Use correct waiting methods for shutdown futures. #92
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
brandondahler
force-pushed
the
bugfix/IncorrectShutdownWaitMethods
branch
from
d376652 to
ba598aa
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description of changes:
Updates usages of
orTimeout(long, TimeUnit)toget(long, TimeUnit).orTimeout(long, TimeUnit)does not block the thread waiting for the shutdown to occur, instead it only schedules the future to throw aTimeoutExceptionif it doesn't complete before the timeout occurs.get(long, TimeUnit)is the appropriate way to block the current thread until either the future completes normally (successfully or exceptionally) or the timeout occurs.By submitting this pull request, I confirm that you can use, modify, copy, and redistribute this contribution, under the terms of your choice.