Updated newly generated xml files

bitcoinsearch · Sep 20, 2024 · f9cd58e · f9cd58e
1 parent 453332b
commit f9cd58e
Show file tree

Hide file tree

Showing 21 changed files with 482 additions and 110 deletions.
diff --git a/static/bitcoin-dev/April_2024/combined_Adding-New-BIP-Editors.xml b/static/bitcoin-dev/April_2024/combined_Adding-New-BIP-Editors.xml
@@ -2,7 +2,13 @@
 <feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
   <id>2</id>
   <title>Combined summary - Adding New BIP Editors</title>
-  <updated>2024-09-19T02:21:53.861219+00:00</updated>
+  <updated>2024-09-20T02:22:13.466269+00:00</updated>
+  <author>
+    <name>Mark Erhardt 2024-09-19 18:48:00+00:00</name>
+  </author>
+  <author>
+    <name>Antoine Riard 2024-09-19 07:47:00+00:00</name>
+  </author>
   <author>
     <name>Mark Erhardt 2024-09-18 18:25:00+00:00</name>
   </author>
@@ -294,6 +300,8 @@
   <author>
     <name>Ava Chow 2024-02-27 18:53:00+00:00</name>
   </author>
+  <link href="bitcoin-dev/Sept_2024/m82e3c7fa86ff8755b24bf69a9b43f432e0631363_Adding-New-BIP-Editors.xml" rel="alternate"/>
+  <link href="bitcoin-dev/Sept_2024/mebd0b21fc5360bb9da0dd2d8c6e523f5e38f9dbe_Adding-New-BIP-Editors.xml" rel="alternate"/>
   <link href="bitcoin-dev/Sept_2024/m7aa4ef5825506ce2577480eff433d1cdd8c15c22_Adding-New-BIP-Editors.xml" rel="alternate"/>
   <link href="bitcoin-dev/May_2024/m07fe8e6870cedf27b36d3f343bce76f167f5344b_Adding-New-BIP-Editors.xml" rel="alternate"/>
   <link href="bitcoin-dev/April_2024/mb5f42888ad48243a362dbc931aeb4b8e948d3966_Adding-New-BIP-Editors.xml" rel="alternate"/>
@@ -395,11 +403,15 @@
   <entry>
     <id>2</id>
     <title>Combined summary - Adding New BIP Editors</title>
-    <updated>2024-09-19T02:21:53.862035+00:00</updated>
-    <link href="https://gnusha.org/pi/bitcoindev/CAMHHROw9mZJRnTbUo76PdqwJU==YJMvd9Qrst+nmyypaedYZgg@mail.gmail.com/T/#m7aa4ef5825506ce2577480eff433d1cdd8c15c22" rel="alternate"/>
-    <summary>The conversation around updating the Bitcoin Improvement Proposal (BIP) process has been robust, with several key points being raised to streamline and improve its efficiency. A significant concern highlighted is Luke's acknowledgment of his limitations in actively managing the BIPs repository, which underscores the urgent need for more hands on deck. The community is leaning towards expanding the team of BIP editors, a move that's seen as vital for addressing the current backlog and ensuring the timely review and integration of proposals. The role of a BIP editor is multifaceted, encompassing tasks such as assigning BIP numbers and merging pull requests, among others outlined in [BIP 2](https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0002.mediawikiuser-content-BIP_Editor_Responsibilities__Workflow). This role demands individuals who are not only deeply involved in Bitcoin development but also possess the ability to assess proposals impartially.
+    <updated>2024-09-20T02:22:13.466996+00:00</updated>
+    <link href="https://gnusha.org/pi/bitcoindev/CAMHHROw9mZJRnTbUo76PdqwJU==YJMvd9Qrst+nmyypaedYZgg@mail.gmail.com/T/#m82e3c7fa86ff8755b24bf69a9b43f432e0631363" rel="alternate"/>
+    <summary>The recent discourse within the Bitcoin Development Mailing List has shed light on the pressing issue of managing and advancing Bitcoin Improvement Proposals (BIPs), which are crucial for the evolution of Bitcoin's protocol. The acknowledgment of a bottleneck in the BIP process, primarily due to limited oversight capacity, has catalyzed discussions on enhancing the procedural framework for BIP evaluations and integrations.
