in case you two want to check notes.

Indeed he was. Although his work has taken him elsewhere recently. I'll converse with the rest of the active ROS infrastructure maintainers and suggest a colleague from among them who can help me co-maintain and provide review for this PR in particular.

If there are any other stdeb users who would like to review from the community feedback is very welcome as well!

@astraw
Copy link
Owner

astraw commented Apr 25, 2022

@nuclearsandwich PyPI should now also have sent you an invite to be a maintainer of https://pypi.org/project/stdeb/ . Thanks much to you and the ROS team past and present for maintaining this and let me know if I can help in any way.

@Evidlo
Copy link
Contributor

Evidlo commented Jul 23, 2022

Any news on the new maintainership? I'd like to make a PR to be able to specify the signing key, but I'd like to know if it'll get merged.

@nuclearsandwich
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Any news on the new maintainership? I'd like to make a PR to be able to specify the signing key, but I'd like to know if it'll get merged.

I have access to review, merge, and make new releases. My time for stdeb will come in small bursts of activity so if you have a PR staged my advice is to open it so that it's there for the next time I can slot some hours for stdeb.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants