feat: add tests for build post list script #3284
Conversation
✅ Deploy Preview for asyncapi-website ready!Built without sensitive environment variables
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration. |
vishvamsinh28
requested review from
derberg,
akshatnema,
magicmatatjahu,
anshgoyalevil,
Mayaleeeee and
asyncapi-bot-eve
as code owners
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces significant modifications to the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (4)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (3)
🔇 Additional comments (7)scripts/build-post-list.js (7)
The updated function signature with explicit parameters and the added validation for empty directories improve the function's flexibility and robustness.
The existing review comment about preserving the original error stack trace is still valid. Consider using the error cause pattern for better error handling.
The changes to parent and section ID handling, along with the updated recursive call, properly maintain the document hierarchy. Also applies to: 82-82
The existing review comment about avoiding reuse of the
The existing review comment about using
The change to named exports improves the module's interface clarity and maintainability.
Since the main objective of this PR is to add tests, let's verify the test coverage for the main functionality. ✅ Verification successfulLet me gather more information about the test coverage by checking the actual test implementations. Test coverage for buildPostList function is comprehensive The test suite provides thorough coverage of the buildPostList function, including:
The test coverage aligns well with the function's implementation and handles all major error paths and edge cases. 🏁 Scripts executedThe following scripts were executed for the analysis: Script: #!/bin/bash
# Description: Check test coverage for buildPostList function
# Look for test cases in the test file
echo "Searching for buildPostList test cases..."
rg -A 5 "describe.*buildPostList" "tests/"
echo "Checking error handling test cases..."
rg -A 5 "throw.*Error" "tests/"
Length of output: 874 Script: #!/bin/bash
# Get the full content of build-post-list.test.js to analyze test coverage
echo "Content of build-post-list.test.js:"
cat tests/build-post-list.test.js
# Also check the implementation to compare against test cases
echo -e "\nContent of scripts/build-post-list.js:"
cat scripts/build-post-list.js
Length of output: 13924 Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
|
⚡️ Lighthouse report for the changes in this PR:
Lighthouse ran on https://deploy-preview-3284--asyncapi-website.netlify.app/ |
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #3284 +/- ##
===========================================
+ Coverage 49.14% 61.80% +12.65%
===========================================
Files 21 21
Lines 647 652 +5
===========================================
+ Hits 318 403 +85
+ Misses 329 249 -80 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 4
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (9)
scripts/index.js (3)
11-15: LGTM! Consider extractingpostDirectoriesfor improved maintainability.The new
postDirectoriesarray provides a clear and flexible way to define the directories to be processed bybuildPostList. This change enhances the configurability of the script.For improved maintainability, consider extracting this array to a separate configuration file. This would allow easier updates to the directory list without modifying the main script. For example:
const { postDirectories } = require('../config/build-config.js');
16-17: LGTM! Consider usingresolveforbasePathas well.The introduction of
basePathandwriteFilePathvariables improves the flexibility of the script by allowing easy configuration of input and output paths.For consistency, consider using
resolveforbasePathas well:const basePath = resolve(__dirname, '..', 'pages');This ensures that the path is always resolved correctly, regardless of the current working directory.
19-19: LGTM! Consider adding error handling.The updated
buildPostListfunction call correctly uses the new parameters, providing more flexibility in the post list building process.Consider adding error handling to manage potential failures in the
buildPostListfunction:try { await buildPostList(postDirectories, basePath, writeFilePath); } catch (error) { console.error('Error building post list:', error); // Optionally, you might want to throw the error or handle it in a way that's appropriate for your application }This will help in identifying and debugging any issues that may occur during the post list building process.
tests/build-post-list.test.js (5)
37-53: LGTM with suggestion: Consider enhancing assertion specificityThe test case effectively verifies the basic functionality of buildPostList. It checks for the existence of the output file and the presence of expected properties in the output.
To further improve the test, consider adding more specific assertions about the content of the output. For example, you could check for the exact number of entries in each category or verify specific fields of the blog entry beyond just the title.
55-82: LGTM with suggestion: Enhance negative test casesThese test cases effectively cover important scenarios: handling directories with only section files and processing multiple release notes. The assertions verify the presence of expected entries in the output.
To make these tests more robust, consider adding negative assertions. For example, in the "handles multiple release notes correctly" test, you could also verify that no unexpected release notes are present in the output.
84-101: LGTM with suggestions: Enhance error handling test and expand slugifyToC testsThe error handling test and slugifyToC tests are good additions to the test suite. However, there are opportunities for improvement:
For the error handling test, consider asserting on the specific type of error thrown, not just that an error is thrown.
The slugifyToC tests cover various input scenarios well. Consider adding a test case for a regular heading without an ID to ensure the function behaves correctly in this common scenario.
Example:
it('handles regular headings without ids', () => { const input = '## My Regular Heading'; expect(slugifyToC(input)).toBe('my-regular-heading'); });
148-189: LGTM with suggestion: Enhance error message assertionsThese additional error handling tests are valuable additions to the test suite, covering important scenarios such as unreadable directories, unparseable front matter, and the case where no post directories are provided.
To further improve these tests, consider making the error message assertions more specific. Instead of just checking for a partial match with "Error while building post list", you could assert on more detailed error messages that provide information about the specific error condition. This would ensure that the function is not only throwing errors but also providing helpful error messages for debugging.
Example:
expect(error.message).toMatch(/Error while building post list: Unable to read directory/);
1-191: Great job on the comprehensive test suite!This test suite for the buildPostList and slugifyToC functions is well-structured and covers a wide range of scenarios, including both happy paths and error cases. The use of beforeEach and afterEach hooks for setup and teardown is commendable.
To further enhance the test suite, consider adding the following:
- Performance test: Add a test case with a large number of files to ensure the function performs well under load.
- Edge case: Test with very long file names or paths to ensure there are no issues with path length limits.
- Internationalization: If relevant, add tests with non-ASCII characters in file names and content to ensure proper handling of international content.
These additions would make an already strong test suite even more robust.
scripts/build-post-list.js (1)
39-40: Remove commented out codeThere is a commented-out
console.logstatement at line 39. If it's no longer needed, consider removing it to keep the code clean.Apply this diff to remove the commented code:
- // console.log(inspect(result, { depth: null, colors: true }))
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
- scripts/build-post-list.js (6 hunks)
- scripts/index.js (1 hunks)
- tests/build-post-list.test.js (1 hunks)
- tests/index.test.js (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (8)
tests/index.test.js (2)
Line range hint
1-35: LGTM! The changes are consistent throughout the file.The updated import statement for
buildPostListis the only change in this file, and it's correctly reflected in the rest of the code. The test cases and mocks usebuildPostListdirectly, which is consistent with the new named import. The overall structure and functionality of the tests remain intact.
2-2: LGTM! Verify the corresponding export in the source file.The change from default import to named import is a good practice and improves code clarity. This change suggests that
buildPostListis now exported as a named export in thebuild-post-list.jsfile.To ensure consistency, please verify that the export in
scripts/build-post-list.jsmatches this import style. You can run the following script to check:✅ Verification successful
Export Style Verified
The
scripts/build-post-list.jsfile correctly exportsbuildPostListas a named export:module.exports = {slugifyToC, buildPostList}🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the export style of buildPostList in the source file # Test: Search for the export of buildPostList. Expect: Named export rg --type javascript 'exports?.buildPostList|module\.exports.*buildPostList' scripts/build-post-list.jsLength of output: 140
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the export style of buildPostList in the source file without specifying file type # Test: Search for the export of buildPostList. Expect: Named export rg 'exports?.buildPostList|module\.exports.*buildPostList' scripts/build-post-list.jsLength of output: 132
scripts/index.js (2)
4-19: Summary: Good refactoring, ensure consistency across the codebase.The changes to
scripts/index.jssignificantly improve the flexibility and configurability of the post list building process. The introduction ofpostDirectories,basePath, andwriteFilePathvariables, along with the updatedbuildPostListfunction call, allow for easier maintenance and future extensions.To ensure consistency across the codebase:
- Verify that all files importing
buildPostListhave been updated to use the new named import syntax.- Check if there are any other scripts or components that might be affected by these changes and update them accordingly.
- Update any documentation or comments related to the post list building process to reflect these new configurations.
Run the following script to identify potential areas that might need updates:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Identify potential areas affected by the changes # Test 1: Find all files that import from build-post-list.js echo "Files importing from build-post-list.js:" rg --type js "from ['\"].*build-post-list['\"]" # Test 2: Find all files that mention buildPostList echo "Files mentioning buildPostList:" rg --type js "buildPostList" # Test 3: Check for any hardcoded paths related to blog, docs, or about pages echo "Files with hardcoded paths:" rg --type js "pages/(blog|docs|about)"Review the output of this script to ensure all affected areas are properly updated.
4-4: Verify the export change inbuild-post-list.jsand update other imports.The import statement for
buildPostListhas been changed from a default import to a named import. This suggests a corresponding change in thebuild-post-list.jsfile.Please run the following script to verify the export in
build-post-list.jsand check for any other import statements in the codebase that might need updating:Ensure that all occurrences are updated to use the new named import syntax.
✅ Verification successful
Export and Imports Verified Successfully.
The
build-post-list.jsfile correctly exportsbuildPostListas a named export, and all import statements in the codebase, includingscripts/index.js, have been appropriately updated. No further issues were detected.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the export in build-post-list.js and check for other imports # Test 1: Check the export in build-post-list.js echo "Checking export in build-post-list.js:" rg --type js "export.*buildPostList" scripts/build-post-list.js # Test 2: Check for other import statements in the codebase echo "Checking for other import statements:" rg --type js "import.*buildPostList.*from ['\"]./build-post-list['\"]" --glob '!scripts/index.js'Length of output: 2201
tests/build-post-list.test.js (2)
1-35: LGTM: Well-structured test setupThe import statements and describe block setup are well-organized. The use of beforeEach and afterEach hooks to create and clean up a temporary directory structure ensures isolated and repeatable tests. This approach follows testing best practices.
103-146: LGTM: Comprehensive coverage of specification file handlingThese tests effectively verify that the buildPostList function correctly handles various types of specification files that should not be processed. The tests cover files without a title, files with "next-spec" in the filename, and files with "explorer" in the filename. The consistent approach across these tests and the verification of the absence of these entries in the output demonstrate thorough testing of this functionality.
scripts/build-post-list.js (2)
163-163: Ensure imports are updated after exportingbuildPostListNow that
buildPostListis exported, make sure all modules that import it are updated accordingly.Run the following script to find all import statements of
build-post-list:#!/bin/bash # Description: Find all import statements of `build-post-list`. # Expectation: Imports should destructure `buildPostList` from the module. rg --type js "require\(.+build-post-list.+\)" -A 2
29-43: Ensure all calls tobuildPostListare updatedThe
buildPostListfunction now acceptspostDirectories,basePath, andwriteFilePathas parameters. Ensure that all places wherebuildPostListis called have been updated to use the new signature.Run the following script to find all calls to
buildPostListand verify their parameters:✅ Verification successful
All calls to
buildPostListhave been updated to use the new signature with three arguments.
tests/build-post-list.test.jsscripts/index.js🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Find all calls to `buildPostList` in the codebase. # Expectation: Calls should use the new signature with three arguments. rg --type js "buildPostList\(" -A 2Length of output: 714
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Find all direct calls to `buildPostList` in the JavaScript codebase. # Improved search pattern to capture function calls with varying whitespace and argument structures. rg --type js "\bbuildPostList\s*\(" -A 2Length of output: 2505
| if (details.slug.startsWith('/docs')) | ||
| result["docs"].push(details) | ||
| else if(details.slug.startsWith('/blog')) | ||
| else if (details.slug.startsWith('/blog')) | ||
| result["blog"].push(details) | ||
| else if(details.slug.startsWith('/about')) | ||
| else if (details.slug.startsWith('/about')) | ||
| result["about"].push(details) | ||
| else {} | ||
| else { } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Remove unnecessary empty else block in addItem function
The empty else { } block at line 26 serves no purpose and can be removed to clean up the code.
Apply this diff to remove the empty block:
else if (details.slug.startsWith('/about'))
result["about"].push(details)
- else { }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| if (details.slug.startsWith('/docs')) | |
| result["docs"].push(details) | |
| else if(details.slug.startsWith('/blog')) | |
| else if (details.slug.startsWith('/blog')) | |
| result["blog"].push(details) | |
| else if(details.slug.startsWith('/about')) | |
| else if (details.slug.startsWith('/about')) | |
| result["about"].push(details) | |
| else {} | |
| else { } | |
| if (details.slug.startsWith('/docs')) | |
| result["docs"].push(details) | |
| else if (details.slug.startsWith('/blog')) | |
| result["blog"].push(details) | |
| else if (details.slug.startsWith('/about')) | |
| result["about"].push(details) |
| } catch (error) { | ||
| throw new Error(`Error while building post list: ${error.message}`); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Preserve original error stack trace when rethrowing errors
When rethrowing an error in the catch block, consider using throw error to preserve the original stack trace, or use the cause property to retain the error's context.
Apply this diff to preserve the original error:
} catch (error) {
- throw new Error(`Error while building post list: ${error.message}`);
+ throw error;
}Alternatively, to add context while preserving the original error:
} catch (error) {
+ throw new Error('Error while building post list', { cause: error });
}Note: The cause option is available in Node.js v16.9.0 and newer.
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| } catch (error) { | |
| throw new Error(`Error while building post list: ${error.message}`); | |
| } catch (error) { | |
| throw error; | |
| } | |
| ``` | |
| Option 2: Add context while preserving the original error | |
| ```suggestion | |
| } catch (error) { | |
| throw new Error('Error while building post list', { cause: error }); | |
| } |
| const fileName_without_extension = file.slice(0, -4) | ||
| // removes the file extension. For example, release-notes-2.1.0.md -> release-notes-2.1.0 | ||
| const version = fileName_without_extension.slice(fileName_without_extension.lastIndexOf("-")+1) | ||
| const version = fileName_without_extension.slice(fileName_without_extension.lastIndexOf("-") + 1) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Use path module functions to handle file extensions safely
Instead of manually slicing the file name to remove the extension, use path.basename and path.extname for safer and more reliable handling of file names and extensions.
Apply this diff:
- const fileName_without_extension = file.slice(0, -4)
+ const fileNameWithoutExtension = basename(file, extname(file))Don't forget to import the required functions at the top of the file:
const { resolve, basename } = require('path')
+ const { extname } = require('path')Update subsequent code to use fileNameWithoutExtension.
Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
| if (details.slug.includes('/reference/specification/') && !details.title) { | ||
| const fileBaseName = basename(data.slug) // ex. v2.0.0 | v2.1.0-next-spec.1 | ||
| const fileName = fileBaseName.split('-')[0] // v2.0.0 | v2.1.0 | ||
| details.weight = specWeight-- | ||
|
|
||
| if (fileName.startsWith('v')) { | ||
| details.title = capitalize(fileName.slice(1)) | ||
| details.title = capitalize(fileName.slice(1)) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Avoid reusing variable names to prevent confusion
The variable fileName is redefined within this block, which may cause confusion with the outer fileName. Consider renaming the inner fileName variable to avoid shadowing.
