You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Potential Performance Issue The generate_report method uses a for loop to process chunks of data, which might be inefficient for large datasets. Consider using a more memory-efficient approach or implementing parallel processing.
Code Duplication The transform_psm method contains multiple similar operations for adding columns to the DataFrame. Consider refactoring to reduce duplication and improve maintainability.
Error Handling The fetch_modifications_from_mztab_line function raises exceptions without proper error handling or logging. Consider implementing more robust error handling and providing informative error messages.
Improve memory efficiency when writing large DataFrames to Parquet files
Consider using a more memory-efficient approach when writing large DataFrames to Parquet files by using the pyarrow.parquet.ParquetWriter with chunked writing.
-for p in self.generate_report(chunksize=chunksize,protein_str=protein_str):- if not pqwriter:- pqwriter = pq.ParquetWriter(output_path, p.schema)- pqwriter.write_table(p)+with pq.ParquetWriter(output_path, PSM_SCHEMA) as pqwriter:+ for p in self.generate_report(chunksize=chunksize, protein_str=protein_str):+ pqwriter.write_table(p)
Apply this suggestion
Suggestion importance[1-10]: 8
Why: The suggestion provides a significant improvement in memory efficiency by using a context manager for ParquetWriter, which is a good practice for handling large data. This change is beneficial for resource management, warranting a higher score.
8
Vectorize the generation of 'pg_positions' for improved performance
Use a more efficient method to generate the pg_positions column by vectorizing the operation instead of using apply.
-df.loc[:, 'pg_positions'] = df[['start','end']].apply(- lambda row: self.generate_positions(row["start"], row["end"]),- axis=1-)+df['pg_positions'] = df['start'].str.split(',').combine(df['end'].str.split(','), lambda x, y: [f'{s}:{e}' for s, e in zip(x, y)])
Apply this suggestion
Suggestion importance[1-10]: 7
Why: The suggestion correctly identifies a potential performance improvement by vectorizing the operation, which can lead to faster execution for large DataFrames. However, the improvement is not critical, hence a moderate score.
7
Vectorize the generation of 'additional_scores' for improved performance
Use a more efficient method to generate the additional_scores column by applying the function to the entire DataFrame at once instead of row by row.
-df.loc[:, "additional_scores"] = df[list(self._score_names.values())].apply(self._genarate_additional_scores,axis=1)+df["additional_scores"] = df[list(self._score_names.values())].apply(lambda x: [{"name": name, "value": x[score]} for name, score in self._score_names.items()], axis=1)
Apply this suggestion
Suggestion importance[1-10]: 7
Why: The suggestion offers a valid performance enhancement by vectorizing the operation, which can be beneficial for large datasets. The change is not essential but can improve efficiency, justifying a moderate score.
7
Optimize the generation of 'peptidoform' for better performance
Consider using a more efficient method to generate the peptidoform column by vectorizing the operation instead of using apply.
Why: The suggestion proposes a vectorized approach, but the improved code does not fully vectorize the operation as it still uses apply. The impact on performance is limited, resulting in a lower score.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
PR Type
enhancement, documentation, tests
Description
MzTab
andPsmInMemory
.Changes walkthrough 📝
4 files
common.py
Define PSM mapping and additional attributes
quantmsio/temp_core/common.py
PSM_MAP
andPSM_USECOLS
for mapping PSM data.ADDITIONS
list for additional PSM attributes.format.py
Define schema for PSM fields using PyArrow
quantmsio/temp_core/format.py
PEPTIDE_FIELDS
andPSM_UNIQUE_FIELDS
using PyArrow.PSM_FIELDS
.mzTab.py
Implement MzTab class for mzTab file processing
quantmsio/temp_core/mzTab.py
MzTab
class for handling mzTab files.psm.py
Create PsmInMemory class for PSM processing
quantmsio/temp_core/psm.py
PsmInMemory
class extendingMzTab
.1 files
test_new_psm.py
Add test case for PsmInMemory class
tests/test_new_psm.py
PsmInMemory
class.5 files
README.adoc
Update README with new PSM field descriptions
docs/README.adoc
feature.avsc
Update field names in feature schema
docs/feature.avsc
peptide.avsc
Update field names in peptide schema
docs/peptide.avsc
protein.avsc
Update field names in protein schema
docs/protein.avsc
psm.avsc
Update field names in PSM schema
docs/psm.avsc