+
+A pivotal suggestion that emerged from these talks is the proposal to augment the team of BIP editors. This role, characterized by responsibilities such as assigning BIP numbers, merging new proposals, and implementing corrections to existing ones, demands individuals with a robust understanding of Bitcoin's technical landscape and a commitment to its development ethos. The necessity for additional editors stems from the current inability to efficiently manage the inflow of proposals, thereby hindering the timely refinement of Bitcoin's protocol.
+
+In addressing this need, two individuals, Kanzure and RubenSomsen, have been identified as potential candidates for the editorship. Their history of active involvement and valuable contributions positions them as fitting choices to take on the editorial roles, promising to alleviate the existing constraints and foster a more streamlined process.
 
-Kanzure and RubenSomsen have emerged as strong candidates for this position, thanks to their active contributions to the Bitcoin ecosystem. Their potential inclusion as BIP editors is anticipated to significantly alleviate the procedural bottlenecks currently faced. Moreover, the discussion has emphasized the importance of consensus among new editors regarding the numbering scheme of BIPs, highlighting the need for a cohesive approach to maintaining the repository's integrity and consistency. This dialogue reflects a concerted effort within the community to refine the governance of Bitcoin's developmental process, aiming to foster an environment where improvements can be made more efficiently and inclusively.</summary>
-    <published>2024-09-18T18:25:00+00:00</published>
+Moreover, the conversation emphasizes the importance of consensus among the editors, especially regarding the BIP numbering scheme. This aspect underlines the collective effort required to maintain the coherence and integrity of the BIP repository. The deliberation reflects a broader understanding of the challenges at hand and exhibits a proactive stance towards resolving them, ensuring that the BIP process remains a vital and efficient mechanism for Bitcoin's continuous improvement.</summary>
+    <published>2024-09-19T18:48:00+00:00</published>
   </entry>
 </feed>
diff --git a/static/bitcoin-dev/Feb_2024/combined_Adding-New-BIP-Editors.xml b/static/bitcoin-dev/Feb_2024/combined_Adding-New-BIP-Editors.xml
@@ -2,7 +2,13 @@
 <feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
   <id>2</id>
   <title>Combined summary - Adding New BIP Editors</title>
-  <updated>2024-09-19T02:21:53.861219+00:00</updated>
+  <updated>2024-09-20T02:22:13.466269+00:00</updated>
+  <author>
+    <name>Mark Erhardt 2024-09-19 18:48:00+00:00</name>
+  </author>
+  <author>
+    <name>Antoine Riard 2024-09-19 07:47:00+00:00</name>
+  </author>
   <author>
     <name>Mark Erhardt 2024-09-18 18:25:00+00:00</name>
   </author>
@@ -294,6 +300,8 @@
   <author>
     <name>Ava Chow 2024-02-27 18:53:00+00:00</name>
   </author>
+  <link href="bitcoin-dev/Sept_2024/m82e3c7fa86ff8755b24bf69a9b43f432e0631363_Adding-New-BIP-Editors.xml" rel="alternate"/>
+  <link href="bitcoin-dev/Sept_2024/mebd0b21fc5360bb9da0dd2d8c6e523f5e38f9dbe_Adding-New-BIP-Editors.xml" rel="alternate"/>
   <link href="bitcoin-dev/Sept_2024/m7aa4ef5825506ce2577480eff433d1cdd8c15c22_Adding-New-BIP-Editors.xml" rel="alternate"/>
   <link href="bitcoin-dev/May_2024/m07fe8e6870cedf27b36d3f343bce76f167f5344b_Adding-New-BIP-Editors.xml" rel="alternate"/>
   <link href="bitcoin-dev/April_2024/mb5f42888ad48243a362dbc931aeb4b8e948d3966_Adding-New-BIP-Editors.xml" rel="alternate"/>
@@ -395,11 +403,15 @@
   <entry>
     <id>2</id>
     <title>Combined summary - Adding New BIP Editors</title>
-    <updated>2024-09-19T02:21:53.862035+00:00</updated>
-    <link href="https://gnusha.org/pi/bitcoindev/CAMHHROw9mZJRnTbUo76PdqwJU==YJMvd9Qrst+nmyypaedYZgg@mail.gmail.com/T/#m7aa4ef5825506ce2577480eff433d1cdd8c15c22" rel="alternate"/>
-    <summary>The conversation around updating the Bitcoin Improvement Proposal (BIP) process has been robust, with several key points being raised to streamline and improve its efficiency. A significant concern highlighted is Luke's acknowledgment of his limitations in actively managing the BIPs repository, which underscores the urgent need for more hands on deck. The community is leaning towards expanding the team of BIP editors, a move that's seen as vital for addressing the current backlog and ensuring the timely review and integration of proposals. The role of a BIP editor is multifaceted, encompassing tasks such as assigning BIP numbers and merging pull requests, among others outlined in [BIP 2](https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0002.mediawikiuser-content-BIP_Editor_Responsibilities__Workflow). This role demands individuals who are not only deeply involved in Bitcoin development but also possess the ability to assess proposals impartially.
+    <updated>2024-09-20T02:22:13.466996+00:00</updated>
+    <link href="https://gnusha.org/pi/bitcoindev/CAMHHROw9mZJRnTbUo76PdqwJU==YJMvd9Qrst+nmyypaedYZgg@mail.gmail.com/T/#m82e3c7fa86ff8755b24bf69a9b43f432e0631363" rel="alternate"/>
+    <summary>The recent discourse within the Bitcoin Development Mailing List has shed light on the pressing issue of managing and advancing Bitcoin Improvement Proposals (BIPs), which are crucial for the evolution of Bitcoin's protocol. The acknowledgment of a bottleneck in the BIP process, primarily due to limited oversight capacity, has catalyzed discussions on enhancing the procedural framework for BIP evaluations and integrations.
+
+A pivotal suggestion that emerged from these talks is the proposal to augment the team of BIP editors. This role, characterized by responsibilities such as assigning BIP numbers, merging new proposals, and implementing corrections to existing ones, demands individuals with a robust understanding of Bitcoin's technical landscape and a commitment to its development ethos. The necessity for additional editors stems from the current inability to efficiently manage the inflow of proposals, thereby hindering the timely refinement of Bitcoin's protocol.
+
+In addressing this need, two individuals, Kanzure and RubenSomsen, have been identified as potential candidates for the editorship. Their history of active involvement and valuable contributions positions them as fitting choices to take on the editorial roles, promising to alleviate the existing constraints and foster a more streamlined process.
 
-Kanzure and RubenSomsen have emerged as strong candidates for this position, thanks to their active contributions to the Bitcoin ecosystem. Their potential inclusion as BIP editors is anticipated to significantly alleviate the procedural bottlenecks currently faced. Moreover, the discussion has emphasized the importance of consensus among new editors regarding the numbering scheme of BIPs, highlighting the need for a cohesive approach to maintaining the repository's integrity and consistency. This dialogue reflects a concerted effort within the community to refine the governance of Bitcoin's developmental process, aiming to foster an environment where improvements can be made more efficiently and inclusively.</summary>
-    <published>2024-09-18T18:25:00+00:00</published>
+Moreover, the conversation emphasizes the importance of consensus among the editors, especially regarding the BIP numbering scheme. This aspect underlines the collective effort required to maintain the coherence and integrity of the BIP repository. The deliberation reflects a broader understanding of the challenges at hand and exhibits a proactive stance towards resolving them, ensuring that the BIP process remains a vital and efficient mechanism for Bitcoin's continuous improvement.</summary>
+    <published>2024-09-19T18:48:00+00:00</published>
   </entry>
 </feed>
diff --git a/static/bitcoin-dev/March_2024/combined_Adding-New-BIP-Editors.xml b/static/bitcoin-dev/March_2024/combined_Adding-New-BIP-Editors.xml
@@ -2,7 +2,13 @@
 <feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
   <id>2</id>
   <title>Combined summary - Adding New BIP Editors</title>
-  <updated>2024-09-19T02:21:53.861219+00:00</updated>
+  <updated>2024-09-20T02:22:13.466269+00:00</updated>
+  <author>
+    <name>Mark Erhardt 2024-09-19 18:48:00+00:00</name>
+  </author>
+  <author>
+    <name>Antoine Riard 2024-09-19 07:47:00+00:00</name>
+  </author>
   <author>
     <name>Mark Erhardt 2024-09-18 18:25:00+00:00</name>
   </author>
@@ -294,6 +300,8 @@
   <author>
     <name>Ava Chow 2024-02-27 18:53:00+00:00</name>
   </author>
+  <link href="bitcoin-dev/Sept_2024/m82e3c7fa86ff8755b24bf69a9b43f432e0631363_Adding-New-BIP-Editors.xml" rel="alternate"/>
+  <link href="bitcoin-dev/Sept_2024/mebd0b21fc5360bb9da0dd2d8c6e523f5e38f9dbe_Adding-New-BIP-Editors.xml" rel="alternate"/>
   <link href="bitcoin-dev/Sept_2024/m7aa4ef5825506ce2577480eff433d1cdd8c15c22_Adding-New-BIP-Editors.xml" rel="alternate"/>
   <link href="bitcoin-dev/May_2024/m07fe8e6870cedf27b36d3f343bce76f167f5344b_Adding-New-BIP-Editors.xml" rel="alternate"/>
   <link href="bitcoin-dev/April_2024/mb5f42888ad48243a362dbc931aeb4b8e948d3966_Adding-New-BIP-Editors.xml" rel="alternate"/>