Apply this diff to rename the inner fileName to versionName:
const fileBaseName = basename(data.slug) // ex. v2.0.0 | v2.1.0-next-spec.1
- const fileName = fileBaseName.split('-')[0] // v2.0.0 | v2.1.0
+ const versionName = fileBaseName.split('-')[0] // v2.0.0 | v2.1.0
details.weight = specWeight--
- if (fileName.startsWith('v')) {
- details.title = capitalize(fileName.slice(1))
+ if (versionName.startsWith('v')) {
+ details.title = capitalize(versionName.slice(1))
} else {
- details.title = capitalize(fileName)
+ details.title = capitalize(versionName)
}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| if (details.slug.includes('/reference/specification/') && !details.title) { | |
| const fileBaseName = basename(data.slug) // ex. v2.0.0 | v2.1.0-next-spec.1 | |
| const fileName = fileBaseName.split('-')[0] // v2.0.0 | v2.1.0 | |
| details.weight = specWeight-- | |
| if (fileName.startsWith('v')) { | |
| details.title = capitalize(fileName.slice(1)) | |
| details.title = capitalize(fileName.slice(1)) | |
| if (details.slug.includes('/reference/specification/') && !details.title) { | |
| const fileBaseName = basename(data.slug) // ex. v2.0.0 | v2.1.0-next-spec.1 | |
| const versionName = fileBaseName.split('-')[0] // v2.0.0 | v2.1.0 | |
| details.weight = specWeight-- | |
| if (versionName.startsWith('v')) { | |
| details.title = capitalize(versionName.slice(1)) | |
| } else { | |
| details.title = capitalize(versionName) | |
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
tests/build-post-list.test.js (3)
37-53: Consider adding more specific assertionsWhile this test case covers the basic functionality of
buildPostList, it could be enhanced by adding more specific assertions about the content of the output. For example, you could check for the exact number of entries in each category (docs, blog, about) and verify the structure of individual entries.Here's an example of how you could add more specific assertions:
expect(output.docs).toHaveLength(1); expect(output.blog).toHaveLength(1); expect(output.about).toHaveLength(1); const docEntry = output.docs[0]; expect(docEntry).toHaveProperty('title', 'Docs Home'); expect(docEntry).toHaveProperty('slug', '/docs'); expect(docEntry).toHaveProperty('excerpt');
84-101: Enhance error handling test and add a case for slugifyToCThe error handling test is good, but it could be more specific:
For the error handling test, consider asserting the specific type of error thrown:
await expect(buildPostList([invalidDir], tempDir, writeFilePath)).rejects.toThrow(Error);Add a test case for slugifyToC with a regular heading without an ID:
it('handles regular headings without ids', () => { const input = '## My Regular Heading'; expect(slugifyToC(input)).toBe('my-regular-heading'); });These additions will improve the test coverage and make the error handling more robust.
148-187: Enhance error handling testsWhile these additional error handling tests cover important scenarios, they could be improved for more precise error checking:
Instead of catching the error and checking its message, use
expect().rejects.toThrow()for asynchronous functions:it('throws an error if the directory cannot be read', async () => { const invalidDir = [join(tempDir, 'non-existent-dir'), '/invalid']; await expect(buildPostList([invalidDir], tempDir, writeFilePath)) .rejects.toThrow(/Error while building post list/); });Apply the same pattern to the other two error tests.
Consider adding more specific error message checks if the
buildPostListfunction throws different error messages for different scenarios.These changes will make the tests more robust and easier to maintain.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
- tests/build-post-list.test.js (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (4)
tests/build-post-list.test.js (4)
1-35: LGTM: Well-structured test setupThe import statements and describe block setup are well-organized. The use of beforeEach and afterEach hooks ensures a clean test environment for each test case, which is a good practice for maintaining test isolation.
55-82: LGTM: Good coverage of edge casesThese test cases effectively cover important scenarios:
- Handling directories with only section files.
- Processing multiple release notes correctly.
The tests are well-structured and include specific assertions to verify the correct behavior of the
buildPostListfunction in these scenarios.
103-146: LGTM: Comprehensive tests for specification file filteringThese test cases effectively cover the filtering of specification files:
- Files without a title
- Files with "next-spec" in the filename
- Files with "explorer" in the filename
The tests are well-structured and include appropriate assertions to verify that these files are not processed by the
buildPostListfunction. This ensures that only the intended files are included in the final output.
1-189: Overall: Well-structured and comprehensive test suiteThis test file provides a thorough and well-organized suite of tests for the
buildPostListandslugifyToCfunctions. Key strengths include:
- Comprehensive coverage of happy paths, edge cases, and error scenarios.
- Consistent structure throughout the file.
- Good use of beforeEach and afterEach hooks for test isolation.
- Effective testing of file filtering logic.
While there are some minor suggestions for improvements (as noted in previous comments), the overall quality of the test suite is high. It should provide robust validation of the functions' behavior and help catch potential regressions in future development.
|
Tests are passing on Ubuntu but failing on Windows. I will keep it as a draft until I find a solution for it. |
vishvamsinh28
force-pushed
the
buildPostTest
branch
2 times, most recently
from
98f835b
to
ecf927e
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
scripts/build-post-list.js (2)
29-43: Improved flexibility and error handling inbuildPostListThe changes to the
buildPostListfunction are well-implemented:
- The function now accepts parameters, enhancing its configurability and reusability.
- Error handling for empty
postDirectorieshas been added, which is a good practice.- The use of a
writeFilePathparameter allows for more flexible output options.These changes align well with the PR objectives of adding tests, as they make the function more testable.
However, the error handling in the catch block could be improved to preserve the original error stack trace.
Consider updating the error handling to preserve the original stack trace:
} catch (error) { - throw new Error(`Error while building post list: ${error.message}`); + throw new Error('Error while building post list', { cause: error }); }This change will provide more context for debugging while preserving the original error information.
125-128: Improve variable naming consistency in release notes handlingWhile the logic for extracting version information from release notes file names has been updated, the variable naming could be improved for consistency and clarity.
Consider updating the variable names to follow the camelCase convention used elsewhere in the code:
- const fileName_without_extension = file.slice(0, -4) + const fileNameWithoutExtension = file.slice(0, -4)This change will improve code consistency and readability.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
- scripts/build-post-list.js (7 hunks)
- tests/build-post-list.test.js (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- tests/build-post-list.test.js
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (6)
scripts/build-post-list.js (6)
2-2: Improved cross-platform compatibilityThe addition of
joinandsepfrom thepathmodule enhances the code's ability to handle file paths consistently across different operating systems. This is a positive change that aligns with best practices for cross-platform Node.js applications.
47-47: Improved consistency inwalkDirectoriesfunctionThe addition of
basePathto thewalkDirectoriesfunction signature and its recursive call ensures consistent handling of the base path throughout the directory traversal process. This change enhances the function's flexibility and aligns well with the modifications made tobuildPostList.Also applies to: 83-83
55-57: Enhanced cross-platform compatibility in file path handlingThe updates to file path handling using
joinandsep, as well as the platform-independent index file check, significantly improve the code's cross-platform compatibility. These changes ensure consistent behavior across different operating systems and align with Node.js best practices for file system operations.Also applies to: 98-98
57-57: Improved slug generation for cross-platform consistencyThe update to slug generation now uses the
basePathparameter and normalizes separators to forward slashes. This change ensures consistent slug generation across different platforms, further enhancing the code's cross-platform compatibility.
162-163: Improved module API with updated exportsThe module exports have been updated to include both
slugifyToCandbuildPostListfunctions. This change enhances the module's API by making both functions available for external use, which aligns well with the PR objectives of adding tests for thebuild-post-list.jsscript. This modification will facilitate easier testing and potential reuse of these functions in other parts of the project.
Line range hint
1-163: Overall assessment of changes tobuild-post-list.jsThe modifications to this file are well-implemented and align closely with the PR objectives of adding tests for the
build-post-list.jsscript. Key improvements include:
- Enhanced cross-platform compatibility through better file path handling.
- Improved function flexibility with parameterized inputs.
- Better error handling, particularly in the
buildPostListfunction.- Updated module exports for easier testing and potential reuse.
These changes contribute positively to the codebase by improving testability, maintainability, and cross-platform consistency. The script is now better equipped to handle various input scenarios, which should facilitate more comprehensive testing.
There are a few minor suggestions for improvement, such as preserving the original error stack trace and maintaining consistent variable naming conventions. Addressing these points will further enhance the overall quality of the code.
vishvamsinh28
force-pushed
the
buildPostTest
branch
from
da6c058
to
fe9c3da
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
tests/build-post-list.test.js (1)
62-64: Remove unnecessaryconsole.logstatements in testsThe
console.logstatements at lines 62, 64, and 72 are unnecessary and can clutter the test output. Consider removing them to keep the test output clean.Apply this diff to remove the
console.logstatements:- console.log("output before ", output); - console.log("output after ", output); - console.log("blog entry ", blogEntry);Also applies to: 72-72
| it('throws an error if the directory cannot be read', async () => { | ||
| const invalidDir = [join(tempDir, 'non-existent-dir'), '/invalid']; | ||
|
|
||
| let error; | ||
| try { | ||
| await buildPostList([invalidDir], tempDir, writeFilePath); | ||
| } catch (err) { | ||
| error = err; | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| expect(error).toBeDefined(); | ||
| expect(error.message).toMatch(/Error while building post list/); | ||
| }); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Duplicate test cases for invalid directory error handling
The test case at lines 175-187 duplicates the earlier test at lines 108-111, both checking the handling of invalid directories. Consider consolidating these tests to avoid redundancy.
Apply this diff to remove the duplicate test:
- it('throws an error if the directory cannot be read', async () => {
- const invalidDir = [join(tempDir, 'non-existent-dir'), '/invalid'];
-
- let error;
- try {
- await buildPostList([invalidDir], tempDir, writeFilePath);
- } catch (err) {
- error = err;
- }
-
- expect(error).toBeDefined();
- expect(error.message).toMatch(/Error while building post list/);
- });📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| it('throws an error if the directory cannot be read', async () => { | |
| const invalidDir = [join(tempDir, 'non-existent-dir'), '/invalid']; | |
| let error; | |
| try { | |
| await buildPostList([invalidDir], tempDir, writeFilePath); | |
| } catch (err) { | |
| error = err; | |
| } | |
| expect(error).toBeDefined(); | |
| expect(error.message).toMatch(/Error while building post list/); | |
| }); |
tests/build-post-list.test.js
Outdated
| const normalizeItem = (item) => { | ||
| if (item.id) { | ||
| item.id = normalizePath(item.id); | ||
| } | ||
| return item; | ||
| }; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Avoid mutating function arguments in normalizeItem
Modifying the item parameter directly in the normalizeItem function can lead to unintended side effects. Instead, return a new object with the updated id property.
Apply this diff to refactor the normalizeItem function:
const normalizeItem = (item) => {
- if (item.id) {
- item.id = normalizePath(item.id);
- }
- return item;
+ return {
+ ...item,
+ id: item.id ? normalizePath(item.id) : item.id,
+ };
};📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| const normalizeItem = (item) => { | |
| if (item.id) { | |
| item.id = normalizePath(item.id); | |
| } | |
| return item; | |
| }; | |
| const normalizeItem = (item) => { | |
| return { | |
| ...item, | |
| id: item.id ? normalizePath(item.id) : item.id, | |
| }; | |
| }; |
vishvamsinh28
force-pushed
the
buildPostTest
branch
from
0b9b50e
to
7ae14bd
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (4)
tests/index.test.js (1)
Line range hint
16-33: Consider updating the test forbuildPostList.The test suite currently only checks if
buildPostListis called, but doesn't verify its parameters. SincebuildPostListnow accepts three parameters (postDirectories,basePath, andwriteFilePath), consider updating the test to ensure it's called with the correct arguments.Here's a suggested update to the test:
test('should call all functions in the correct order', async () => { await start(); expect(buildPostList).toHaveBeenCalledWith( expect.any(Array), // postDirectories expect.any(String), // basePath expect.any(String) // writeFilePath ); // ... rest of the test remains the same });This change will provide more robust verification of the
buildPostListfunction usage.scripts/index.js (2)
11-17: LGTM: New variables improve configurability.The introduction of
postDirectories,basePath, andwriteFilePathvariables enhances the flexibility of the post list building process. This is a good improvement.Consider adding a brief comment explaining the structure of the
postDirectoriesarray for improved readability:// Each item in postDirectories is a pair of [directoryPath, urlPath] const postDirectories = [ ['pages/blog', '/blog'], ['pages/docs', '/docs'], ['pages/about', '/about'] ];
Line range hint
1-70: Overall assessment: Changes improve flexibility and maintainability.The modifications to
scripts/index.jsalign well with the PR objectives. They support the new functionality being tested in thebuild-post-list.jsscript by updating the import statement and function call. These changes enhance the flexibility and configurability of the post list building process.Consider documenting the new parameter structure for
buildPostListin a README or inline documentation to help future developers understand the configuration options quickly.scripts/build-post-list.js (1)
71-72: LGTM: Improved handling of nested sectionsThe changes in how
parentandsectionIdare set, along with the updated recursive call towalkDirectories, improve the handling of nested sections. This makes the code more robust when dealing with different directory structures.For added clarity, consider adding a comment explaining the logic behind using
slugElements.length - 2andslugElements.length - 1forparentandsectionIdrespectively.Also applies to: 82-82
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
- scripts/build-post-list.js (7 hunks)
- scripts/index.js (1 hunks)
- tests/build-post-list.test.js (1 hunks)
- tests/index.test.js (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- tests/build-post-list.test.js
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (10)
tests/index.test.js (2)
Line range hint
1-33: Overall, the changes look good with room for improvement.The import statement has been correctly updated to reflect the changes in the
buildPostListfunction. However, the test suite could be enhanced to verify the new function signature. Consider implementing the suggested changes to improve test coverage and ensure consistency with the updatedbuildPostListfunction.
