temp(proposal): Include cosmos txs in block proposal #1469
Conversation
WalkthroughThe recent modifications across several files in the Cosmos codebase enhance the miner's functionality and transaction processing. Key updates include the removal of outdated Changes
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review Status
Actionable comments generated: 1
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files selected for processing (4)
- cosmos/runtime/miner/abci.go (1 hunks)
- cosmos/runtime/miner/miner.go (4 hunks)
- cosmos/runtime/runtime.go (3 hunks)
- cosmos/runtime/txpool/mempool.go (5 hunks)
Additional comments: 11
cosmos/runtime/miner/abci.go (2)
- 41-44: The commented-out block related to Ethereum's
gethminer block building process has been removed. This aligns with the PR's objective to focus on Cosmos transactions and temporarily exclude Ethereum block proposals.- 32-58: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [48-60]
The logic for processing validator messages and combining them with payload envelopes has been adjusted. Ensure that the removal of Ethereum-specific logic and the focus on Cosmos transactions do not introduce any regressions or unintended side effects in the block proposal process.
Verification successful
Given the context and the output from the shell script, it's clear that the script provided was a placeholder and did not perform any actual verification of the code changes or their impact on the system. Therefore, to proceed with the verification process effectively, we need to employ a different strategy that involves analyzing the codebase for references to the modified logic, specifically focusing on how validator messages are processed and combined with payload envelopes. This will help us understand if the changes align with the project's objectives and do not introduce any regressions or unintended side effects.
To achieve this, we should look for references to the processing of validator messages and the combination of payload envelopes within the codebase. This can include searching for method calls or logic that has been modified or introduced in the provided code snippet. Additionally, checking for tests related to this logic could provide insights into its correctness and integration.
The search results from the codebase confirm the presence of the
valTxsandallTxsvariables within thecosmos/runtime/miner/abci.gofile, specifically in the context of processing validator messages and combining them with payload envelopes. This directly relates to the code snippet under review, indicating that the logic for handling validator transactions and their combination into a single transaction set for the proposal is indeed implemented as described.However, the search did not yield any results for tests specifically targeting this logic, based on the search criteria used. This absence of test references in the output could suggest that either the tests do not explicitly mention
allTxsorvalTxsin a way that was captured by the search or that there is a lack of direct unit tests for this specific logic change.Given the information available, the changes to the logic for processing validator messages and combining them with payload envelopes, as described in the review comment, are verified to be present in the codebase. However, the potential lack of direct testing for these changes cannot be conclusively determined from the search results provided. It would be advisable for the project team to ensure that adequate testing around this logic is in place to prevent regressions or unintended side effects.
Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Verify the integration and functionality of the new logic for processing validator messages. # This script is a placeholder for manual verification steps that should be taken. echo "Manual verification required: Ensure the new logic for processing validator messages integrates correctly and functions as expected."Length of output: 274
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for references to the processing of validator messages and combination with payload envelopes. # This includes looking for method calls or logic related to 'allTxs' or 'valTxs'. # Search for references to 'allTxs' and 'valTxs' in the codebase. echo "Searching for references to 'allTxs' and 'valTxs'..." rg "allTxs|valTxs" --context 5 # Additionally, search for tests related to this logic. echo -e "\nSearching for tests related to validator message processing and payload envelope combination..." rg "test" --glob "*_test.go" | grep -E "allTxs|valTxs"Length of output: 2234
cosmos/runtime/txpool/mempool.go (3)
- 68-68: The addition of the
cmdsPoolfield to theMempoolstruct introduces a new mempool for managing Cosmos transactions. This change supports the PR's objective to enhance transaction management within the Cosmos ecosystem.- 88-88: Initializing the
cmdsPoolwithmempool.DefaultPriorityMempool()in theNewfunction is a good practice, as it ensures that the new mempool is set up with default priority handling. This should improve transaction management efficiency.- 122-122: The update to the
Insertmethod to utilize thecmdsPoolfor inserting transactions aligns with the PR's focus on enhancing transaction management. Ensure that this change does not negatively impact transaction insertion performance or correctness.cosmos/runtime/miner/miner.go (3)
- 51-54: The addition of
txVerifierandcmdsMempoolfields to theMinerstruct is a significant enhancement, enabling transaction verification and mempool management directly within the miner. This change supports the PR's objectives of refining transaction selection and verification mechanisms.- 63-74: Modifications to the
Newfunction to includecmdsMempoolandtxVerifieras parameters are correctly implemented. These changes are necessary for initializing theMinerstruct with the new fields, aligning with the PR's focus on enhancing transaction management and verification.- 176-199: The updated
processValidatorMsgsfunction now utilizes thecmdsMempoolfor selecting transactions and thetxVerifierfor verifying them before processing. This approach is in line with the PR's objectives. However, ensure that the additional verification step does not introduce significant performance overhead.cosmos/runtime/runtime.go (3)
- 46-46: The addition of the
github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/baseappimport is necessary for utilizingbaseapp.ProposalTxVerifierand other baseapp functionalities. This change supports the integration of enhanced transaction verification within the Cosmos runtime.- 74-74: Including
baseapp.ProposalTxVerifierin theCosmosAppinterface is a strategic enhancement that aligns with the PR's focus on improving transaction verification. This inclusion facilitates the use of a standardized verification mechanism across the Cosmos runtime.- 148-149: The modification of the
Polarisstruct'sBuildmethod to includep.WrappedTxPoolandappas parameters in the call tominer.Newis correctly implemented. This change is essential for integrating the enhanced transaction pool and app functionalities within the Polaris runtime setup.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review Status
Actionable comments generated: 0
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files selected for processing (2)
- cosmos/runtime/miner/miner.go (5 hunks)
- cosmos/runtime/txpool/mempool.go (5 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
- cosmos/runtime/miner/miner.go
- cosmos/runtime/txpool/mempool.go
NOTE: For now, excludes Eth block proposal entirely
Summary by CodeRabbit