@@ -395,11 +403,15 @@
   <entry>
     <id>2</id>
     <title>Combined summary - Adding New BIP Editors</title>
-    <updated>2024-09-19T02:21:53.862035+00:00</updated>
-    <link href="https://gnusha.org/pi/bitcoindev/CAMHHROw9mZJRnTbUo76PdqwJU==YJMvd9Qrst+nmyypaedYZgg@mail.gmail.com/T/#m7aa4ef5825506ce2577480eff433d1cdd8c15c22" rel="alternate"/>
-    <summary>The conversation around updating the Bitcoin Improvement Proposal (BIP) process has been robust, with several key points being raised to streamline and improve its efficiency. A significant concern highlighted is Luke's acknowledgment of his limitations in actively managing the BIPs repository, which underscores the urgent need for more hands on deck. The community is leaning towards expanding the team of BIP editors, a move that's seen as vital for addressing the current backlog and ensuring the timely review and integration of proposals. The role of a BIP editor is multifaceted, encompassing tasks such as assigning BIP numbers and merging pull requests, among others outlined in [BIP 2](https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0002.mediawikiuser-content-BIP_Editor_Responsibilities__Workflow). This role demands individuals who are not only deeply involved in Bitcoin development but also possess the ability to assess proposals impartially.
+    <updated>2024-09-20T02:22:13.466996+00:00</updated>
+    <link href="https://gnusha.org/pi/bitcoindev/CAMHHROw9mZJRnTbUo76PdqwJU==YJMvd9Qrst+nmyypaedYZgg@mail.gmail.com/T/#m82e3c7fa86ff8755b24bf69a9b43f432e0631363" rel="alternate"/>
+    <summary>The recent discourse within the Bitcoin Development Mailing List has shed light on the pressing issue of managing and advancing Bitcoin Improvement Proposals (BIPs), which are crucial for the evolution of Bitcoin's protocol. The acknowledgment of a bottleneck in the BIP process, primarily due to limited oversight capacity, has catalyzed discussions on enhancing the procedural framework for BIP evaluations and integrations.
+
+A pivotal suggestion that emerged from these talks is the proposal to augment the team of BIP editors. This role, characterized by responsibilities such as assigning BIP numbers, merging new proposals, and implementing corrections to existing ones, demands individuals with a robust understanding of Bitcoin's technical landscape and a commitment to its development ethos. The necessity for additional editors stems from the current inability to efficiently manage the inflow of proposals, thereby hindering the timely refinement of Bitcoin's protocol.
+
+In addressing this need, two individuals, Kanzure and RubenSomsen, have been identified as potential candidates for the editorship. Their history of active involvement and valuable contributions positions them as fitting choices to take on the editorial roles, promising to alleviate the existing constraints and foster a more streamlined process.
 
-Kanzure and RubenSomsen have emerged as strong candidates for this position, thanks to their active contributions to the Bitcoin ecosystem. Their potential inclusion as BIP editors is anticipated to significantly alleviate the procedural bottlenecks currently faced. Moreover, the discussion has emphasized the importance of consensus among new editors regarding the numbering scheme of BIPs, highlighting the need for a cohesive approach to maintaining the repository's integrity and consistency. This dialogue reflects a concerted effort within the community to refine the governance of Bitcoin's developmental process, aiming to foster an environment where improvements can be made more efficiently and inclusively.</summary>
-    <published>2024-09-18T18:25:00+00:00</published>
+Moreover, the conversation emphasizes the importance of consensus among the editors, especially regarding the BIP numbering scheme. This aspect underlines the collective effort required to maintain the coherence and integrity of the BIP repository. The deliberation reflects a broader understanding of the challenges at hand and exhibits a proactive stance towards resolving them, ensuring that the BIP process remains a vital and efficient mechanism for Bitcoin's continuous improvement.</summary>
+    <published>2024-09-19T18:48:00+00:00</published>
   </entry>
 </feed>