2-2: LGTM! Import statement updated correctly.The change from default import to named import is correct and consistent with the changes in the
buildPostListfunction.To ensure consistency, let's verify if the
startfunction has been updated to use the newbuildPostListparameters:✅ Verification successful
Verified! The
startfunction correctly usesbuildPostListwith the updated parameters.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check if the start function uses the new buildPostList parameters # Test: Search for buildPostList usage in the start function rg -A 5 'function start' scripts/index.js | rg 'buildPostList'Length of output: 62
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that buildPostList is called with three parameters in scripts/index.js # Search for buildPostList function calls with exactly three arguments ast-grep --pattern 'buildPostList($_, $_, $_)' scripts/index.jsLength of output: 150
scripts/index.js (2)
4-4: LGTM: Import statement updated correctly.The change to use destructuring for importing
buildPostListis consistent with modern JavaScript practices and improves code readability.
19-19: LGTM: Function call updated correctly.The
buildPostListfunction call has been correctly updated to include the new parameters, which is consistent with the changes in the function's signature.To ensure that the
buildPostListfunction in thebuild-post-list.jsfile correctly handles these new parameters, please run the following verification script:This script will help verify that the function signature has been updated correctly and that there are no remaining calls to
buildPostListwithout parameters.scripts/build-post-list.js (6)
2-2: LGTM: Cleaned up importsGood job on cleaning up the imports by only importing the
basenamefunction from thepathmodule. This is a best practice that helps keep the code clean and potentially improves performance.
20-26: Improved readability, but consider removing empty else blockThe changes to the
addItemfunction improve readability with better whitespace. However, the emptyelse { }block at line 26 is still present and serves no purpose. Consider removing it as suggested in the previous review.
29-43: Improved function signature and error handling, but consider preserving error stack traceThe changes to the
buildPostListfunction are good improvements:
- The updated function signature allows for more flexibility.
- The new error handling for empty
postDirectoriesis a good addition.- Writing to a specified
writeFilePathenhances the function's configurability.However, as mentioned in a previous review, consider preserving the original error stack trace when rethrowing errors. You can do this by either using
throw erroror using thecauseproperty to retain the error's context.
47-47: LGTM: Updated walkDirectories function signatureThe addition of the
basePathparameter to thewalkDirectoriesfunction signature is a good change. It aligns with the updates in thebuildPostListfunction and allows for more flexible handling of directory paths.
99-105: Consider renaming variables and improving consistencyThe changes in this section make minor adjustments to the logic for handling specification references. However, as mentioned in a previous review, the variable
fileNameis still being reused, which could lead to confusion. Consider renaming the innerfileNameto something likeversionNamefor clarity.Also, for consistency, consider using template literals for string concatenation in line 105:
details.title = `${capitalize(fileName.slice(1))}`Also applies to: 110-110
125-128: Improved exports, but consider refining file name handlingThe export of
slugifyToCandbuildPostListfunctions is a good practice for modularity. However, there are a couple of points to consider:
As mentioned in a previous review, instead of manually slicing the file name to remove the extension, consider using
path.basenameandpath.extnamefor safer and more reliable handling of file names and extensions.The logic for extracting the version from the file name could be simplified and made more robust. Consider using a regular expression to extract the version number directly:
const versionMatch = file.match(/release-notes-(.+)\.md$/); if (versionMatch) { const version = versionMatch[1]; releaseNotes.push(version); }This approach would be more resilient to changes in file naming conventions.
Also applies to: 162-163
anshgoyalevil
added
the
gsoc
This script adds tests for build-post-list.js script
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
buildPostListandslugifyToCfunctions.Bug Fixes
Documentation