-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 251
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Maintenance start time style and clock UI and theme changes #1869
Maintenance start time style and clock UI and theme changes #1869
Conversation
@ajhollid please review the PR, let me know if there are any changes. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Auto Pull Request Review from LlamaPReview
1. Overview
1.1 PR Summary
- Business value and requirements alignment: The PR aims to improve the user interface and experience by introducing style changes to the clock UI and input field labels in the create maintenance page. These changes align with the project's goal of maintaining a consistent and visually appealing user interface.
- Key components modified: The primary components affected by this PR are the clock UI and input field labels in the create maintenance page.
- Impact assessment: The changes are expected to have a low impact on the system, as they are primarily UI-focused. However, thorough testing is required to ensure that these changes do not introduce any regressions or unexpected behavior.
- System dependencies and integration impacts: As the changes are UI-focused, there are no critical system dependencies or integration impacts to consider at this level. However, during the detailed code review, it's essential to ensure that these UI changes do not affect other components or introduce any visual inconsistencies.
1.2 Architecture Changes
- System design modifications: No significant system design modifications are introduced in this PR, as the changes focus on the UI layer.
- Component interactions: The changes affect the interaction between the user and the create maintenance page, specifically the clock UI and input field labels. These changes should not introduce any new component interactions or affect existing ones.
- Integration points: As the changes are UI-focused, there are no new integration points to consider. However, during the detailed code review, it's essential to ensure that these UI changes do not introduce any unexpected behavior or break existing functionality.
2. Detailed Technical Analysis
2.1 Code Logic Deep-Dive
Core Logic Changes
- src/Utils/Theme/globalTheme.js - Clock UI and input field label styles
- Submitted PR Code:
// Clock UI styles
MuiClockPicker: {
styleOverrides: {
root: ({ theme }) => ({
backgroundColor: theme.palette.primary.main,
"& .MuiTypography-root": {
color: theme.palette.primary.lowContrast,
},
"& .MuiClock-clock": {
backgroundColor: theme.palette.primary.dark,
borderColor: theme.palette.primary.lowContrast,
},
}),
},
},
// ... (other clock UI styles)
// Input field label styles
MuiInputLabel: {
styleOverrides: {
root: ({ theme }) => ({
"&.Mui-focused": {
color: theme.palette.accent.main,
},
}),
},
},
-
Analysis:
- The current logic introduces new styles for the clock UI and input field labels in the create maintenance page. The changes include background colors, text colors, and other visual properties for different elements within the clock UI and input field labels.
- Edge cases and error handling: The changes seem to cover typical use cases, but it's essential to ensure that the chosen colors maintain sufficient contrast for accessibility purposes, especially for users with visual impairments. Additionally, it's crucial to ensure that these changes adapt well to different screen sizes and devices.
- Cross-component impact: These changes might affect other components that use the same theme, so it's crucial to ensure that the new styles do not introduce any unwanted visual inconsistencies. During the detailed code review, it's essential to verify that these changes do not affect other components or introduce any regressions.
- Business logic considerations: The new styles should align with the application's overall theme and branding guidelines to maintain a consistent user experience. Additionally, it's crucial to ensure that these changes do not introduce any performance issues or regressions.
-
LlamaPReview Suggested Improvements:
- Clock UI styles:
MuiClockPicker: {
styleOverrides: {
root: ({ theme }) => ({
backgroundColor: theme.palette.primary.main,
"& .MuiTypography-root": {
color: theme.palette.primary.contrastText, // Use contrastText for better accessibility
},
"& .MuiClock-clock": {
backgroundColor: theme.palette.primary.dark,
borderColor: theme.palette.primary.lowContrast,
},
}),
},
},
// ... (other clock UI styles with suggested improvements)
- **Input field label styles**:
- No improvements suggested, as the current logic covers the required use cases and maintains sufficient contrast for accessibility.
-
Improvement rationale:
- Using
contrastText
instead oflowContrast
for the clock's text color ensures better accessibility by providing sufficient contrast against the background color. This change helps users with visual impairments better distinguish the text on the clock. Additionally, usingcontrastText
for other clock UI elements ensures better visibility and accessibility.
- Using
-
src/Utils/Theme/globalTheme.js - Input field label styles (focused state)
- Submitted PR Code:
MuiInputLabel: {
styleOverrides: {
root: ({ theme }) => ({
"&.Mui-focused": {
color: theme.palette.accent.main,
},
}),
},
},
- Analysis: (Same as the previous analysis for input field label styles)
- LlamaPReview Suggested Improvements: No improvements suggested, as the current logic covers the required use cases and maintains sufficient contrast for accessibility.
2.2 Implementation Quality
- Code organization and structure: The changes are well-organized and follow a clear structure, with each style override defined separately for better maintainability.
- Design patterns usage: The PR follows the design pattern of using Material-UI's theme customization to apply styles consistently across the application.
- Error handling approach: As the changes are UI-focused, there is no error handling to consider in this context.
- Resource management: As the changes are UI-focused, there is no resource management to consider in this context.
3. Critical Findings
Expand for critical findings
3.1 Potential Issues
-
🔴 Critical Issues
- Inconsistent color usage: The PR uses
lowContrast
for the clock's text color, which might not provide sufficient contrast against the background color, making it difficult for users with visual impairments to distinguish the text. This issue should be addressed to ensure better accessibility.- Impact: Reduced accessibility for users with visual impairments.
- Recommendation: Update the clock's text color to use
contrastText
instead oflowContrast
to ensure better accessibility.
- Inconsistent color usage: The PR uses
-
🟡 Warnings
- Potential performance impact: While the changes are UI-focused and do not introduce any new functionality, it's essential to ensure that these changes do not introduce any performance regressions. Thorough testing is required to validate the performance of the application after these changes.
- Potential risks: Reduced performance for users with slower devices or network connections.
- Suggested improvements: Conduct thorough performance testing to ensure that the application maintains its performance after these changes.
- Potential performance impact: While the changes are UI-focused and do not introduce any new functionality, it's essential to ensure that these changes do not introduce any performance regressions. Thorough testing is required to validate the performance of the application after these changes.
3.2 Code Quality Concerns
- Maintainability aspects: The changes are well-organized and follow a clear structure, making them easy to maintain and update in the future.
- Readability issues: The changes are easy to read and understand, with clear comments and structure.
- Performance bottlenecks: As the changes are UI-focused, there are no performance bottlenecks to consider in this context.
4. Security Assessment
Expand for security assessment
- Authentication/Authorization impacts: As the changes are UI-focused, there are no authentication or authorization impacts to consider.
- Data handling concerns: As the changes are UI-focused, there are no data handling concerns to consider.
- Input validation: As the changes are UI-focused, there is no input validation to consider in this context.
- Security best practices: The changes follow security best practices by using theme customization to apply styles consistently across the application.
- Potential security risks: As the changes are UI-focused, there are no potential security risks to consider.
- Mitigation strategies: As the changes are UI-focused, there are no mitigation strategies to consider in this context.
- Security testing requirements: Thorough security testing is required to ensure that these UI changes do not introduce any security vulnerabilities.
5. Testing Strategy
Expand for testing strategy
5.1 Test Coverage
- Unit test analysis: As the changes are UI-focused, there are no unit tests to consider in this context.
- Integration test requirements: Thorough integration testing is required to ensure that these UI changes do not introduce any regressions or unexpected behavior.
- Edge cases coverage: Edge cases should be considered during integration testing to ensure that these UI changes adapt well to different screen sizes, devices, and user interactions.
5.2 Test Recommendations
Suggested Test Cases
// Example test case for clock UI styles
it('should display the clock UI with the correct styles', () => {
const { getByTestId } = render(<ClockUI />);
const clock = getByTestId('clock');
expect(clock).toHaveStyle({
backgroundColor: theme.palette.primary.main,
});
expect(getByTestId('clock-text')).toHaveStyle({
color: theme.palette.primary.contrastText,
});
});
- Coverage improvements: Thorough integration testing is required to ensure that these UI changes do not introduce any regressions or unexpected behavior.
- Performance testing needs: Conduct thorough performance testing to ensure that the application maintains its performance after these changes.
6. Documentation & Maintenance
Expand for documentation and maintenance
- Documentation updates needed: Update the documentation to reflect the changes in the clock UI and input field label styles.
- Long-term maintenance considerations: Ensure that the new styles are well-documented and easy to maintain in the future. Additionally, consider any potential future changes that might affect these styles, such as theme updates or new components.
7. Deployment & Operations
Expand for deployment and operations
- Deployment impact and strategy: The changes are UI-focused and should have a low impact on the deployment process. However, thorough testing is required to ensure that these changes do not introduce any regressions or unexpected behavior.
- Key operational considerations: As the changes are UI-focused, there are no critical operational considerations to consider. However, it's essential to monitor the application's performance and user feedback after these changes to ensure that they meet the expected outcome.
8. Summary & Recommendations
8.1 Key Action Items
- Update clock's text color for better accessibility: Update the clock's text color to use
contrastText
instead oflowContrast
to ensure better accessibility for users with visual impairments. - Conduct thorough performance testing: Conduct thorough performance testing to ensure that the application maintains its performance after these changes.
- Update documentation: Update the documentation to reflect the changes in the clock UI and input field label styles.
8.2 Future Considerations
- Theme updates: Consider any potential future theme updates or changes that might affect these styles.
- New components: Consider any potential new components that might require similar or different styling approaches.
💡 Help Shape LlamaPReview
How's this review format working for you? Vote in our Github Discussion Polls to help us improve your review experience!
WalkthroughThis update modifies the global theme configuration for the maintenance page’s clock feature. It applies several style overrides to Material-UI components without altering any exported entities. The changes adjust background colours, typography, and element styling for components such as MuiClock, MuiClockPicker, MuiClockPointer, MuiClockNumber, MuiTimePickerToolbar, MuiPickersArrowSwitcher, and MuiDialogActions. Changes
Suggested reviewers
✨ Finishing Touches
🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
src/Utils/Theme/globalTheme.js (1)
397-469
: Good job implementing comprehensive style overrides for the clock components!The added style overrides for the clock components look well-structured and comprehensive. You've handled all aspects of the clock UI including the picker background, pointer, numbers, toolbar, navigation arrows, and dialog actions. These changes will ensure visual consistency with the rest of the application's theme.
I do have one suggestion though - the comments like "code starts from here" and "code ends here" aren't necessary and could be removed for cleaner code. The component-specific comments are helpful and should be kept.
- // This code is added for clock in maintenance page - // code starts from here. + // Style overrides for clock components in maintenance page MuiClockPicker { // ... existing code ... }, - // code ends here.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
src/Utils/Theme/globalTheme.js
(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
src/Utils/Theme/globalTheme.js (1)
471-480
: Nice touch with the focused input label styling!The accent color on focused input labels provides a subtle but effective visual cue to users, improving the overall user experience when interacting with forms.
Added you as a reviewer here @mohicody |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is still an issue, @ajhollid, since the number isn’t visible on the screen, highlighting it won’t really make sense. That's why the dot won't appear directly on the actual number you see on the clock. Let me know if I'm overlooking something. Thanks! |
The circle appears in light mode: it should also appear in dark: |
@ajhollid and @gorkem-bwl , what do you think now? Screen.Recording.2025-03-07.at.1.04.51.AM.mov |
In MUI docs, they used another color set which is more confusing to me lol. I think your color selection is better. https://mui.com/x/react-date-pickers/time-picker/#available-components |
Reason for using a accent to tell user what they are choosing and its aligned with the picker in the clock. I did see the MUI doc and didn't make sense as how can the top tool bar and bottom have the same bg. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
src/Utils/Theme/globalTheme.js (3)
398-399
: Remove these temporary clarification commentsThese lines seem to include comments that were meant to be temporary for reviewer clarity. Let's keep the code clean by removing the "// This code is added for clock in maintenance page" and "// code starts from here." comments.
- // This code is added for clock in maintenance page - // code starts from here. + // Clock and time picker styling for maintenance page
451-471
: Consider handling the important declaration more elegantlyThe use of
!important
on line 461 might be avoidable. While it works, it's generally better to avoid using!important
when possible.- "& .Mui-selected": { - color: `${theme.palette.accent.main} !important`, // Use your accent color - }, + "& .Mui-selected": { + color: theme.palette.accent.main, + }, + "& .MuiPickersToolbar-title .Mui-selected": { + color: theme.palette.accent.main, + },
493-493
: Remove this temporary commentThis comment was added for reviewer clarity and should be removed.
- // code ends here.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
src/Utils/Theme/globalTheme.js
(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (7)
src/Utils/Theme/globalTheme.js (7)
400-411
: LGTM - Good background color choices for the clockThe background colors look appropriate and should create good contrast. You've used theme colors correctly which maintains consistency with the rest of the app.
427-437
: Good choice using accent color for the pointerThe use of accent.main for the pointer and grey[500] for the thumb creates a nice visual hierarchy. The clock pointer will stand out well.
439-449
: This addresses the visibility issue mentioned in PR commentsNice work! Using accent.contrastText and accent.main for the selected state will fix the visibility issue that was mentioned in the PR comments about selected numbers not being visible in dark mode.
473-481
: LGTM - Arrow switcher styling is consistentThe styling for the direction arrows is consistent with the rest of the interface.
483-491
: LGTM - Dialog actions styling is appropriateThe styling for the dialog actions (cancel/ok buttons) looks good and consistent with the application's theme.
495-504
: Nice touch with the focused input label stylingAdding accent color to the focused input labels creates a nice visual cue for the user. This is a good UX improvement.
412-425
:❓ Verification inconclusive
Verify the contrast ratio for clock elements
The implementation looks good overall, but we should ensure there's sufficient contrast between clock elements, especially in dark mode where visibility issues were mentioned in PR discussions.
🌐 Web query:
What is the recommended contrast ratio for UI elements according to WCAG accessibility standards?
💡 Result:
Yes, WCAG accessibility standards specify different contrast ratio requirements for UI elements compared to text. For user interface components (like buttons, form controls, and interactive elements), the minimum contrast ratio is 3:1 against adjacent colors to meet Level AA compliance under WCAG 2.1[1][4][6][8].
Key Details:
Level AA (Minimum Standard):
- UI elements (buttons, input borders, icons, sliders, etc.): 3:1 contrast ratio[1][4][6].
- Graphical objects (charts, infographics): 3:1 for essential parts[4][6].
- States (hover, focus, selected): 3:1 contrast[1][8].
Exceptions:
- Disabled UI components or elements where appearance is controlled by the browser (e.g., default form styles)[4].
- Logos or brand names have no minimum requirement[8][9].
Comparison to Text Requirements:
Element Type WCAG Level AA WCAG Level AAA Regular text 4.5:1 7:1 Large text 3:1 4.5:1 UI components 3:1 3:1 Tools for Testing:
Use tools like the WebAIM Contrast Checker[6] or Accessible Web’s Checker[10] to validate ratios. For example, a button’s border and background colors must meet the 3:1 threshold to ensure visibility for users with low vision or color deficiencies[4][7].
Non-compliant UI elements risk making interfaces unusable for individuals with moderate visual impairments, particularly in low-light environments or on glare-prone screens[5][7].
Citations:
- 1: https://accessibleweb.com/question-answer/are-there-different-contrast-ratio-requirements-for-text-and-for-ui-elements/
- 2: https://www.oregon.gov/ode/accessibility/checklist/pages/contrast.aspx
- 3: https://accessiblyapp.com/web-accessibility/color-contrast/
- 4: https://www.accessibility-developer-guide.com/knowledge/colours-and-contrast/user-interface-components/
- 5: https://www.maine.edu/content-management/accessibility/color-ratio/
- 6: https://webaim.org/resources/contrastchecker/
- 7: https://www.boia.org/blog/designing-for-color-contrast-guidelines-for-accessibility
- 8: https://webaim.org/articles/contrast/
- 9: https://www.w3.org/TR/UNDERSTANDING-WCAG20/visual-audio-contrast-contrast.html
- 10: https://accessibleweb.com/color-contrast-checker/
Contrast Ratio Verification for Clock Elements
The changes in
src/Utils/Theme/globalTheme.js
(lines 412-425) look solid; however, as discussed in previous PRs, please verify that the clock elements meet accessibility standards in dark mode. According to WCAG 2.1, UI components should have a minimum contrast ratio of 3:1 against adjacent colours. In particular, please ensure that the colour values fortheme.palette.primary.lowContrast
andtheme.palette.secondary.lowContrast
are tested (using tools like WebAIM Contrast Checker) to confirm they provide adequate contrast in both light and dark modes.Keep up the great work—just double-check those ratios so our UI is as accessible as mom's spaghetti is satisfying!
@gorkem-bwl @Owaiseimdad the black text on grey background is hard to read for me: The 2 there should be a more contrasting color, what do you guys think? |
Okay, white should work as the clock has the same color for numbers. Will make it white @ajhollid . |
@swoopertr let me know what color would suite better. |
I am not good with designs, you should better ask ai. |
Sure, let's try that way. |
@ajhollid @gorkem-bwl @swoopertr new UI. Screen.Recording.2025-03-09.at.6.18.29.AM.mov |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
src/Utils/Theme/globalTheme.js (2)
398-399
: Remember to remove these comments after reviewThese explanatory comments were meant for reviewer clarity as mentioned in past feedback. Don't forget to clean these up in the final version.
493-493
: Remove this end marker commentThis is another comment meant for reviewer clarity that should be removed in the final version.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
src/Utils/Theme/constants.js
(1 hunks)src/Utils/Theme/globalTheme.js
(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (9)
src/Utils/Theme/constants.js (1)
273-276
: Nice addition of the color6 gradient variable!This new color gradient with light and dark values will be useful for ensuring consistent theming across different modes. I see it's already being referenced in the clock components.
src/Utils/Theme/globalTheme.js (8)
400-411
: Clock styling looks good - nice background contrastThe background color choices for the clock face create good visual separation. The styling is well organized with the theme system.
412-425
: ClockPicker styling follows theme patterns correctlyThe styling properly leverages theme variables for consistency. Good use of the background.default for the clock face.
427-437
: Effective pointer styling with accent colorsThe clock pointer styling uses accent colors appropriately to draw attention to the selected time. Good choice using the accent.main color for the pointer line.
439-449
: Clock number styling enhances readabilityThe contrast between selected and unselected numbers is clear. The use of accent colors for selected numbers creates visual harmony with the pointer.
451-471
: TimePickerToolbar uses the new color6 gradient effectivelyGood use of the newly added color6 gradient for general text. The selected time styling with accent.main creates appropriate emphasis.
473-481
: Arrow switcher styling matches design systemThe styling for the navigation arrows maintains consistency with the rest of the interface. Good choice using primary.contrastText.
483-491
: Dialog actions styling provides clear user optionsThe dialog actions maintain visual consistency with the primary theme colors, making the buttons clearly visible.
496-504
: Input label focus color matches accent themeNice touch setting the focused label color to match the accent color theme. This provides visual feedback to users during interaction.
This is way better. Thanks. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why is there a gradient color used in a non-gradient context? This seems like a recipe for trouble later.
Have added a new property instead of gradient, didn’t know what actually gradients are useful for. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
src/Utils/Theme/globalTheme.js (2)
412-425
: Consider consolidating clock styling properties.I'm seeing some overlap between the MuiClock and MuiClockPicker components. The nested selectors for
.MuiClock-root
and.MuiClock-clock
appear in both style definitions which could lead to specificity issues.MuiClockPicker: { styleOverrides: { root: ({ theme }) => ({ backgroundColor: theme.palette.secondary.main, // Outer container background - "& .MuiClock-root": { - color: theme.palette.primary.lowContrast, - }, - "& .MuiClock-clock": { - backgroundColor: theme.palette.background.default, // Clock face background - borderColor: theme.palette.secondary.lowContrast, - }, + // Only keep unique styling for ClockPicker component }), }, },
459-462
: Avoid using !important when possible.// Selected time (hour/minute) color "& .Mui-selected": { - color: `${theme.palette.accent.main} !important`, + color: theme.palette.accent.main, },The
!important
flag should be avoided when possible as it makes styles harder to override and maintain. Consider using more specific selectors instead.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
src/Utils/Theme/constants.js
(1 hunks)src/Utils/Theme/globalTheme.js
(1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- src/Utils/Theme/constants.js
🔇 Additional comments (7)
src/Utils/Theme/globalTheme.js (7)
398-399
: Remember to remove these comments after review.These comments indicating the start of the clock styling code should be removed after the review process as mentioned in your previous comment.
400-411
: MuiClock styling looks good!The background and clock face styling matches the theme requirements. Nice job setting up the primary and secondary colors for proper contrast.
427-437
: The pointer styling looks great.Your choice of accent color for the clock pointer makes it stand out appropriately. The grey thumb provides good contrast.
438-449
: Good contrast for selected numbers.Using accent colors for the selected clock numbers ensures visibility against the background. Based on previous comments, this addresses the visibility concerns raised in the PR discussion.
493-493
: Remove this comment after review.As mentioned in your previous comments, the "code ends here" marker should be removed once the review is complete.
496-504
: Nice touch with the focused label styling.The accent color on focused input labels provides good visual feedback to users. This improves the UX by clearly indicating which field has focus.
456-458
:✅ Verification successful
Verify timePicker text color property exists.
You're referencing
theme.palette.text.timePicker
, but I don't see where this property is defined in the provided code. Make sure this property exists in your palette configuration.
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Find where timePicker text color is defined rg -A 3 -B 3 "timePicker" --type jsLength of output: 800
Palette Configuration Verified – No Action Needed
ThetimePicker
property is defined in the palette configuration (seesrc/Utils/Theme/constants.js
where it’s declared under thetext
key with both light and dark values). There's nothing further to address here.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We should not define colors for individual components, that defeats the purpose of having a theme. Please use either theme.primary.contrastText
or theme.primary.lowContrast
if you need a low contrast color.
src/Utils/Theme/constants.js
Outdated
timePicker: { | ||
light: paletteColors.gray300, | ||
dark: paletteColors.gray600, | ||
}, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This won't work with MUI components. They must be defined in a very specific format in order to work with MUI. You can reference them directly as you have, but we can't use this with MUIs "variant" system.
Let's just drop this enitirely, I don't see a need to define new colors for this component. The same colors should be used as all other components.
The picker should use theme.primary.contrastText
or theme.primary.lowContrast
if you need a lower contrast color.
If we define a new color scheme for each component we defeat the purpose of the theme.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
have use contrastTextTertiary now, matches some what to the expectation. You can let me know if it works or not.
Screen.Recording.2025-03-10.at.5.41.26.AM.mov
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
src/Utils/Theme/globalTheme.js (3)
398-399
: Remove temporary commentsThese code comments look like temporary markers for the reviewer, which should be removed before merging.
- // This code is added for clock in maintenance page - // code starts from here. + // Clock styling for maintenance page
461-461
: Avoid using !importantMom's spaghetti... I mean, using !important can lead to specificity issues and make future styling changes more difficult. Consider restructuring your selectors to achieve the same result without !important.
- color: `${theme.palette.accent.main} !important`, + color: theme.palette.accent.main,
493-493
: Remove temporary commentThis is another temporary marker that should be removed.
- // code ends here.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
src/Utils/Theme/globalTheme.js
(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (8)
src/Utils/Theme/globalTheme.js (8)
400-411
: LGTM, clock component styling looks goodThe MuiClock component styling properly sets background colors for the clock face using theme values, maintaining consistency with the app's overall design system.
412-425
: Clock picker styling looks solidThe background color and nesting structure follow best practices for Material-UI component styling. Good job maintaining consistent theming.
426-437
: The clock pointer styling looks cleanThe pointer and thumb colors use appropriate theme values to ensure visual consistency.
438-449
: Clock number styling provides good contrastThe styling for the clock numbers creates appropriate visual contrast between selected and non-selected states, addressing the visibility concerns mentioned in the PR comments.
450-471
: Time picker toolbar styling is comprehensiveThe styling for typography elements, selected states, and AM/PM buttons provides a cohesive appearance. Good job addressing the AM/PM button styling specifically.
472-481
: Arrow switcher styling looks goodThe styling for the directional buttons is consistent with the rest of the UI.
482-492
: Dialog actions styling maintains theme consistencyThe styling for dialog action buttons maintains visual consistency with the application's theme.
495-504
: Input label styling looks goodThe focused state styling for input labels uses the accent color appropriately, creating visual consistency with other focused elements.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good, thanks for revising!
Describe your changes
All the changes are with respect to the row of create maintainence "Start time" row.
Issue number
#1848
Please ensure all items are checked off before requesting a review. "Checked off" means you need to add an "x" character between brackets so they turn into checkmarks.
Screen.Recording.2025-03-04.at.11.23.37.PM.mov