Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: wrong overall coverage report dependencies #110

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 4, 2023

Conversation

cuinixam
Copy link
Contributor

@cuinixam cuinixam commented Dec 4, 2023

No description provided.

@cuinixam cuinixam requested a review from xxthunder December 4, 2023 04:41
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Dec 4, 2023

Test Results

41 tests   41 ✔️  3m 15s ⏱️
  1 suites    0 💤
  1 files      0

Results for commit b83ba06.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

@cuinixam
Copy link
Contributor Author

cuinixam commented Dec 4, 2023

We are using ninja 1.11.1 where ninja-build/ninja#1964 should be included. I do not understand why this problem still occurs.

cmake/common.cmake Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@@ -318,6 +319,8 @@ macro(_spl_add_test_suite PROD_SRC TEST_SOURCES)
)

# Create coverage report
set(GLOBAL_COMPONENTS_COVERAGE_JSON_LIST "${GLOBAL_COMPONENTS_COVERAGE_JSON_LIST};${CMAKE_CURRENT_BINARY_DIR}/coverage.json" CACHE INTERNAL "List of all coverage.json files")

set(COV_OUT_JSON coverage.json)
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We should use this variable name everywhere instead of "coverage.json".

cmake/common.cmake Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
cmake/common.cmake Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@cuinixam cuinixam merged commit 399f166 into develop Dec 4, 2023
4 checks passed
@cuinixam cuinixam deleted the fix_coverage_deps branch December 4, 2023 11:59
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants