Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use GITHUB_OUTPUT envvar instead of set-output command as the latter is deprecated #3878

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 8, 2024
Merged

Conversation

arunsathiya
Copy link
Contributor

save-state and set-output commands used in GitHub Actions are deprecated and GitHub recommends using environment files.

This PR updates the usage of set-output to $GITHUB_OUTPUT

Instructions for envvar usage from GitHub docs:

https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/workflow-commands-for-github-actions#setting-an-output-parameter

Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 31, 2023

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (375d9d7) 91.00% compared to head (a9fca7c) 91.01%.
Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #3878   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   91.00%   91.01%           
=======================================
  Files         901      901           
  Lines       57565    57566    +1     
=======================================
+ Hits        52389    52392    +3     
+ Misses       5176     5174    -2     
Flag Coverage Δ
gcov 91.01% <ø> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
luacov 93.72% <ø> (-0.01%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

see 3 files with indirect coverage changes

Copy link
Member

@actionless actionless left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

thanks for looking into this!

@mergify mergify bot merged commit 75758b0 into awesomeWM:master Jan 8, 2024
11 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants