Import documentation from the GEOS 2.0 SDK CD. #48
+265,865
−0
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Closed
|
See my latest comment on the issue I opened, the stuff I have seems to be from 1997 and 2000. I'd guess the PDF files are the same, but it is possible the text files differ. Mine also includes html files. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Bulk import of the entire techdocs directory from the 1994 GEOS 2.0 SDK CD.
This all looks quite dated and is missing some later books --- I don't see a mention of the Kernel book, for example. Also the Postscript and PDF documentation is identical, so we probably don't need both, but it's worth having as a historical artefact.
The Postscript contains a comment from Adobe Framemaker at the top, so the source of truth were probably Framemaker files. I have no idea whether they still exist.